economist.com/britain/2026...
from The Economist
economist.com/britain/2026...
from The Economist
So it can't be good that platforms now require writers to delve into and engage with comments if they want their work to be seen.
There is surely only so much "this is why you're wrong and an idiot" the brain can take
So it can't be good that platforms now require writers to delve into and engage with comments if they want their work to be seen.
There is surely only so much "this is why you're wrong and an idiot" the brain can take
The you-have-a-go-at-scoring then I-have-a-go-at-scoring pattern makes for a particularly compelling contest when teams are evenly matched, creating games that are inevitably close and turn on dramatic high-leverage moments
The you-have-a-go-at-scoring then I-have-a-go-at-scoring pattern makes for a particularly compelling contest when teams are evenly matched, creating games that are inevitably close and turn on dramatic high-leverage moments
You don't get to do that without clout. That's someone who likes drinking, tattoos, vibes, and is probably quite useful if anyone tries to rob your bar
You don't get to do that without clout. That's someone who likes drinking, tattoos, vibes, and is probably quite useful if anyone tries to rob your bar
Maybe useful to bear in mind for something
Maybe useful to bear in mind for something
(Bonus points if you can replace it with a rebel European tournament featuring the only teams likely to win it anyway. Call it The Peace Cup or something)
(Bonus points if you can replace it with a rebel European tournament featuring the only teams likely to win it anyway. Call it The Peace Cup or something)