Alex Barnhart
@alexbarnhart.bsky.social
800 followers 300 following 110 posts
Lead Sound Designer @ Respawn Entertainment. My page is probably 99% angry rants about urban planning
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
I'll be there and so will a ton of the Jedi team! Stoked to catch up. Glad to hear things are on the up and up
Willl!!!!! Crazy it's been that long. Hope you're doing well and still crushing it
Hey y'all, we just posted a Sound Design intern position here on the Respawn Jedi team for Summer 2026! Come make some really cool stuff with us

*Caveat is you must be a student graduating no earlier than December 2026

jobs.ea.com/en_US/career...
Sound Design Intern, Summer 2026 (Jedi)
jobs.ea.com
In other news, I paid of my student loans so that's cool
Reposted by Alex Barnhart
Decades of unlimited local control over land use have left us with an historic housing shortage, unaffordable rents, homeownership out of reach for the middle class, and crisis-level homelessness.

Enough is enough. It’s time for the state to step in and set some basic ground rules by passing SB 79.
Here’s the clip of CM Padilla bragging about reducing the size of a 100% affordable housing project in her district and increasing the amount of parking while arguing against the transit oriented upzoning bill SB 79.

(ED 1 is an affordable housing program in LA.)
Reposted by Alex Barnhart
Jon Lovett’s face when LA City Councilmember Imelda Padilla said she forced an affordable housing project to go down from six stories to three stories and add in EV charging spaces
Been relearning how to draw after years of avoiding it. Here's a tree
Reposted by Alex Barnhart
The most impressive thing about this campaign is how *creative* they are. They’re trying new stuff! Multiple times during the last few months I’ve thought “wow, I’ve never seen a campaign do that.” Much more of that needed everywhere.
Reposted by Alex Barnhart
Karen Bass is an unhinged NIMBY and everyone still on the other site should ratio her
Reposted by Alex Barnhart
“Los Angeles leaders are once again demonstrating their cowardice and failing their own constituents who desperately need more housing—and they’re doing it at the behest of LA’s wealthiest, most entitled voters, who have consistently blocked progress on housing affordability.” - @hanlon.bsky.social
California YIMBY Statement on LA City Council Vote on SB 79
Los Angeles, CA — Today the Los Angeles City Council voted to oppose SB 79, a state bill designed to expand affordable housing near major transit stops. In doing so, councilmembers repeated discredite...
cayimby.org
Reposted by Alex Barnhart
It's 2018. The LA City Council is opposing SB827 because it overrides local control. Rent is $1,663

It's 2019. The LA City Council is opposing SB50 because it overrides local control. Rent is $1,791

It's 2025. The LA City Council is opposing SB79 because it overrides local control. Rent is $2,625
“Los Angeles leaders are once again demonstrating their cowardice and failing their own constituents who desperately need more housing—and they’re doing it at the behest of LA’s wealthiest, most entitled voters, who have consistently blocked progress on housing affordability.” - @hanlon.bsky.social
California YIMBY Statement on LA City Council Vote on SB 79
Los Angeles, CA — Today the Los Angeles City Council voted to oppose SB 79, a state bill designed to expand affordable housing near major transit stops. In doing so, councilmembers repeated discredite...
cayimby.org
Is private equity buying homes a problem? Yeah for sure, I hate BlackRock owning homes as much as the next person

Is that as big of a deal compared to the fact we simply don't have enough housing and have built up massive barriers to building housing? No, not really
btw, a point to keep in mind when you see the claim that private equity or Wall Street is pricing families out of homes:
Homeowner families have never owned a larger portion of the housing stock.
Reposted by Alex Barnhart
AAA estimates the average cost of owning a car is $12,297 a year, and recommends drivers spend no more than 10 percent of their income on car costs. This means you should make 120K to afford the average cost. Median *household* income in the US is $77K. The math just doesn't work.
Best thing to do is to write to your local leaders (city council, mayor, etc) about changing city code to allow for things like Single Stair Apartment buildings, upzoning R1 areas to allow for townhomes/duplexs/triplexes, abolishing parking minimums, etc and speeding up permitting for new housing
Today's affordable housing is the market rate housing that was built 20+ years ago etc. To make affordable housing now and in the future, we need to build housing period. That includes the kind of housing that's pissing you off. Most of Austin's housing that is driving rents down is this type
Here's a good video about specifically that idea. TLDR: Essentially higher income folks move into the "luxury" housing leaving vacancies for folks to move into the cheaper housing they currently live and so on and so on

www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbQA...
The Problem with "Luxury Housing"
YouTube video by About Here
www.youtube.com
Lack of diversity in housing options in what's being built is definitely a problem. A lot of that is in zoning codes and regulations (parking minimums etc). That being said, all of those apartments open up cheaper, older housing that otherwise would be taken by folks with the money to afford them
Anyways, that's my rant. Feel free to call me a developer shill or landlord sympathizer or something I guess. I just want more walkable cities and cheaper rents/mortgages
Fix the supply issue and companies like Blackrock have much less reason to buy and hold housing. Cities like Austin have been building and showing by example that building housing, even market rate housing, brings rents down for everyone.
Is corporate ownership an issue? Hell yeah and we should do something about it. Do companies like Blackrock explicitly say to investors the reason they are buying houses and apartments is because the US doesn't build enough supply thus making it a desirable commodity for them to invest in
Vienna is the classic example from the left of social housing done right and they deserve praise. The problem with that though is they actually built dense housing compared to cities like in the USA. Single family homes are the true luxury housing
Rent control is a great stop gap for stopping the immediate bleeding but long term all it does is trap people into staying in there current housing as the market around them skyrockets and makes it unfeasible to leave meaning the supply of rent controlled housing dwindles fast
I love affordable, non-market, social housing like the next lefty. I will always advocate for that. The problem is without removing the constraints that make it hard to build housing, there will never be enough housing to go around and only the luckiest or people who wait the longest get housing