Alfred Nobel
banner
alfrednobel.bsky.social
Alfred Nobel
@alfrednobel.bsky.social
Even if you assume that the brain is fully capable of explaining itself, you can still accelerate that process by using an explanatory model of all functional, behavioural perception processes.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nj-Mol/research
The fundamental error in this research is treating cognition as a single internal phenomenon. Real behavior requires the brain to mediate several autonomous phenomena at once — no one-system theory can ever explain that.
How do brain areas control each other? 🧠🎛️

✨In our NeurIPS 2025 Spotlight paper, we introduce a data-driven framework to answer this question using deep learning, nonlinear control, and differential geometry.🧵⬇️
November 26, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Horner’s conclusion has already been fully explained: the sequence items — the what — and the spatial structure between those items — the how — are both cognitive representations, with the what defined

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 26, 2025 at 7:22 PM
If you would only know how we drive cars. It is sad that I am the only one knowing it and neuroscience is not even interested.

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
(PDF) Car Driving Can Solely Be Produced Internally and Vision Solely Serves as an External Control Process - The underlying mechanisms of car driving and the Rubber Hand Illusion are identical
PDF | The Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) is traditionally interpreted as evidence that the brain can be misled about body ownership. However, when viewed... | Find, read and cite all the research you need...
www.researchgate.net
November 26, 2025 at 6:59 PM
Many omissions, misconceptions and fallacies.

The complete and final explanation is clarified in f.e. Pong:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 26, 2025 at 3:19 PM
Completely underpinned by:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 26, 2025 at 3:04 PM
Ditto. Only a pity that the stadion wave and its peak, like you mentioned in your presentation, were not debated. Like the marble gains no meaning without a marble run and vice versa, all parts can solely provide meaning when studied as one phenomenon.
November 26, 2025 at 12:55 PM
Ditto. Only a pity that the stadion wave and its peak, like you mentioned in your presentation, were not debated. Like the marble gains no meaning without a marble run and vice versa, all parts can solely provide meaning when studied as one phenomenon.
November 26, 2025 at 12:55 PM
Within the long jump the run up is identical to a marble in a marble run!!!:

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 26, 2025 at 12:15 PM
Scientists who consider themselves as being the top of the field within visual perception (VP) didn't even consider two very obvious phenomena:

1. VP, besides object recognition, is mainly there to sec discover if the object is moving, by comparing all adjacent
That image is from 1961 and an idealization. Here is an actual trajectory of fixational eye movements. The dots are 2 ms apart. If a midget ganglion cell, with single-cone receptive field, fires at 100 Hz, then every spike reports about a different cone. How can we ever read anything?
November 26, 2025 at 11:39 AM
Rosenholtz's clarification is the exact and final clarification of visual attention as completely explained in:

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 26, 2025 at 11:25 AM
The Rubber Hand Illusion is not an Illusion - The Illusion Evaporates the Moment the True Mechanism of Action-Perception Coupling Is Understood

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
(PDF) The Rubber Hand Illusion is not an Illusion - The Illusion Evaporates the Moment the True Mechanism of Action-Perception Coupling Is Understood
PDF | The Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) is widely interpreted as evidence that body ownership arises from multisensory integration of visual, tactile, and... | Find, read and cite all the research you ne...
www.researchgate.net
November 25, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Sorry for any inconvenience but I think this is very important.

Two very important questions in recent debates

@action-brain.bsky.social
@kordinglab.bsky.social
@earlkmiller.bsky.social
Yes, of course we need to know. The brain is doing it. There is a *large body of work* on oscillations that have revealed phenomena that have not been seen in spiking. Don't tell the brain how it works. Let the brain tell you.
November 25, 2025 at 6:19 PM
This has already been fully explained for quite some time now:

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 25, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Breaking:

The Rubber Hand Illusion reveals the initial coupling of the internal to the external focus during grasping.

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
(PDF) The Rubber Hand Illusion Reveals the Mechanism by Which the Two Autonomous Foci Become Coupled During Grasping
PDF | The Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) provides the clearest demonstration of how the visual and pro-prioceptive foci—two autonomous incompatible... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on Re...
www.researchgate.net
November 24, 2025 at 2:28 PM
From the day we understood blowing, we started talking. It is not that difficult.
November 23, 2025 at 12:35 PM
November 21, 2025 at 12:37 PM
Reposted by Alfred Nobel
Yes, science is stuck in regard to Gibson. Because:
1. You still consider one undivided action being present.
2. Gibson added the second .......

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 21, 2025 at 12:35 PM
Miller: "If your theory can't explain the data, the problem is the theory, not the data."

Very true. On the other hand data will never provide a theory.
When someone says, "epiphenominal", I hear, "doesn't fit my theory". I'm not going to tell the brain how it works. I'm going to let the brain tell me how it works. If your theory can't explain the data, the problem is the theory, not the data.
November 21, 2025 at 11:59 AM
Nice podcast but the crucial question still remains. What is represented in the PFC? – which neuroscience fails to answer for a few decades now.
When I say that cognition is external to the brain, people immediately walk away. So let me put it more clearly:
I want to express that cognition .....
November 20, 2025 at 4:30 PM
HELP ME PLEASE

When I say that cognition is external to the brain, people immediately walk away. So let me put it more clearly:
I want to express that cognition does not arise inside the brain — or that we should change what we mean by cognition. Cognition emerges when new external sensory ...
November 20, 2025 at 2:17 PM
The Complete Mechanistic Clarification of The Rubber Hand Illusion -
Why External and Internal Hand Perception Are Autonomous and Cannot Be Unified Without Motor Action

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
(PDF) The Complete Mechanistic Clarification of The Rubber Hand Illusion - Why External and Internal Hand Perception Are Autonomous and Cannot Be Unified Without Motor Action
PDF | The Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) has become one of the most frequently used paradigms in research on body ownership and self-perception. Numerous... | Find, read and cite all the research you need...
www.researchgate.net
November 19, 2025 at 8:51 PM
BREAKING BREAKING BREAKING

@dgonschorek.bsky.social
@teuler.bsky.social

BREAKING BREAKING BREAKING

To scientifically support the Telephone Model / Gramophone Model — and to show that cognition/consciousness may be external to the brain.....

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 19, 2025 at 12:04 PM
How cognition is enabled by the brain but completely external to the brain is f.e. completely explained in the game of Pong:

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 18, 2025 at 11:03 PM