Allegedly a Switch
@allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
140 followers 170 following 890 posts
🔞 MDNI https://fetlife.com/users/787307 Got questions? https://ngl.link/allegedlyswitchy
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
It's the GOP playbook.
This is Republican values and priorities on display, in action, unmasked and fully unfettered.
This is what you vote for when you vote for a Republican, any Republican.
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
And once again the Cass Review is revealed to be nothing more than a Regnerus style agenda driven shitshow without a shred of credibility.

It was created to legitimize transphobia, and is now being used to that purpose. It is also amplified by the professional concern troll like Jesse Singal.
#LGBT
erininthemorning.com
1. A new journal report in the prestigious Medical Journal of Australia eviscerates the Cass review, saying it is filled with fallacies and launders anti-trans disinformation.

It methodically goes through each problem in the review.

The latest from S. Baum.

Subscribe to support our journalism
New Journal Report: Cass Review “Echoes Fallacies Promoted By Anti-Trans Disinformation”
While American lawyers pushed the anti-trans Cass Review this week, Australia’s top scholars rebuked it.
www.erininthemorning.com
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
Neither do I, but watching that trainwreck with more bodies in the box than anywhere else was strangely soothing
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
Did you watch that Florida on Florida violence last week?
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
About as believable as that cement milkshake
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
It fits!
Also, according to my husband, you look like Pedro Pascal right now.
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
He is "not against GAC for minors" the same way Baroness Cass is not against GAC, meaning that his work, and fruits thereof, including it's use to prohibit/ prevent access to GAC for minors with not a peep out of him, speaks for itself.
That's the entire point of the concern troll strategy.
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
(2 of 2) And instead of actually learning the subject matter and reading the plethora of available research, Signal chose to cherry pick only the studies that support his biases and concern troll by focusing on outliers and "just asking questions" with a singular aim of deligitimizing GAC for minors
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
I understand that you're giving Signal the benefit of the double here, I did initially as well. But the fact of the matter is that there are hundreds of studies, going back decades, that support GAC for minors. There are well researched and established standards of GAC for minors. ( 1 of 2)
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
She's a lovely Void.
I personally have a Stripus.
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
Nah man, I don't buy it. He has disingenuously positioned himself as an expert on GAC for minors, has beaten the anti access drum for a decade without any positive coverage, outright lied at least once, and misrepresented data.
That's deliberate, focused, agenda driven advocacy, not journalism.
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
"Structural issues" is the same excuse for cherry picking used by the Cass Review, which was roundly denounced for that.

And yes, he ignores the tried and tested established protocols and studies, and even the newer ones, like the Utah one, if they support gender affirming care for minors.
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
He hasn't outright said it, but look at his last 10 yrs of work. No positive articles, outright lies about a kid getting on hormones after a 10 min consult, ignoring studies that don't support his own drumbeat and providing sources to ADF. And no trying to distance himself from the results.
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
The only "treatment" for trans minors I've not seen him question is anti trans conversion therapy, aimed at coercing desistance. Everything else is undermined as unproven, experimental, and "just too much", despite decades of studies and data. Those are ignored becuse they don't fit his biases.
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
Jesse's entire point over the past 10 yrs has been to concern troll and deligitimize gender affirming care for minors with the aim of getting it banned. That's why he fixates on detransitioners and ignores any evidence that doesn't fit his bias (like the Utah study).
He's a 1 man Cass Report.
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
I would hesitate to label Brutus a troll, where Jesse hasn't provided any solid statements at all, just his usual "Just questioning" and " it's fraught", and then brings up a singular case of allegations where the response from the provider has been in line with Brutus' point.
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
Wait, are you Jesse? Because they were talking with Singal, it looked like.
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
One, singular filed case does not, and should not justify the wholesale restrictions on any and all gender affirming care for minors that is championed by Signal and his fellow travelers.
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
I cannot endorse this proposed abuse of cake. The cake did nothing wrong. 😝
allegedlyswitchy.bsky.social
Oh look, after fashioning himself into a faux "expert" on trans medicine and producing voluminous "just asking questions" screeds and lies that were successfully used by his anti trans fellow travelers, Jesse is now pretending to be a legal analyst to avoid acknowledging the impact of his writings