Ben Eidelson
LightNews LightNews
banner
beidelson.bsky.social
Ben Eidelson
@beidelson.bsky.social
7.8K followers 210 following 57 posts
Professor, Harvard Law School
https://hls.harvard.edu/faculty/benjamin-eidelson
Posts Replies Media Videos
beidelson.bsky.social
A nice write up about Case Viewer, my legal browser app: hls.harvard.edu/today/harvar...

If you have an iPhone, iPad, or Mac and haven't tried it, you should! Learn more at www.caseviewer.app, follow @caseviewerapp.bsky.social, or download for free from app store: apps.apple.com/app/apple-st...
Harvard Law professor launches Case Viewer app for easier access to court decisions - Harvard Law School
Harvard Law Professor Ben Eidelson tapped into a childhood passion to build a tool for lawyers and law students.
hls.harvard.edu
November 11, 2025 at 1:13 PM
beidelson.bsky.social
Based on the @theharvardcrimson.bsky.social's new reporting, Harvard's commitment to scrubbing discussion of race from the admissions process (left) appears to go far beyond what the conservative Supreme Court majority actually required in SFFA (right).
October 27, 2025 at 3:51 PM
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
caseviewerapp.bsky.social
Check out the latest version of Case Viewer on the App Store — now with detailed AI annotations, on iPhone, iPad, and macOS

apps.apple.com/app/apple-st...
October 9, 2025 at 6:33 PM
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
jamalgreene.bsky.social
Kagan’s short dissent is unanswerable.
September 22, 2025 at 8:03 PM
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
free.law
Case Viewer is one of those tools you didn't know you needed. Apple-only for now, but it brings a simple, clean interface to reading case law, and it's finally out of beta!

We're proud to have our APIs and data integrated into the tool and we encourage folks to give it a try!
caseviewerapp.bsky.social Case Viewer @caseviewerapp.bsky.social · Sep 5
Some of Case Viewer's features are powered by the amazing data from @free.law (CourtListener). Two examples:
1. a D.C. Cir. case with embedded oral argument audio & info on all the participating judges.
2. An 8th Cir. slip opinion filed today and not yet available in almost any other database.
September 5, 2025 at 4:25 PM
beidelson.bsky.social
Case Viewer, my quirky side project of building my ideal legal search & reading app, has come a long way. With lots of help, it's grown into the best way to find & read cases on a Mac, iPhone, or iPad. Check it out or download on the App Store below. And follow @CaseViewerApp for updates!
September 4, 2025 at 3:37 PM
beidelson.bsky.social
Even with its professed limits, Trump’s flag-burning order appears blatantly unconstitutional. “Prosecute disfavored acts of expression insofar as they also constitute criminal acts under some content-neutral law” is not content-neutral. @charliesavage.bsky.social

www.nytimes.com/live/2025/08...
Trump Administration Live Updates: President’s Order on Burning Flag Reveals Its Own Limits
www.nytimes.com
August 25, 2025 at 11:48 PM
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
heidikitrosser.bsky.social
When you’re so busy crowing about your political motivations that you forget to pretend you did it for the Jews.
atrupar.com Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · Jul 24
Linda McMahon on Columbia settlement: "This is a monumental victory for conservatives who wanted to do things on these elite campuses for a long time because we had such far left-leaning professors."
July 24, 2025 at 12:32 PM
beidelson.bsky.social
I have learned a ton from engaging across differences with Sherif and this essay is a wonderful example. Highly recommended!
sherifgirgis.bsky.social Sherif Girgis @sherifgirgis.bsky.social · Jul 11
I gave a talk (in 2013) about when/why academics should & shouldn't care about intellectual diversity. More personal than my usual fare (& the most readable thing I've written--not saying that's a high bar)... 1/9
x.com/JoyceCarolOa...
Joyce Carol Oates on X: "most universities & colleges surely have faculty members who are contrarians? liberals & progressives are always quarreling with one another; "the left eats its own"; hiring conservatives per se will result in very lop-sided resumés especially in the sciences. really, research" / X
most universities & colleges surely have faculty members who are contrarians? liberals & progressives are always quarreling with one another; "the left eats its own"; hiring conservatives per se will result in very lop-sided resumés especially in the sciences. really, research
x.com
July 11, 2025 at 11:29 AM
beidelson.bsky.social
As I explain in this @bostonglobe.com op-ed, the new Trump ruling on antisemitism at Harvard is deeply ironic—it quietly embraces ideas about anti-discrimination law that the administration has repudiated for civil rights claims by every other group. (1/3)

www.bostonglobe.com/2025/07/03/o...
Trump goes ‘woke’ in report on antisemitism at Harvard - The Boston Globe
What is most striking is the brazen hypocrisy — one might even say chutzpah — of the Trump lawyers’ arguments.
www.bostonglobe.com
July 3, 2025 at 2:33 PM
beidelson.bsky.social
A stunning and telling error in the Title VI "notice of violation" against Harvard:

One of the document's most striking claims is that Harvard ignored "reports of Jewish and Israeli students being spit on in the face for wearing a yarmulke." This is repeated in their letter & in news coverage.(1/3)
June 30, 2025 at 8:02 PM
beidelson.bsky.social
Reading the Title VI "notice of violation" against Harvard makes stark that, to a large extent, the target is not antisemitism (not even trumped up claims of antisemitism) but protests. Where in these descriptions of alleged misconduct is the discrimination against Jewish (or Israeli) students?
June 30, 2025 at 6:20 PM
beidelson.bsky.social
There is much that's far-fetched and remarkable about Trump admin's new Title VI finding against Harvard. One example is this bizarre bit about why claims in Harvard's antisemitism report can be treated as evidence—despite the task force's explanation that it 'did not require ... evidence'! (1/2)
June 30, 2025 at 4:37 PM
beidelson.bsky.social
This Ogles letter is deranged and incompetent on many levels. The Supreme Court addressed the standard for denaturalization in a unanimous opinion less than a decade ago and every one of the many elements it required is absent. Reporters covering this stunt should tell their readers as much.
paleofuture.bsky.social Matt Novak @paleofuture.bsky.social · Jun 26
Rep. Andy Ogles, a Republican from Tennessee, has sent a letter to Pam Bondi calling for Zohran Mamdani to be stripped of his citizenship and deported.
Andy Ogles: Zohran "little muhammad" Mamdani is an antisemitic, socialist, communist who will destroy the great City of New York. He needs to be DEPORTED. Which is why I am calling for him to be subject to denaturalization proceedings. Attached is my letter to @AGPamBondi.
June 26, 2025 at 8:05 PM
beidelson.bsky.social
"Antisemitism, Anti-Zionism, and Title VI: A Guide for the Perplexed" is now out: tinyurl.com/3wpvbnzu

Thanks to HLR editors for fast & diligent editing and to the many who've engaged with us since we posted the draft. And of course to @hellmandeborah.bsky.social for another great collaboration.
June 24, 2025 at 1:45 PM
beidelson.bsky.social
Some takeaways from our new article on Title VI and antisemitism/antizionism (cc @hellmandeborah.bsky.social) in this @chronicle.com Q&A with @shenandoahkate.bsky.social. Full paper: ssrn.com/abstract=527...
June 2, 2025 at 2:08 PM
beidelson.bsky.social
Trump's renunciation of disparate impact is ironic: As @hellmandeborah.bsky.social and I explain in new paper, the disparate impact regulation is likely essential to any plausible Title VI theory re: campus antisemitism. Reporters should ask if they're making an exception!

ssrn.com/abstract=527...
Discrimination cases unravel as Trump scraps core civil rights tenet
The administration is dismissing cases and unwinding settlements built on "disparate impact," which holds that even neutral policies can lead to biased outcomes.
www.washingtonpost.com
June 1, 2025 at 6:05 PM
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
fishkin.bsky.social
I appreciate what @beidelson.bsky.social & @hellmandeborah.bsky.social have accomplished here: a concise and thoughtful guide to the reach of Title VI when it comes to antisemitism and speech about Israel.

The Trump Administration's attacks on universities, supposedly regarding antisemitism, are...
beidelson.bsky.social Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · May 27
New paper: "Antisemitism, Anti-Zionism, and Title VI: A Guide for the Perplexed" — with @hellmandeborah.bsky.social.

Forthcoming in Harv L Rev Forum (ssrn.com/abstract=5271044)

This is one of the first systematic analyses of the wave of Title VI claims over campus antisemitism. A quick summary 🧵:
ANTISEMITISM, ANTI-ZIONISM, AND TITLE VI: A GUIDE FOR THE PERPLEXED Benjamin Eidelson & Deborah Hellman ABSTRACT Universities are facing an unprecedented wave of claims that they have violated their obligations to Jewish students under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. These charges center on an equally unprecedented wave of anti-Israel activity on college campuses, much of which is alleged to cross the line into antisemitism. This essay, forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review Forum, provides one of the first systematic analyses of these exceptionally high-stakes claims about Title VI. Our analysis reveals that the Title VI claims face formidable hurdles, including some that have received surprisingly little attention thus far. Most fundamentally, Title VI’s omission of “religion” as a protected characteristic means that Jewishness is protected under the statute only insofar as it constitutes a “race” or (less likely) a “national origin.” Under existing law, however, discrimination based on the cultural practices or viewpoints that may be associated with such an immutable characteristic—as Zionism might be associated with Jewishnessis ordinarily not cognizable as discrimination based on the protected characteristic itself. Moreover, if “hostile environment” liability can be founded on offensive conduct that does not constitute covered disparate treatment in its own right, this is likely possible only pursuant to a disparate impact theory that the Trump Administration has denounced and that the Supreme Court has rejected for private suits. Any notion of harassment based on conduct’s “objective offensiveness” would also need to account for distinctive features of the university setting that likely preclude liability for much of the protest activity that has loomed large in recent public discussions of Jewish students’ experiences on campus. Although specific facts matter and not all of the issues are clear-cut, we thus conclude that appeals to Title VI in
May 28, 2025 at 5:10 AM
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
jamalgreene.bsky.social
Very important guide for navigating the complexities here, including especially the nature of "deliberate indifference" in the context of a deeply contested mix of values and rights at stake.
beidelson.bsky.social Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · May 27
New paper: "Antisemitism, Anti-Zionism, and Title VI: A Guide for the Perplexed" — with @hellmandeborah.bsky.social.

Forthcoming in Harv L Rev Forum (ssrn.com/abstract=5271044)

This is one of the first systematic analyses of the wave of Title VI claims over campus antisemitism. A quick summary 🧵:
ANTISEMITISM, ANTI-ZIONISM, AND TITLE VI: A GUIDE FOR THE PERPLEXED Benjamin Eidelson & Deborah Hellman ABSTRACT Universities are facing an unprecedented wave of claims that they have violated their obligations to Jewish students under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. These charges center on an equally unprecedented wave of anti-Israel activity on college campuses, much of which is alleged to cross the line into antisemitism. This essay, forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review Forum, provides one of the first systematic analyses of these exceptionally high-stakes claims about Title VI. Our analysis reveals that the Title VI claims face formidable hurdles, including some that have received surprisingly little attention thus far. Most fundamentally, Title VI’s omission of “religion” as a protected characteristic means that Jewishness is protected under the statute only insofar as it constitutes a “race” or (less likely) a “national origin.” Under existing law, however, discrimination based on the cultural practices or viewpoints that may be associated with such an immutable characteristic—as Zionism might be associated with Jewishnessis ordinarily not cognizable as discrimination based on the protected characteristic itself. Moreover, if “hostile environment” liability can be founded on offensive conduct that does not constitute covered disparate treatment in its own right, this is likely possible only pursuant to a disparate impact theory that the Trump Administration has denounced and that the Supreme Court has rejected for private suits. Any notion of harassment based on conduct’s “objective offensiveness” would also need to account for distinctive features of the university setting that likely preclude liability for much of the protest activity that has loomed large in recent public discussions of Jewish students’ experiences on campus. Although specific facts matter and not all of the issues are clear-cut, we thus conclude that appeals to Title VI in
May 27, 2025 at 5:52 PM
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
hellmandeborah.bsky.social
New to Bluesky, and posting a new paper: "Antisemitism, Anti-Zionism, and Title VI: A Guide for the Perplexed" -- with @beidelson.bsky.social.

Forthcoming in Harv. L. Rev. Forum in June. (papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....).

A thread follows.
May 27, 2025 at 6:30 PM
beidelson.bsky.social
New paper: "Antisemitism, Anti-Zionism, and Title VI: A Guide for the Perplexed" — with @hellmandeborah.bsky.social.

Forthcoming in Harv L Rev Forum (ssrn.com/abstract=5271044)

This is one of the first systematic analyses of the wave of Title VI claims over campus antisemitism. A quick summary 🧵:
ANTISEMITISM, ANTI-ZIONISM, AND TITLE VI: A GUIDE FOR THE PERPLEXED Benjamin Eidelson & Deborah Hellman ABSTRACT Universities are facing an unprecedented wave of claims that they have violated their obligations to Jewish students under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. These charges center on an equally unprecedented wave of anti-Israel activity on college campuses, much of which is alleged to cross the line into antisemitism. This essay, forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review Forum, provides one of the first systematic analyses of these exceptionally high-stakes claims about Title VI. Our analysis reveals that the Title VI claims face formidable hurdles, including some that have received surprisingly little attention thus far. Most fundamentally, Title VI’s omission of “religion” as a protected characteristic means that Jewishness is protected under the statute only insofar as it constitutes a “race” or (less likely) a “national origin.” Under existing law, however, discrimination based on the cultural practices or viewpoints that may be associated with such an immutable characteristic—as Zionism might be associated with Jewishnessis ordinarily not cognizable as discrimination based on the protected characteristic itself. Moreover, if “hostile environment” liability can be founded on offensive conduct that does not constitute covered disparate treatment in its own right, this is likely possible only pursuant to a disparate impact theory that the Trump Administration has denounced and that the Supreme Court has rejected for private suits. Any notion of harassment based on conduct’s “objective offensiveness” would also need to account for distinctive features of the university setting that likely preclude liability for much of the protest activity that has loomed large in recent public discussions of Jewish students’ experiences on campus. Although specific facts matter and not all of the issues are clear-cut, we thus conclude that appeals to Title VI in
May 27, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
hellmandeborah.bsky.social
I've just joined BlueSky and need help from friends to gather followers. So @uvalaw.bsky.social, and other faculty and students, please share/follow. I write about discrimination law and its philosophical foundations and about bribery and corruption. Am interested in all things law and philosophy.
May 27, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
ggkrishnamoomoo.bsky.social
Mitch Berman is the among the best on unconstitutional conditions: wapo.st/4jliBSO
Opinion | No, Trump can’t force his agenda on U.S. entities. They have rights.
The government cannot withhold benefits because it doesn’t like how people exercise their rights.
wapo.st
May 24, 2025 at 12:23 PM
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
martylederman.bsky.social
Essential reading, from Jenner's Adam Unikowsky. Not only does Adam pull together all of the reasons why the E.O.s are patently illegal and profoundly dangerous; he also explains ... [1]

adamunikowsky.substack.com/p/the-case-f...
The case for suing
Why law firms should remain independent from the government
adamunikowsky.substack.com
April 10, 2025 at 1:29 PM