Damien Teney
@damienteney.bsky.social
460 followers 290 following 140 posts
Research Scientist @ Idiap Research Institute. @idiap.bsky.social Adjunct lecturer @ Australian Institute for ML. @aimlofficial.bsky.social Occasionally cycling across continents. https://www.damienteney.info
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
damienteney.bsky.social
Academic Strava?🤓 It feels like an underrepresented group in my Strava feed!
damienteney.bsky.social
It'd be nice to provide complete analyses (that you have precomputed) of existing papers, so we can see what kind of output the tool provides, without having to submit any of my own work.
damienteney.bsky.social
Dang it just never ends 😱
damienteney.bsky.social
In this setting, does the student (sometimes?) get better than the teacher? One hypothesis could be that the teacher, even if "less correct" than the GT, provides supervision that's easier to learn for another NN (the student). The optimization follows a less tortuous path & finds a better solution.
damienteney.bsky.social
👍 I had my very first paper published at DAGM. It was a while ago but I remember it as a very welcoming conference.
damienteney.bsky.social
🔎Last but not least: OOD-Chameleon shines new light on existing algorithms! We can interpret the selection process as a tree and get interpretable guidelines for choosing algorithms.
damienteney.bsky.social
✅We test OOD-Chameleon on unseen datasets & shifts: it accurately predict suitable algorithms on synthetic, vision, and language tasks. The downstream models (trained with selected algorithms) consistently have lower error than with standard selection heuristics.
damienteney.bsky.social
🛠️To create our "dataset of datasets", we resample CelebA and CivilComments with constraints specifying diverse types/magnitudes of shifts. We also train small models with candidate algorithms to obtain their "ground truth performance" in each condition.
damienteney.bsky.social
🦎We propose OOD-Chameleon as a proof-of-concept: an algorithm selector as a classifier (over candidate algorithms) trained on a "dataset of datasets" representing diverse shifts. The model learns which algorithms perform best in different conditions.
damienteney.bsky.social
💡We're aiming for an "auto-ML for distribution shifts". We conjecture that datasets have properties predictive of the suitability of various algorithms to handle dist. shifts: size/complexity of the data, magnitudes/types of shifts, etc.
damienteney.bsky.social
"Distribution shift" means many things: spurious correlations, covariate shift, label shift... with no one-size-fits-all! Many algorithms exist, 📊each for specific conditions. Could we automate the selection without trial-and-error❓
damienteney.bsky.social
Coming up at ICML: 🤯Distribution shifts are still a huge challenge in ML. There's already a ton of algorithms to address specific conditions. So what if the challenge was just selecting the right algorithm for the right conditions?🤔🧵
damienteney.bsky.social
On the contrary it's a discussion that needs bringing up inside the CV research community. They're not just a bunch of white dudes with evil intentions or industry pressure to build a surveillance state. As one example see the thoughts from one such researcher lucasb.eyer.be/snips/cv-eth...
Ethical considerations around Vision and Robotics
A rough outline on how I think about doing research in Computer Vision given the many possible unethical uses.
lucasb.eyer.be
damienteney.bsky.social
Brilliant! Some pushback I heard against mandatory reviewing was from people misunderstanding that a submission entails such a partnership with the rest of the community.
damienteney.bsky.social
Looks quiet! Best time of day 👌🏼
damienteney.bsky.social
Good points. It's a difficult task to automate the classification of papers/patents. Would the tracking of hands/gestures for sign language interfaces count as surveillance here?
damienteney.bsky.social
Because it discredits and could silence an entire area of scientific inquiry. Inclusive access to technology would tremedously benefit from CV technologies, so surveillance-based commercialization is only one part of the conversation.
damienteney.bsky.social
There's a healthy amount of skepticism to be had when reading any paper, whatever level of peer-review it got through. Just like I wouldn't blindly trust a CVPR or NeurIPS paper claiming to beat the SOTA, because the authors were motivated to do so. Happy to continue the discussion elsewhere.
damienteney.bsky.social
I'd be an important topic worth addressing more deeply within the CV community! We'd need more data on dual use and on beneficial application of the technology as well.
damienteney.bsky.social
Indeed, when reading the scientific literature, even with any amount of scrutiny and peer review, you ultimately have to trust the authors that they did their due diligence and didn't cut corners to arrive at their desired conclusions.
damienteney.bsky.social
I'm open to any finding, there's no place for feelings when interpreting data. But I'm not sure this was the case for the authors. It's difficult to trust this paper because it feels like a piece of activism rather than an unbiased scientific study.
damienteney.bsky.social
Good for you. I said *most*, and was just reflecting on typical members of the community from the CV venues studied in the paper.
damienteney.bsky.social
I think it's to the detriment of the authors, bc such a biased activist message will be ignored by most of the very ppl (CV researchers) that the information could have an effect on. This should have been presented at a CV conference if they were hoping for actual impact. @abeba.bsky.social