May be cranky.
https://law.stanford.edu/daphne-keller/
www.scotusblog.com/2026/02/the-...
www.scotusblog.com/2026/02/the-...
The agency should leave speech to the discretion of speakers, where it belongs, and stick to issues within its jurisdiction.
The agency should leave speech to the discretion of speakers, where it belongs, and stick to issues within its jurisdiction.
A major and unique backdrop here is that X (1) used to offer all this data to researchers in its API and (2) continues to offer it to anyone willing to pay.
A major and unique backdrop here is that X (1) used to offer all this data to researchers in its API and (2) continues to offer it to anyone willing to pay.
www.usajobs.gov/job/856161000
But also, watching someone call these “free speech warriors” on their sheer rank hypocrisy will be a joy.
But also, watching someone call these “free speech warriors” on their sheer rank hypocrisy will be a joy.
www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
@riana.bsky.social's letter
cyberlaw.stanford.edu/letter-to-nc...
more from @masnick.com www.techdirt.com/2026/02/02/s...
@riana.bsky.social's letter
cyberlaw.stanford.edu/letter-to-nc...
more from @masnick.com www.techdirt.com/2026/02/02/s...
news.bloomberglaw.com/product/blaw...
news.bloomberglaw.com/product/blaw...
Howard County chose dignity, accountability, and its people. Tune into our event now:
bit.ly/4a2VtHw
They literally *conditioned a merger* on advertisers' agreement to spend money in accordance with the administration's preferences about speech.
They literally *conditioned a merger* on advertisers' agreement to spend money in accordance with the administration's preferences about speech.
Mine has always been that 2016ish saw two big "voluntary" platform concessions intended to ward off regulation: the Hate Speech Code of Conduct and the launch of GIFCT. 1/
Mine has always been that 2016ish saw two big "voluntary" platform concessions intended to ward off regulation: the Hate Speech Code of Conduct and the launch of GIFCT. 1/
That seems bonkers to me, but I hadn’t realized it was such an outlier nationally.
That seems bonkers to me, but I hadn’t realized it was such an outlier nationally.
The secondary one is "most of the core protocols were designed by researchers who implicitly trusted each other, security is at best bolted on after the fact".
Frankly, the entire Internet is made of duct tape and popsicle sticks held together by bubble gum and string and it’s amazing that anything ever works at all
The secondary one is "most of the core protocols were designed by researchers who implicitly trusted each other, security is at best bolted on after the fact".
As @daphnek.bsky.social has previously examined, ChatGPT DSA advice heavily skews towards takedowns/filtering (what many erroneously think) and not what the law actually says.
h/t eupolicy.social/@ilumium