Trumps own supporters are scolding him for his mean tweet.
How do the hysterical Left square this with 'fascist dictator' etc?
How do the hysterical Left square this with 'fascist dictator' etc?
Although Trump’s abhorrent political beliefs are ultimately more damaging to the nation, his reprehensible personality is more shocking to me on a personal level.
I can’t fathom how anyone can support someone who is so obviously a terrible human being.
I can’t fathom how anyone can support someone who is so obviously a terrible human being.
December 16, 2025 at 3:09 AM
Trumps own supporters are scolding him for his mean tweet.
How do the hysterical Left square this with 'fascist dictator' etc?
How do the hysterical Left square this with 'fascist dictator' etc?
Reposted by Deep Code Audits
Reposted by Deep Code Audits
'We left a website where people disagreed with us, therefore we resisted Nazism' -- This is the moral vocabulary of a class that no longer does anything real.
A case study in elite epistemic collapse->
A frightened clergy raging at the ungoverned public square.
Deserves a full audit.
A case study in elite epistemic collapse->
A frightened clergy raging at the ungoverned public square.
Deserves a full audit.
December 8, 2025 at 2:47 AM
'We left a website where people disagreed with us, therefore we resisted Nazism' -- This is the moral vocabulary of a class that no longer does anything real.
A case study in elite epistemic collapse->
A frightened clergy raging at the ungoverned public square.
Deserves a full audit.
A case study in elite epistemic collapse->
A frightened clergy raging at the ungoverned public square.
Deserves a full audit.
Reposted by Deep Code Audits
Instead of: meaning → law
it becomes: law → meaning.
When the public responds with:
cynicism
counter-radicalisation
withdrawal from civic trust
accelerationist speech
The state responds with:
more criminalisation
more restrictions
more fear-based legislation...
This is a dangerous feedback loop
it becomes: law → meaning.
When the public responds with:
cynicism
counter-radicalisation
withdrawal from civic trust
accelerationist speech
The state responds with:
more criminalisation
more restrictions
more fear-based legislation...
This is a dangerous feedback loop
December 8, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Instead of: meaning → law
it becomes: law → meaning.
When the public responds with:
cynicism
counter-radicalisation
withdrawal from civic trust
accelerationist speech
The state responds with:
more criminalisation
more restrictions
more fear-based legislation...
This is a dangerous feedback loop
it becomes: law → meaning.
When the public responds with:
cynicism
counter-radicalisation
withdrawal from civic trust
accelerationist speech
The state responds with:
more criminalisation
more restrictions
more fear-based legislation...
This is a dangerous feedback loop
Pure evil. A society that frames itself as “humanist” while normalising death as a policy solution is playing with the same structural logic that underwrote the Aktion T4 programme: life re-priced as a cost, dignity reduced to managerial criteria, mercy weaponised by institutions.
It's important to write to peers right now, and let them know exactly how you feel about this. Please, scrutiny is important, but attempts to run down the clock are undemocratic. Write to peers today. #AssistedDyingBill
humanists.uk/action/ask-t...
humanists.uk/action/ask-t...
December 15, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Pure evil. A society that frames itself as “humanist” while normalising death as a policy solution is playing with the same structural logic that underwrote the Aktion T4 programme: life re-priced as a cost, dignity reduced to managerial criteria, mercy weaponised by institutions.
Anonymity is threatening to the Leftist because it breaks the moral sorting machinery: it can’t be punished, status-scored, or narrativised, forcing a return to raw logos instead of compliance.
When you subordinate truth to coordination and norm enforcement, unlocatable speech feels like sabotage.
When you subordinate truth to coordination and norm enforcement, unlocatable speech feels like sabotage.
December 15, 2025 at 6:19 PM
Anonymity is threatening to the Leftist because it breaks the moral sorting machinery: it can’t be punished, status-scored, or narrativised, forcing a return to raw logos instead of compliance.
When you subordinate truth to coordination and norm enforcement, unlocatable speech feels like sabotage.
When you subordinate truth to coordination and norm enforcement, unlocatable speech feels like sabotage.
Cultural discourse enshittification: nothing says "rigorous scientist" like playground-level name-calling.
This is elite resentment from a state-funded commentator envious of self-made disruptors who bypassed academic gatekeeping.
This is elite resentment from a state-funded commentator envious of self-made disruptors who bypassed academic gatekeeping.
December 15, 2025 at 6:16 PM
Cultural discourse enshittification: nothing says "rigorous scientist" like playground-level name-calling.
This is elite resentment from a state-funded commentator envious of self-made disruptors who bypassed academic gatekeeping.
This is elite resentment from a state-funded commentator envious of self-made disruptors who bypassed academic gatekeeping.
Why is Sunder trying to silence criticism of Islam (an ideology) the day after an Islamic terrorist attack?
The government is due to release its work and definition of anti-Muslim hatred in the coming days. Some tests of success from a column in March, when the process began
www.easterneye.biz/islamophobia...
www.easterneye.biz/islamophobia...
Comment: Defining Islamophobia a long overdue challenge
'Efforts must be made to protect free speech while tackling prejudice'
www.easterneye.biz
December 15, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Why is Sunder trying to silence criticism of Islam (an ideology) the day after an Islamic terrorist attack?
Irony alert: Gabriel perfectly illustrates the elite condescension that makes many English feel their historic culture is being devalued & silenced.
This aggressive policing of majority identity with moral posing to his in-group fuels the very resentment he claims doesn't exist.
This aggressive policing of majority identity with moral posing to his in-group fuels the very resentment he claims doesn't exist.
December 15, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Irony alert: Gabriel perfectly illustrates the elite condescension that makes many English feel their historic culture is being devalued & silenced.
This aggressive policing of majority identity with moral posing to his in-group fuels the very resentment he claims doesn't exist.
This aggressive policing of majority identity with moral posing to his in-group fuels the very resentment he claims doesn't exist.
Father and son.
Family-based terror is a feature of Pakistani rape gangs in the UK too.
Family-based terror is a feature of Pakistani rape gangs in the UK too.
Minute by depraved minute, how the Bondi Beach terror attack unfolded as father-and-son gunmen massacred 15 people during anti-Semitic rampage trib.al/d1rJivO
www.dailymail.co.uk
December 15, 2025 at 3:35 PM
Father and son.
Family-based terror is a feature of Pakistani rape gangs in the UK too.
Family-based terror is a feature of Pakistani rape gangs in the UK too.
I've seen some talk suggesting Brian Cox's wife not entirely happy with Robin telling her that a bearded man in a dress is literally the same as her. No doubt Brian struggles to reconcile this with 'science' too...
December 15, 2025 at 2:09 AM
I've seen some talk suggesting Brian Cox's wife not entirely happy with Robin telling her that a bearded man in a dress is literally the same as her. No doubt Brian struggles to reconcile this with 'science' too...
Katwala insists the state silence a journalist and dictate who he can interview. This is the most extreme authoritarianism coming home to roost. For all the Left's whining about fascism, they certainly seem to like running their playbook.
A simple approach would be to tell Mr Cole that he can choose to interview the most overt racists in our country (a man who'd chuck 90 MPs out of our parliament out on racist grounds & ban them from being civil servants) or to ask to interview government ministers - but that he can't do both.
December 15, 2025 at 1:41 AM
Katwala insists the state silence a journalist and dictate who he can interview. This is the most extreme authoritarianism coming home to roost. For all the Left's whining about fascism, they certainly seem to like running their playbook.
Going from calling people names on twitter, to calling people names on a much smaller platform, is unlikely going to be a successful tactic towards... whatever Sunder's goals are.
Talk TV appear to have an editorial policy based on hypocrisy and cowardice, describing as reprehensible views that they actively seek to platform, while denying that when asked
December 14, 2025 at 11:39 PM
Going from calling people names on twitter, to calling people names on a much smaller platform, is unlikely going to be a successful tactic towards... whatever Sunder's goals are.
Reposted by Deep Code Audits
Some luck in Portugal
December 14, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Some luck in Portugal
Yes Sunder, the confusion is because you can never actually present a rational argument. You assume your social group shaming is self-evident, yet it appears you confuse even your own like-minded ideologues!
So how about rational argument, for a change. Can you? Are you capable? One doubts.
So how about rational argument, for a change. Can you? Are you capable? One doubts.
I think it was clear that I am very much criticising Tomlinson's views as racist and challenging TalkTV and Cole platforming such extreme views (and in such a soft way). But this reply suggests that wasn't clear & suggests I need to do more than to hint that I am opposed to racism & to call it out
You’re still platforming him to your followers and taking him as some sort of person worth listening to without an equivocal upfront condemnation, so no I don’t think I’m missing the point, I think you’re happy to play sensible moderate hinting at but never calling out racism outright.
December 14, 2025 at 11:31 PM
Yes Sunder, the confusion is because you can never actually present a rational argument. You assume your social group shaming is self-evident, yet it appears you confuse even your own like-minded ideologues!
So how about rational argument, for a change. Can you? Are you capable? One doubts.
So how about rational argument, for a change. Can you? Are you capable? One doubts.
Anyone know what this is about? Is it the biology denial?
December 14, 2025 at 11:22 PM
Anyone know what this is about? Is it the biology denial?
Breakup is a symptom of the collapse of Fiat Normativity & will continue because the informational environment that 20th structures are adapted to no longer exists.
mantecanaut.substack.com/p/the-collap...
mantecanaut.substack.com/p/the-collap...
December 12, 2025 at 5:20 PM
Breakup is a symptom of the collapse of Fiat Normativity & will continue because the informational environment that 20th structures are adapted to no longer exists.
mantecanaut.substack.com/p/the-collap...
mantecanaut.substack.com/p/the-collap...
Reposted by Deep Code Audits
Sol 1710: Left Mastcam-Z Camera, acquired at 10:38:35.499 (local mean solar time), image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASU
December 12, 2025 at 3:01 PM
Sol 1710: Left Mastcam-Z Camera, acquired at 10:38:35.499 (local mean solar time), image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASU
"For man has closed himself up,
till he sees all things through narrow chinks of his cavern."
Materialism really is a mad and tragic religion.
till he sees all things through narrow chinks of his cavern."
Materialism really is a mad and tragic religion.
I'm not offended.
Give me the beauty of nature's complexity. The wind and water cycles coincidentally causing a moment combined with the beauty of the mind that can observe and understand it.
Or your simplistic answer of magic?
Give me the beauty of nature's complexity. The wind and water cycles coincidentally causing a moment combined with the beauty of the mind that can observe and understand it.
Or your simplistic answer of magic?
December 11, 2025 at 11:00 PM
"For man has closed himself up,
till he sees all things through narrow chinks of his cavern."
Materialism really is a mad and tragic religion.
till he sees all things through narrow chinks of his cavern."
Materialism really is a mad and tragic religion.
Reposted by Deep Code Audits
The politics of thermodynamic denial.
A system can take some risk-bearing migrants but not infinite risk. It can absorb high performers but not entire populations with large variance tails.
The Leftist is essentially saying:
“We should optimise policy around extremely rare outliers & ignore tail"
A system can take some risk-bearing migrants but not infinite risk. It can absorb high performers but not entire populations with large variance tails.
The Leftist is essentially saying:
“We should optimise policy around extremely rare outliers & ignore tail"
December 9, 2025 at 5:21 PM
The politics of thermodynamic denial.
A system can take some risk-bearing migrants but not infinite risk. It can absorb high performers but not entire populations with large variance tails.
The Leftist is essentially saying:
“We should optimise policy around extremely rare outliers & ignore tail"
A system can take some risk-bearing migrants but not infinite risk. It can absorb high performers but not entire populations with large variance tails.
The Leftist is essentially saying:
“We should optimise policy around extremely rare outliers & ignore tail"
Reposted by Deep Code Audits
This is a purity ritual. When Otto tells the follower:
“I think it’s a repeat troll.” -hes issuing a liturgical classification.
It’s the digital equivalent of sprinkling holy water and saying “unclean spirit, begone.”
He cant admit:
“I think it’s a repeat troll.” -hes issuing a liturgical classification.
It’s the digital equivalent of sprinkling holy water and saying “unclean spirit, begone.”
He cant admit:
December 9, 2025 at 8:34 PM
This is a purity ritual. When Otto tells the follower:
“I think it’s a repeat troll.” -hes issuing a liturgical classification.
It’s the digital equivalent of sprinkling holy water and saying “unclean spirit, begone.”
He cant admit:
“I think it’s a repeat troll.” -hes issuing a liturgical classification.
It’s the digital equivalent of sprinkling holy water and saying “unclean spirit, begone.”
He cant admit:
To Otto, my reply is entropy.
Entropy = complexity, variance, unpredictable signal.
His system is already metastable: held together by selective attention, morality printing + a shrinking echo chamber.
So when I introduce even a mild counter-signal the system did the obvious thing:
Entropy = complexity, variance, unpredictable signal.
His system is already metastable: held together by selective attention, morality printing + a shrinking echo chamber.
So when I introduce even a mild counter-signal the system did the obvious thing:
The question:
How do we design a sane, safe, balanced immigration policy?
The Leftist replacement:
“Do you want to erase Freddie Mercury?” - an obvious emotional blackmail attempt.
It also ignores that:
The Manchester bomber
The Parsons Green bomber
The 7/7 cell
How do we design a sane, safe, balanced immigration policy?
The Leftist replacement:
“Do you want to erase Freddie Mercury?” - an obvious emotional blackmail attempt.
It also ignores that:
The Manchester bomber
The Parsons Green bomber
The 7/7 cell
December 9, 2025 at 8:28 PM
To Otto, my reply is entropy.
Entropy = complexity, variance, unpredictable signal.
His system is already metastable: held together by selective attention, morality printing + a shrinking echo chamber.
So when I introduce even a mild counter-signal the system did the obvious thing:
Entropy = complexity, variance, unpredictable signal.
His system is already metastable: held together by selective attention, morality printing + a shrinking echo chamber.
So when I introduce even a mild counter-signal the system did the obvious thing:
The question:
How do we design a sane, safe, balanced immigration policy?
The Leftist replacement:
“Do you want to erase Freddie Mercury?” - an obvious emotional blackmail attempt.
It also ignores that:
The Manchester bomber
The Parsons Green bomber
The 7/7 cell
How do we design a sane, safe, balanced immigration policy?
The Leftist replacement:
“Do you want to erase Freddie Mercury?” - an obvious emotional blackmail attempt.
It also ignores that:
The Manchester bomber
The Parsons Green bomber
The 7/7 cell
December 9, 2025 at 5:28 PM
The question:
How do we design a sane, safe, balanced immigration policy?
The Leftist replacement:
“Do you want to erase Freddie Mercury?” - an obvious emotional blackmail attempt.
It also ignores that:
The Manchester bomber
The Parsons Green bomber
The 7/7 cell
How do we design a sane, safe, balanced immigration policy?
The Leftist replacement:
“Do you want to erase Freddie Mercury?” - an obvious emotional blackmail attempt.
It also ignores that:
The Manchester bomber
The Parsons Green bomber
The 7/7 cell
The politics of thermodynamic denial.
A system can take some risk-bearing migrants but not infinite risk. It can absorb high performers but not entire populations with large variance tails.
The Leftist is essentially saying:
“We should optimise policy around extremely rare outliers & ignore tail"
A system can take some risk-bearing migrants but not infinite risk. It can absorb high performers but not entire populations with large variance tails.
The Leftist is essentially saying:
“We should optimise policy around extremely rare outliers & ignore tail"
December 9, 2025 at 5:21 PM
The politics of thermodynamic denial.
A system can take some risk-bearing migrants but not infinite risk. It can absorb high performers but not entire populations with large variance tails.
The Leftist is essentially saying:
“We should optimise policy around extremely rare outliers & ignore tail"
A system can take some risk-bearing migrants but not infinite risk. It can absorb high performers but not entire populations with large variance tails.
The Leftist is essentially saying:
“We should optimise policy around extremely rare outliers & ignore tail"
Very worrying. Criminalising emotional distress from online commentary collapses the shared space of meaning-making.
The Barton case isnt about protecting supposed 'victims'.
It’s about unmaking the public sphere, because the public sphere is no longer under institutional control.
The Barton case isnt about protecting supposed 'victims'.
It’s about unmaking the public sphere, because the public sphere is no longer under institutional control.
December 8, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Very worrying. Criminalising emotional distress from online commentary collapses the shared space of meaning-making.
The Barton case isnt about protecting supposed 'victims'.
It’s about unmaking the public sphere, because the public sphere is no longer under institutional control.
The Barton case isnt about protecting supposed 'victims'.
It’s about unmaking the public sphere, because the public sphere is no longer under institutional control.