Christopher R. Matthews
@drcrmatthews.bsky.social
4.1K followers 3.7K following 360 posts

▪︎ Reading, writing & thinking about the moral foundation of scholarship ▪︎ Author of Doing Good Social Science: http://bit.ly/3EgFA2z ▪︎ More about my work: immersiveresearch.co.uk ▪︎ DM for speaking/workshop requests

History 27%
Sociology 19%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
There is a clear but I think somewhat hidden alignment between Byung-Chul Han and Simome Weil. Ill write that out at some point. But for now, do any philosophy people wanna have a wee chit chat about the idea? And owt else social science philosophy?

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
No so much. If you have a good understanding of social life, for example, you will make quite logical methodological decisions that add up.

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
That seems alarmingly disconnected from existing theory. But id have to study it to know for sure.

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Yep agreed. Some discussion needed about 'interesting', I think. My preference is for important topics as the definition of what that is can try to establish objectively important work rather 'merely' someone's interest

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
All agreed. I just keep running up again poor understanding of social life, hence the focus. Ive just reposted the original so im gonna delete this thread later.

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
The quality of your methods is meaningless if the quality of your theory is lacking. Put another way - if your basic assumptions are wack your methodological rigour is wasted effort. More in Ch8 here: www.routledge.com/Doing-Good-S....

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
The quality of your methods is meaningless if the quality of your theory is lacking. Put another way - if your basic assumptions are wack your methodological rigour is wasted effort.

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Im saying to people we provide bland research philosophy statements, in the large part.

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Your philosophical position is most obvious in how you produce, understand and treat data. One of the less obviously places it comes across is usually in a bland and hackneyed statement of 'Philosophical Position'. Research philosophy is practical and pragmatic more than it is explicable in prose.

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Its honest, that all the really matters to me.

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
What a lovely thing to say, thanks. Not only do I see them show up where you suggest, they show up in my own work! I make that point somewhere in something ive writen on the topic

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Ive been teaching in HE since 2008. Every year at least one ernest undergraduate has told me 'there's no research on [insert topic]'. And, of course, every time they have been dead wrong. I do love a wee academic truism.

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Im a lucky/privileged one in that regard so I will not comment

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Absolutely wholesome interactions between people on what ever level are great to see.

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Oh, nice detail. Im digging it, bit nerdy 🤓

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
Ive started referring to myself as a social scientist. Largely because I use social theory and philosophy from across disciplines to frame the science and scholarship I do and the books i write. It feels cogent and useful to me, but if can certainly be a slippy and abused framing of what some do.

drcrmatthews.bsky.social
DM me if youd like to read the full chapter, cheers 🍻