Eric Clive
@ericclive.bsky.social
420 followers 630 following 450 posts
Retired law professor and law reformer. Pro EU. Anti Brexit. Pro UN, pro international law and civilised international relations. Supporter of Scottish independence in Europe for pro European, internationalist, democratic, progressive and other reasons.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
ericclive.bsky.social
I may do that, Scott. It was excellent. The question of the "audience" in statutory drafting is interesting and important. So glad you're teaching statutory drafting and interpretation in the way you are.
ericclive.bsky.social
Was amused to be given the option of having a toilet seat delivered in a brown paper wrapping rather than the manufacturer's box. Offer declined. Delivery driver thereby subjected to the awful knowledge that this house probably has a toilet.
Seriously though, where does this prudishness come from?
Reposted by Eric Clive
andrew.sharpe.scot
In Scotland we only have the choice of a British media. When it comes to politics its opinion is entirely gauged through the lense of England where its based. Scotland is quite different - as this latest YouGov poll neatly illustrates.

Only independence will address this.

#OnafhankelijkheidNu
Reposted by Eric Clive
indyposterboy.scot
So, Starmer is going to be visiting Scotland more often in the months leading up to GE2026. Maybe the media could get off their arses and ask him these questions.
ericclive.bsky.social
It seems quite possible that the whole America-harming Trumpist agenda will collapse in revulsion before the next UK general election. With it will go the political prospects of its authoritarian imitators in the UK. I cling to this hope.
Reposted by Eric Clive
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
It's a pretty big deal that the NYC Bar Association--one of the most prominent and respected bar associations in the country--is accusing the President of ordering the "unlawful summary execution," i.e. murder--of civilians in violation of US and international law. www.nycbar.org/press-releas...
ericclive.bsky.social
I don't subscribe to a stitch-up theory but I think there is a huge reluctance to admit openly that the FWS case has made some legislation more rather than less necessary. Understandable political caution, with elections coming up, is one thing. A devious lack of openness is another.
ericclive.bsky.social
So we don't know how the judge might have interpreted the weird drafting of reg 15 of the School Premises (Scotland) Regs 1967. That reg must pose a problem for schools. It's astonishing that the Scottish government said virtually nothing about it in its recent guidance on supporting trans pupils.
ericclive.bsky.social
I asked the Scottish Council of Law Reporting whether there were plans to report the case of Hurley v Scottish Borders Council (on gender neutral school toilets). There are not, because "there was no opinion published ... to accompany the decision" and "it doesn't seem to exist elsewhere".
Reposted by Eric Clive
iandunt.bsky.social
It breaks my mind that two British political parties have seen scenes like this and decided to try and replicate it in Britain. Thuggary, lawlessness, state brutality. Farage and Badenoch decided they liked the look of it.
cristianfarias.com
This video of Chicagoans intervening to save a man from being abducted off the streets by ICE is making the rounds on Instagram.

Community action works.

Source: www.instagram.com/reel/DPZL2AL...
ericclive.bsky.social
Predictable stuff from Home Sec on Laura Kuensberg show just now - clamp down further on pro-Palestine protests. Very little, if any, recognition that Israel's atrocities in Gaza ara at the root of the deplorable and horrible rise in anti-semitism.
ericclive.bsky.social
But then they go on to say . "Depending on the particular circumstances of individual pupils, schools may require to take legal advice on any approach or proposed approach, including where this means changing an existing arrangement."
No mention of the need to update the 1967 Regs!
Reposted by Eric Clive
markemuk.bsky.social
This is the road to perdition.
ericclive.bsky.social
Enjoyed the piece, headed "Scots once sought better lives. Now we burn hotels for housing others".

The suggestion that it should be "the some people's party" is a nice one but is maybe really saying that her party has the wrong nickname. I'd go along with that.
ericclive.bsky.social
Some fine oyster mushrooms on a poplar log.
ericclive.bsky.social
True - esp as the new guidance mentions gender neutral facilities with approval. "Education authorities and schools should consider the toilet provision necessary for transgender pupils. This may include the use of gender neutral provision."
ericclive.bsky.social
Written answer 26/6/24.

"The Scottish Government intends to update the
[Regs].

Given the time elapsed between the previous consultation exercise that took place in 2017-18, we must now consider the updated context that the regulations will exist in. We are now taking this work forward."
ericclive.bsky.social
I've been (belatedly) looking at reg 15 of the School Premises (Scotland) Regs 1967. Strange. Half of the toilets are to be for boys. Nothing about the other half. So could gender neutral toilets be taken out of that half? Surely not - too discriminatory against girls. What a mess! Updating needed.
Reposted by Eric Clive
ericclive.bsky.social
Has she any idea of how this otp declaration of undying friendship for a country ruled by a genocidal regime goes down in the country at large?

"https://www.thenational.scot/news/25510910.rachel-reeves-says-will-always-friend-israel/
Rachel Reeves says she will 'always be a friend of Israel'
Rachel Reeves has said she will "always be a friend of Israel".
www.thenational.scot
ericclive.bsky.social
Pheasant In north Edinburgh garden . First time I’ve seen this in over 50 years,
ericclive.bsky.social
Para 32 of the 2017 Consultation suggested "except
where they are provided for use by one pupil at a time. Urinals in these circumstances may no longer be necessary ..." Of course this might now be reconsidered but I hope not.
I cannot see any good objection to single user gender neutral toilets.