Author | Lightnews

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria

@foreskingirlx.bsky.social

33 followers 79 following 140 posts

I've no issues being labeled antisemitic by those who mutilate children's genitals! Post your dick in public - expect public opinions! #Intactivist #BanInfantCircumcision #CircumcisionMyth Status: Married

Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

Pinned

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · May 7

So, X aka #Twitter decided to permanently suspend me for this... I guess I will start to be more active here now...

Is this a warning? Maybe...

6 3 8

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Sep 11

Puny mutilated man:

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Sep 11

Actually, puny mutilated man, this is where you're wrong. Saying "don't cut a baby's genitals" is the exact opposite of pedophilia.

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 15

bsky.app/profile/fore...

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 15

Why circumcise infant boys without medical need?

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 15

Pleasure gain? Glans flaring? Stop hiding behind anecdotes and optics. Cutting healthy, functional tissue from a non-consenting infant is mutilation. Permanent loss of sensation and anatomy isn't debatable, no matter your studies.

"I feel so much more now they removed the most sensitive part."
- R

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 15

@cut-greek.bsky.social You really can't hide it, you're hungry for infant penile mutilation, aren't you? Like a moth to a flame, a predator to its victim, like a mohel… oh, that's so disturbing!

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 15

So your answer: parents can amputate healthy, functional tissue from a non-consenting child for any reason they deem sufficient. That's exactly why every credible medical ethics body in the developed world rejects it.

You still haven't justified why a healthy infant's genitals should be cut at all.

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 15

No. Medically indicated surgery addresses a problem, like removing an inflamed appendix. Non-consensual removal of healthy, functional tissue is mutilation. Same tools, but different intent, necessity, and ethics.

Why do you keep blurring that line?

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 15

Why circumcise infant boys without medical need?

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 15

That's the difference between you and every major medical ethics body in the developed world, they understand that context and consent matter. Removing healthy tissue without consent is mutilation. Treating a genuine medical problem is surgery. Same tools, different ethics.

Stop projecting!

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 15

Doing Oxford now, okay.

If removing the most sensitive, functional part of the penis without consent isn't disfigurement, what is? Anatomical reduction is permanent. Sensory loss is permanent. That's both disfigurement and disability, whether you like the words or not.

How about an answer?

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 15

Interesting. You accuse me of projecting while you're projecting your own hostility onto me.

Still waiting for your answer: Why circumcise infant boys without medical need?

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 14

Predator says what?

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 14

How out of touch are you? Maybe read what I wrote again before replying.

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 13

I'm not misunderstanding or misrepresenting you. Repeating long, evasive posts doesn't clarify anything.

Focus on the topic: circumcision without medical need is mutilation, nothing more.

Question: Why circumcise infant boys?

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 13

If my son ever required circumcision for a true medical reason, I would tell him the truth, that without medical indication, it is mutilation.

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 13

You do not even have CCR5Δ32. As a Nordic woman I am far more likely to carry it, yet I am not arrogant enough to think it excuses recklessness. This is about genital mutilation, and you have yet to defend it without grasping at irrelevant straws.

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 13

91% of #men...

1 3

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 13

You didn't have to say it, you threw it into a circumcision discussion as if it bolstered your point. That's called shifting the goalposts. CCR5Δ32 doesn't make you safe, it makes you complacent, and complacency spreads infections faster than any foreskin ever could.
How out of touch are you?

3 1

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 11

CCR5Δ32 (a rare Northern European, not Greek, genetic mutation) has nothing to do with circumcision (genital mutilation) and doesn't protect from all HIV strains or other STIs.

Reckless "predator" talk just spreads disease.

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 11

How about you answer the question instead of dodging with false equivalences?

If circumcision worked as claimed, why would condoms still be necessary?

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 9

It thinks it's immune to "most HIVs" and calls itself a "selective predator." That's not confidence, that's delusion mixed with creepiness and exactly the mindset that spreads infections.

There are two words for people like that: One starts with R, the other with P.

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 9

You are seriously desperate to justify infant penile mutilation.

Bragging about being a "selective predator" doesn't make you sound smart, it just makes you sound creepy.

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 9

Why are you still trying to claim infant penile mutilation isn't mutilation? Removing healthy, functional tissue from a non-consenting person is exactly that. No study or "African trial" changes the ethics: consent matters, and the right to bodily integrity isn't up for debate.

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 8

The global mainstream rejects infant circumcision: Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Germany, etc. Consent isn't extremist, it's basic ethics.
Deflecting to antivax comparisons just shows you've run out of arguments.

1 1

Jane ❤️ Kev & Maria @foreskingirlx.bsky.social · Aug 8

Ok, let's have a look...
gitnux.org/condom-use-s...

The U.S. has higher condom usage and mass circumcision, yet still has HIV rates 5–6x higher than intact countries like Denmark or Sweden.

Are you using condoms on your dick or just for blowing up?

Condom Use Statistics Statistics: Market Data Report 2025

Our in-depth Market Data Report about Condom Use Statistics. Explore the latest data.

gitnux.org