@gschat.bsky.social
120 followers 170 following 12 posts
Proud Democrat 💙 Author ✍️, philanthropist 💙, hedge fund manager 💹 & founder of @open-society.bsky.social foundations 🌍, justice ⚖️ & global progress 🕊️, inspired by change ✨🔑. ⛔️ Anti-Trump/MAGA 🚫 Only Important DMs be straight to the point
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
gschat.bsky.social
Trying to override a federal order to deploy troops against Americans? That’s not patriotism, that’s the very definition of a wannabe dictator losing control.
gschat.bsky.social
Calling public institutions that, is Trump’s excuse to slash protections, silence oversight, and grab unchecked power.
gschat.bsky.social
Trump’s decline is obvious, but the real danger is Miller running the show. America didn’t elect a fascist aide with a Hitler complex, yet he’s pulling DHS and DOJ strings like a wannabe dictator.
thetnholler.bsky.social
Stephen Miller tells law enforcement in MEMPHIS: “You are unleashed”
gschat.bsky.social
Every time Donald Trump looks at the mirror #dumbtrump
gschat.bsky.social
Trump’s war on free speech shows his true colors, he’ll shred the Constitution if it means silencing those who disagree. Even non-citizens deserve protection from authoritarian overreach #dumbtrump
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
BREAKING: Judge William Young finds that Noem, Rubio, DHS, and State "deliberately" sought to restrict non-citizens' First Amendment rights.

"'No law' means 'no law.' The First Amendment does not draw President Trump’s invidious distinction ...."

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
President Irump here makes clear that, in his view, the First Amendment's
protection of freedom of speech applies to American citizens
alone, and to an unconstitutionally narrow view of citizenship at that.
This case -- perhaps the most important ever to fall within
the jurisdiction of this district court -- squarely presents the
issue whether non-citizens lawfully present here in United
States actually have the same free speech rights as the rest of us. The Court answers this Constitutional question unequivocally "yes, they do." "No law" means "no law." The First Amendment does not draw President Trump's invidious
distinction and it is not to be found in our history ....
gschat.bsky.social
Do what ever you want, we have copies, history lives forever #dumbtrump
gschat.bsky.social
❌cancel everything 🚫MAGA⛔️ #DUMBTRUMP
gschat.bsky.social
Removing images of slavery’s brutality is an attack on memory itself. Trump wants to whitewash America’s past so he can justify repeating its worst crimes. #dumbtrump