Jens Peter Andersen
@ipoga.bsky.social
1.3K followers 210 following 29 posts
Senior researcher: bibliometrics, policy impact, scientific elites & quant studies of gender in research at Aarhus University. #bibliometrics #scientometrics #scisci #metascience
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
ipoga.bsky.social
Is anyone else getting a peculiar email about retracting articles from "Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences"?
ipoga.bsky.social
- There are a lot of myths and anecdotal knowledge out there - we need to talk more about what we want to use GenAI for; including why, how, and when.
ipoga.bsky.social
- What this is, varies by field, and especially how you produce new knowledge. What is fine in one field may not be in another - guidelines and policies need to reflect or accomodate this.
ipoga.bsky.social
- Researchers have a pretty good idea about what they consider good and bad research practice, and tools like GenAI are used in accordance with recommendations about good, ethical practice.
ipoga.bsky.social
We identified three main perceptions of the role of GenAI in research, and a number of recommendations for writing policies about GenAI for academic research. Some of the most important takeaways here are:
ipoga.bsky.social
My colleagues and I have been sharing blogs and news about a survey we did on how researchers use generative AI - that study is now published and openly available here:

doi.org/10.1016/j.te...
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
ipoga.bsky.social
Added context, since polls can only be very short:
It seems like a somewhat standard practice now, that editors create reviewer accounts without consent or contact, as a service, so the potential reviewer doesn't have to do it themself. It used to be the opposite. #peerreview #reviewer2
ipoga.bsky.social
Journal editors create reviewer accounts automatically, with username and password, without prior consent. What are your thoughts on this?

1️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/1" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400" target="_blank" rel="noopener">It's a great service, it saves me some hassle.
2️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/2" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400" target="_blank" rel="noopener">I don't really care.
3️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/3" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400" target="_blank" rel="noopener">It feels icky and predatory.

📊 Show results
ipoga.bsky.social
Journal editors create reviewer accounts automatically, with username and password, without prior consent. What are your thoughts on this?

1️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/1" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400" target="_blank" rel="noopener">It's a great service, it saves me some hassle.
2️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/2" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400" target="_blank" rel="noopener">I don't really care.
3️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/3" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400" target="_blank" rel="noopener">It feels icky and predatory.

📊 Show results
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
thierryrossier.bsky.social
New paper out with @benzpierre.bsky.social @kristofferkropp.bsky.social and Trine Cosmus Nobel in a special issue on Mapping relational structures in culture
kristofferkropp.bsky.social
Two new publications that encapsulate my interests to present my self. Both are focusing on science in Europe and the processes shaping science and especially social science in Europe. In the first one we analyze scientific disciplines using ERC projects and topic analysis.
doi.org/10.1016/j.po...
Homologies in fields of cultural production. Evidence from the European scientific field
This article suggests a comparative field analytical approach to fields of cultural production. Combining concepts from field analysis and focusing on…
www.sciencedirect.com
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
ipoga.bsky.social
Full transparency: the open call is open to all applicants, and there are no guarantees for a job offer. I am offering to co-develop an application that addresses disruption in science, with plenty of room for personalising it.
Granted applications are fully funded three-year projects.
ipoga.bsky.social
What is disruption in science?

I am looking for a prospective PhD student to study disruption theoretically, qualitatively and quantitatively at Aarhus University.

If you are interested in developing your own project under our open call, in collaboration with me, please get in touch.
a woman says you are being disruptive
ALT: a woman says you are being disruptive
media.tenor.com
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
floriannaudet.bsky.social
Updated -largely no exhaustive- list : go.bsky.app/R8RNJgc
Please reply to be added.
ipoga.bsky.social
Hi Florian, great list, I’d love to be added
ipoga.bsky.social
With all the new influx of users, I’d love to see a community around #sciencepolicy #scipol #bibliometrics #scientometrics #scisci #metascience. Please share if you want to be part of it, use the tags to find others, or just say hi 👋
ipoga.bsky.social
Current deadline is February 1st, so perhaps only relevant for those that already have a project description and want to expand where they apply :) for the fall deadline, feel free to get in touch for further information
ipoga.bsky.social
Interested in writing a PhD in the broad area of “research on research” (responsible research, research integrity, bibliometrics, scientometrics, science funding, research policy, etc.)? We (@cfa_res_pol) have fully funded positions every 6 months: bss.au.dk/en/research/...
Application
bss.au.dk
ipoga.bsky.social
The dot in question:
ipoga.bsky.social
The Christian implications of God creating mankind and our Earth, without a mention of other worlds or life in the vastness of the Universe is historically meaningful, but to me, philosophically sorrowful. And as Carl Sagan (in Pale Blue Dot) goes on to argue, grounds for much chauvinism.
Photo of text reading: “Ann Druyan suggests an experiment: Look back again at the pale blue dot of the preceding chapter. Take a good long look at it. Stare at the dot for any length of time and then try to convince yourself that God created the whole Universe for one of the 10 million or so species of life that inhabit that speck of dust. Now take it a step further: Imagine that everything was made just for a single shade of that species, or gender, or ethnic or religious subdivision. If this doesn't strike you as unlikely, pick another dot. Imagine it to be inhabited by”
ipoga.bsky.social
😂
eikofried.bsky.social
Alice laughed. 'Cohen's D=4.08? There's no use trying—one can't believe impossible things.'

I daresay you haven't had much practice,' said the Queen. 'When I was your age, I always did it for 30min a day. Sometimes I reviewed as many as six papers with impossible effect sizes before breakfast."
ipoga.bsky.social
This was the tipping point for me - account created on pubpeer and comment submitted.