Jack Kessler
@jackkessler.bsky.social
8.3K followers 1.9K following 2.3K posts
I write the newsletter, Lines To Take, bringing you one big story of the day, every day. Sign up for free: https://www.linestotake.com/ I like human rights and French cuisine.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jackkessler.bsky.social
What it's like to go horribly, horribly viral.

That time I incurred the wrath of a continent (and the Daily Mail).

My new newsletter, Lines To Take, out now.
What it's like to go horribly, horribly viral
I incurred the wrath of a continent (and the Daily Mail)
www.linestotake.com
Reposted by Jack Kessler
jackkessler.bsky.social
The Trappings of Opposition.

Kemi Badenoch likes the freedom of opposition (tax cuts! easy answers!) — but is less keen on doing the heavy analytical lifting.

✍️ www.linestotake.com/p/kemi-baden...

My newsletter, out now.
For many years, the conventional wisdom in Westminster dictated that veteran Labour MP Harriet Harman was a “humourless feminist”. There was more than a whiff of misogyny about this. Not least when Harman — no doubt with the help of her adviser and sometime stand-up comedian Ayesha (now Baroness) Hazarika — was more than capable of landing a decent punchline.

My favourite came during the 2010 Queen’s Speech when, as acting deputy leader, Harman took aim squarely at the Liberal Democrats. The party, thrust into government for the first time in decades and led by future Mark Zuckerberg bag-carrier Nick Clegg, had requested that it hold on to “Short money”. That is, funding to support opposition parties in carrying out their parliamentary duties. Harman remarked:

Some say that the Liberal Democrats like to be all things to all people. But even they can’t be both in government and in opposition. They can’t fudge this one. They are in government — they can’t claim Short money. We’re all familiar with the notion of clinging on to the trappings of power. But the Liberal Democrats are surely the first party to attempt to cling onto the trappings of opposition.
jackkessler.bsky.social
Isn't it also as basic as something like the odds for England winning a world cup are shorter in England than other markets because people bet patriotically. What use is that as a signal of probabilities?
Reposted by Jack Kessler
timbale.bsky.social
One reason Tories lost in 2024 was the awful state of the NHS. They badly need to fess up & say how they plan not to f*ck it up next time.

All we got yesterday:

"In the NHS, industrial action has kept waiting lists high for far too long. Enough is enough. We will ban doctors from going on strike."
jackkessler.bsky.social
The time-lapse watercolour of Walden is a bit BBC Saturday morning TV kids show but the music is so rich.
jackkessler.bsky.social
The Dennis Taylor-esque glasses don't help anyone but it is striking how much older Thatcher looks only a year later.
Margaret Thatcher: “No, No, No!” Speech (1990)
YouTube video by Omer Gendler
www.youtube.com
jackkessler.bsky.social
First time I've sat down and watched this from start to finish and I wish my main reflection wasn't that the word "unassailable" no longer confers any meaning.
Margaret Thatcher - The Walden Interview 29/10/1989
YouTube video by Thomas Gatehouse
youtu.be
Reposted by Jack Kessler
janelytv.bsky.social
“There will be no more mercy.”

“No one deserves pity. Spare me your whining.”

Those are captions to videos of Russian drone operators attacking civilians in Kherson city and region.

Living in Kherson means risking execution from the sky.

www.wsj.com/world/russia... (read free)
Russian Drones Turn the Streets of Kherson Into a Civilian Kill Zone
The attacks on Kherson are part of Russia’s growing strategy to terrorize civilians in an effort to sap Ukrainians’ strength to resist in the fourth year of war.
www.wsj.com
Reposted by Jack Kessler
duncanrobinson.bsky.social
Law is politics by other means. Wrote about Leigh Day, the law firm that love suing the government www.economist.com/britain/2025...
Reposted by Jack Kessler
nickmiller79.bsky.social
England & Wales will be led out tonight not by the usual kids as mascots, but by 22 people living with dementia & Alzheimer's.

This is the story of three of them. They talked about what it means to them & the brilliant work the @alzheimerssoc.bsky.social do.

www.nytimes.com/athletic/669...
'We need to do something' – Why England vs Wales will feature 22 adult mascots living with dementia
www.nytimes.com
jackkessler.bsky.social
How much of the latter is a purely James Ball effect?
jackkessler.bsky.social
My dog is similarly adamant we never give her treats.
Reposted by Jack Kessler
jackkessler.bsky.social
You're saying we should aim to get drunk in fewer hours?
Reposted by Jack Kessler
gilesyb.bsky.social
UK food industry blames govt for rising grocery bills - on.ft.com/43df9V1

Fascinating all round. Factors include:

Bad Brexit effects
NICs rise pass through
Higher NMW
Skills shortage exacerbated by post Brexit effects
Weather
Producer responsibility regs
Subsidies don't incentivize growing 1/
UK food industry blames government for rising grocery bills
Living wage increases, new regulations and backed-up planning system driving price rises, say producers
on.ft.com
Reposted by Jack Kessler
jackkessler.bsky.social
It reminds me of a terrific scene in The Sopranos, where Tony and Carmella are trying to work out how to punish their daughter:

Carmela: There has to be consequences

Tony: And there will be, I hear you ok? Let’s just not “overplay” our “hand” because if she finds out we’re powerless, we’re fucked
The Sopranos (1999–2007) Toodle-Fucking-Oo: Tony and Carmela talk about Meadow's punishment
YouTube video by Alfred C. Chu
www.youtube.com
jackkessler.bsky.social
In opposition, saying is all you can do. But you shouldn't telegraph to people that you're not doing the thinking!
jackkessler.bsky.social
Obviously, being in opposition means you get to do things like spend a bankers' bonuses tax 15 different ways or not take a position on nuclear power.
Tony Blair DESTROYS the Tories on Nuclear Power
YouTube video by New Labour
www.youtube.com
jackkessler.bsky.social
What will you replace it with? A particularly strange omission when Badenoch is trying to reposition the Conservatives as the party of fiscal responsibility.
jackkessler.bsky.social
“The next Conservative government will abolish stamp duty on your home” is not a complete sentence. It’s like someone saying “My boss, in a chicken costume” before drifting off. Or overhearing half a phone call and only catching “… because I thought it was cheese.”
jackkessler.bsky.social
The main benefit of being in opposition is time. But there's no guarantee that will be spent well.

Labour lost in 2015 and promptly made Jeremy Corbyn its leader. In 2001, the Tories endured a second successive landslide defeat and opted for Iain Duncan Smith over Ken Clarke.
jackkessler.bsky.social
The Trappings of Opposition.

Kemi Badenoch likes the freedom of opposition (tax cuts! easy answers!) — but is less keen on doing the heavy analytical lifting.

✍️ www.linestotake.com/p/kemi-baden...

My newsletter, out now.
For many years, the conventional wisdom in Westminster dictated that veteran Labour MP Harriet Harman was a “humourless feminist”. There was more than a whiff of misogyny about this. Not least when Harman — no doubt with the help of her adviser and sometime stand-up comedian Ayesha (now Baroness) Hazarika — was more than capable of landing a decent punchline.

My favourite came during the 2010 Queen’s Speech when, as acting deputy leader, Harman took aim squarely at the Liberal Democrats. The party, thrust into government for the first time in decades and led by future Mark Zuckerberg bag-carrier Nick Clegg, had requested that it hold on to “Short money”. That is, funding to support opposition parties in carrying out their parliamentary duties. Harman remarked:

Some say that the Liberal Democrats like to be all things to all people. But even they can’t be both in government and in opposition. They can’t fudge this one. They are in government — they can’t claim Short money. We’re all familiar with the notion of clinging on to the trappings of power. But the Liberal Democrats are surely the first party to attempt to cling onto the trappings of opposition.
Reposted by Jack Kessler
jackkessler.bsky.social
There will be midterm elections in America. The Democrats might even win them. But it may not matter under competitive authoritarianism.

✍️ www.linestotake.com/p/donald-tru...

My newsletter, Lines To Take, out now.
Observing from afar the relentless attacks on the US constitution and actual Americans by the Trump administration, it’s tempting to declare something grand and final, like “there won’t be midterm elections next year” or “this is a fascist state”. Not because we know those things to be true, but because the alternative — waiting and wondering — feels worse.

The United States under Trump — and practically any Republican president at this point — is what academics call a “hybrid regime” or “competitive authoritarianism”. This ought not take too much imagination because these systems exist all over the world, including Turkey, Mexico and Tunisia. Even in autocracies such as Russia and Iran, there are elections. It’s just that they are neither free nor fair.

The 2026 midterms will not only go ahead, the Democrats could win them. Trump and the GOP are unpopular. The economy is slowing. Tariffs are hurting. Many (though not all) voters liked the idea of Trump 2.0 more than the reality. But the point about hybrid regimes is that, even if the opposition manages to scrape over the line in legislative elections, it may not matter all that much. A determined and unshackled executive could simply ignore or overrule the other branches of government.
jackkessler.bsky.social
"You can’t just point at things and abolish the tax on them without an economically efficient replacement!"
Myleene Klass and Ed Miliband