https://jamesmzd.github.io/
How does peer reviewer diversity affect fairness in peer review and the direction of published science? We find a "geographical representation bias" in 60 STEM journals published by @ioppublishing.bsky.social.
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Say #NoContractNoCoffee with us: DON'T BUY STARBUCKS for the duration of our open-ended ULP strike! $SBUX
Say #NoContractNoCoffee with us: DON'T BUY STARBUCKS for the duration of our open-ended ULP strike! $SBUX
I glanced down at the message.
“Anna, Lindsey Halligan here,” it began.
So began my text exchange with the woman who is prosecuting the president's perceived political enemies.
www.lawfaremedia.org/article/anna...
I glanced down at the message.
“Anna, Lindsey Halligan here,” it began.
So began my text exchange with the woman who is prosecuting the president's perceived political enemies.
www.lawfaremedia.org/article/anna...
@lseimpactblog.bsky.social
@lseimpactblog.bsky.social
#Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment
#Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment
400+ years of strategic dynamics in the game of Go (Baduk/Weiqi), from feudalism to AlphaGo!
400+ years of strategic dynamics in the game of Go (Baduk/Weiqi), from feudalism to AlphaGo!
✍️ @jamesmzd.bsky.social & Misha Teplitskiy
#PeerReview #PeerReviewWeek #PRW25 #AcademicSky
✍️ @jamesmzd.bsky.social & Misha Teplitskiy
#PeerReview #PeerReviewWeek #PRW25 #AcademicSky
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n
The first of three talks will be by Vincent Yuan, with 'Researcher Adherence to Journal Data Sharing Policies: A Meta-Research Study'
VY: Science runs on trust - but we need evidence.
#PRC10
The first of three talks will be by Vincent Yuan, with 'Researcher Adherence to Journal Data Sharing Policies: A Meta-Research Study'
VY: Science runs on trust - but we need evidence.
#PRC10
“We advocate for *robust reflexivity,* a practice that critically reflects on reflexivity itself.”
By @catherinetrundle.bsky.social and colleagues
Open Access: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
“We advocate for *robust reflexivity,* a practice that critically reflects on reflexivity itself.”
By @catherinetrundle.bsky.social and colleagues
Open Access: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
#genai #llms #cogsci #chess
https://tomstafford.substack.com/p/superhuman-intelligence-already-exists
#genai #llms #cogsci #chess
https://tomstafford.substack.com/p/superhuman-intelligence-already-exists
#econsky #polisky #socsky
How does peer reviewer diversity affect fairness in peer review and the direction of published science? We find a "geographical representation bias" in 60 STEM journals published by @ioppublishing.bsky.social.
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
#econsky #polisky #socsky
How does peer reviewer diversity affect fairness in peer review and the direction of published science? We find a "geographical representation bias" in 60 STEM journals published by @ioppublishing.bsky.social.
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
How does peer reviewer diversity affect fairness in peer review and the direction of published science? We find a "geographical representation bias" in 60 STEM journals published by @ioppublishing.bsky.social.
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
spkl.io/63328A1crC
@innovation.bsky.social @jamesmzd.bsky.social
spkl.io/63328A1crC
@innovation.bsky.social @jamesmzd.bsky.social
Catch in online July 17, 3:30pm at www.youtube.com/nbervideos
Catch in online July 17, 3:30pm at www.youtube.com/nbervideos
Scientists collectively spend tens of millions of hours peer reviewing each year, mostly for no $$. Why??
In new work w/ Charles Ayoubi and @innovation.bsky.social, we observe a private benefit for participating in evaluation: 💡💡Learning💡💡
Scientists collectively spend tens of millions of hours peer reviewing each year, mostly for no $$. Why??
In new work w/ Charles Ayoubi and @innovation.bsky.social, we observe a private benefit for participating in evaluation: 💡💡Learning💡💡