JaxEsq
banner
jaxesq.bsky.social
JaxEsq
@jaxesq.bsky.social
1.1K followers 880 following 1.2K posts
Attorney at Garlic Bread (not your attorney). Attractive Nuisance ⚖️ formerly lawtwitter. Movies, horror, Disney, puns, 90s McDonald’s toys, Swiftie since 07, general Nerd Extraordinaire™️ https://www.instagram.com/jax.esq/profilecard/?igsh=MWQ1ZGUxMzBkMA==
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Guess I should make my bio make sense again as I am now, as I was on the That Other Hellscape, an attorney at garlic bread.
And weird facts probably about weird birds.
LOVE LOVE LOVE this movie. Scared me to death (heh) when it first came out.
Being an in-house attorney can be best illustrated by this meme
The Hunt is SO GOOD
The potions table 😭😭😭
You KNOW I love when Disney hits the public domain 😂😂😂😂
Oh hi. Been a minute on here. What did I miss?
It’s been quite a day, so cheers from happy hour
Squad goals
Big time fan and supporter of TeamUSA
🫣
This account just posts food at British football stadiums and it's the most upsetting shit I've ever seen
Happy Monday from me and my emotional support pile of unread books
I think it’s hearing someone else read them that’s bugging me.
I both do and don’t wanna know with the “weed whacker” thing.
The Office episode “Scott’s Tots” was the cringiest thing I’ve sat through watching… until I heard the texts between Karen Read and Brian Higgins.
a woman in a black dress says awkward in front of a grammy trophy
ALT: a woman in a black dress says awkward in front of a grammy trophy
media.tenor.com
Perhaps they should about the prehistoric lizards.
I missed it!! Wow. I’m honestly surprised. Very surprised.
About to see this and it’s like one of the last days to see this in theaters around here apparently - solo date it is 😊
No worries! I’m curious to see where the ARRCA testimony goes.
Okay so we are actually on the same page about ARRCA because I do also believe there were significant discovery issues there. But you just said the backstory is more important - my comment was about a personal experience and his behavior. So no, his style was the entire point of my original post.
You also say Hank Brennan is enforcing a tenet of our constitutional rights in his tone of questioning and you mention Article 14 and collusion. Constitutional rights are there largely to protect the accused. What rights are you specifically speaking about? Because you personally aren’t impacted.
And again I’m going to ask you, someone who has posted about disliking the likes of Trump on your own feed and Trump certainly does like to name call: what are you hoping to accomplish by name calling just like those you claim to be against?
I’m genuinely asking this - how am I minimizing the situation? Because I was reminded of this kind of personality that I didn’t like when I was doing litigation myself? He was making snide comments and was admonished by the Court several times for it. It was ethically poor attorney behavior.