US president demands that Kyiv accepts plan that would mean giving up territory to Russia

What's Changed Add support for zed-comment by @marcoroth in #203 chore(deps): update pnpm to v10.20.0 by @renovate[bot] in #201 Add zed-comment support for all ERB languages by @marcoroth in #205 ...

This video course teaches you how to use Phlex to build high quality Rails frontends that you can use with existing Erb apps or go all-in and build from the ground up with components. Phlex brings san...

A Git-compatible VCS that is both simple and powerful - jj-vcs/jj

Web framework emphasis on sync web controllers vs async background jobs leads to incohesive workflows.

Optimal DOM morphing, written in TypeScript. Contribute to yippee-fun/morphlex development by creating an account on GitHub.

On September 9, without warning, Ruby Central kicked out the maintainers who have cared for Bundler and RubyGems for over a decade. Ruby Central made these changes against the established project poli...

Web development for the rest of us

YouTube video by reinteractive

YouTube video by Joel Drapper

Apple engaged in anticompetitive behavior by charging App Store developers "excessive and unfair prices" for app distribution services, the UK's Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruled today [PDF] (via Reuters). The Tribunal found that Apple abused its market power by overcharging developers from October 2015 through the end of 2020. Developers were forced into using Apple's in-app purchase system and had no alternative to paying up to a 30 percent commission during that time period. The excessive fees ultimately led to higher prices for consumers. According to the CAT, Apple had a monopoly over iOS app distribution and in-app payments. Apple's argument that Android and other platforms were viable alternatives for consumers and developers was rejected. The Tribunal also did not accept Apple's argument that its rules and fees were required for user security and privacy. The end of 2020 in the UK's timeline corresponds with the launch of the App Store Small Business Program that saw Apple reduce ‌App Store‌ fees for independent developers and small business owners. The program reduced the commission that Apple collected from developers earning under $1 million per year to 15 percent, down from 30 percent. It's also when Apple began implementing other ‌App Store‌ changes in response to cases like Epic Games v. Apple. The class action lawsuit was first filed in 2021 by Kings College London academic Dr. Rachael Kent, and the claim seeks up to £1.5 billion in damages. The period between 2015 and 2020 was selected in order to determine how much Apple will need to pay to UK consumers. A damages trial is scheduled for November. Apple said it will appeal the ruling.Tags: App Store, United Kingdom This article, "Apple Loses UK Antitrust Lawsuit Over App Store Fees, Faces £1.5 Billion in Damages" first appeared on MacRumors.com Discuss this article in our forums

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

YouTube video by Joel Drapper

Select Topic Area Product Feedback Body Summary We are requesting that GitHub implement a mandatory multi-person approval system for top-level organization ownership changes consistent with their a...