BLACK FRIDAY SALES ➜ https://store.lennartnacke.com/
Join here (bookmark): www.youtube.com/live/vpj2FT...
See you tomorrow.
PhD students who schedule 90 minutes every Tuesday and Thursday?
They defend on time.
Snack writing isn't about motivation.
It's about making writing as mandatory as your seminar.
Book it. Protect it. Show up.
PhD students who schedule 90 minutes every Tuesday and Thursday?
They defend on time.
Snack writing isn't about motivation.
It's about making writing as mandatory as your seminar.
Book it. Protect it. Show up.
Why?
Methods are validated.
Reviewers understand the context.
You're building, not defending novelty.
If your lab needs 3 papers this year, at least 2 should be extensions.
Gaps are sexy.
Extensions are systematic.
Why?
Methods are validated.
Reviewers understand the context.
You're building, not defending novelty.
If your lab needs 3 papers this year, at least 2 should be extensions.
Gaps are sexy.
Extensions are systematic.
1. Writing block: 8-10 AM, no meetings
2. Weekly pipeline review: what's submitted, what's stuck
3. Monthly system audit: what's working, what's broken
Output follows structure.
Structure follows routine.
1. Writing block: 8-10 AM, no meetings
2. Weekly pipeline review: what's submitted, what's stuck
3. Monthly system audit: what's working, what's broken
Output follows structure.
Structure follows routine.
1. Map the terrain
2. Build bridges to existing work
3. Shift your lens
4. Weigh the evidence
5. Commit to your stance
Do this, and panels will notice.
1. Map the terrain
2. Build bridges to existing work
3. Shift your lens
4. Weigh the evidence
5. Commit to your stance
Do this, and panels will notice.
1. Filling a gap in the literature
2. Extending existing findings
3. Correcting flawed previous research
If you can't clearly state which one, reviewers will reject you.
Finding your niche isn't a choice.
It's essential for making it.
1. Filling a gap in the literature
2. Extending existing findings
3. Correcting flawed previous research
If you can't clearly state which one, reviewers will reject you.
Finding your niche isn't a choice.
It's essential for making it.
Papers will follow.
Conference talks will follow.
Patents will follow.
But if you force publication before exploration is complete, you get rushed work in garbage journals.
Papers will follow.
Conference talks will follow.
Patents will follow.
But if you force publication before exploration is complete, you get rushed work in garbage journals.
The reviewers already told you how to fix everything.
No guessing.
No mystery.
Just follow the roadmap they gave you.
Treat it like a conditional acceptance.
Because that's exactly what it is.
The reviewers already told you how to fix everything.
No guessing.
No mystery.
Just follow the roadmap they gave you.
Treat it like a conditional acceptance.
Because that's exactly what it is.
PhD students who use a synthesis matrix?
They write lit reviews in weeks.
The literature crosswalk isn't fancy.
It's a spreadsheet where themes meet papers.
Rows are concepts. Columns are sources.
Cells are substance.
PhD students who use a synthesis matrix?
They write lit reviews in weeks.
The literature crosswalk isn't fancy.
It's a spreadsheet where themes meet papers.
Rows are concepts. Columns are sources.
Cells are substance.
We know everything about someone's research.
We know nothing about their life.
The student working two jobs.
The technician months away from loved ones.
The postdoc navigating a family crisis.
You see them every day.
Ask how they're actually doing.
We know everything about someone's research.
We know nothing about their life.
The student working two jobs.
The technician months away from loved ones.
The postdoc navigating a family crisis.
You see them every day.
Ask how they're actually doing.
• Sabbatical leave
• Weekend marathons
• 8-hour writing binges
What actually makes me productive:
• 30-minute daily sessions
• Consistent location
• Stopping mid-sentence
Everyone chases the 1st list, but it usually ends in burnout.
• Sabbatical leave
• Weekend marathons
• 8-hour writing binges
What actually makes me productive:
• 30-minute daily sessions
• Consistent location
• Stopping mid-sentence
Everyone chases the 1st list, but it usually ends in burnout.
1. Wrong journal fit
2. Weak research question
3. Methods lack rigour
4. Contribution is unclear
5. Writing is unreadable
Fix these before you submit.
Revision won't save structural problems.
1. Wrong journal fit
2. Weak research question
3. Methods lack rigour
4. Contribution is unclear
5. Writing is unreadable
Fix these before you submit.
Revision won't save structural problems.
Nobody mentions the failed experiments you absorbed.
The student who quit and left a gap in your team.
The project pivot that cost six months of progress.
The nights you stayed late to fix someone else's mistake.
Your metrics shine.
Nobody mentions the failed experiments you absorbed.
The student who quit and left a gap in your team.
The project pivot that cost six months of progress.
The nights you stayed late to fix someone else's mistake.
Your metrics shine.
You enter thinking you'll master a field.
You leave knowing how to:
• Keep working despite chronic uncertainty
• Recover from devastating feedback
• Rebuild when your approach fails
• Defend your ideas under fire
You enter thinking you'll master a field.
You leave knowing how to:
• Keep working despite chronic uncertainty
• Recover from devastating feedback
• Rebuild when your approach fails
• Defend your ideas under fire
Gaps: High risk, high reward funding (R01, ERC)
Extensions: Incremental funding (pilot grants, industry)
Corrections: Good luck getting funded
Your entry point determines your funding strategy.
Gaps: High risk, high reward funding (R01, ERC)
Extensions: Incremental funding (pilot grants, industry)
Corrections: Good luck getting funded
Your entry point determines your funding strategy.
1. Reviewers read abstracts, skim intros, scrutinize methods
2. Clear figures buy you goodwill
3. Defensive writing signals weak arguments
Write for busy skeptics.
Because that's who's reading.
1. Reviewers read abstracts, skim intros, scrutinize methods
2. Clear figures buy you goodwill
3. Defensive writing signals weak arguments
Write for busy skeptics.
Because that's who's reading.
Not because you're smarter.
Because 90-minute sessions let you revise before submitting.
Snack writing = time to catch your own mistakes.
Big blocks create rushed submissions.
Short sessions create polished papers.
Not because you're smarter.
Because 90-minute sessions let you revise before submitting.
Snack writing = time to catch your own mistakes.
Big blocks create rushed submissions.
Short sessions create polished papers.
1. Faster first drafts
2. Clearer argument structure
3. Better lit review synthesis
4. Stronger grant narratives
5. More time for deep thinking
But verify every claim.
AI gets details wrong.
1. Faster first drafts
2. Clearer argument structure
3. Better lit review synthesis
4. Stronger grant narratives
5. More time for deep thinking
But verify every claim.
AI gets details wrong.
Getting rejected from a fully funded offer doesn't mean you weren't good enough.
It means 23 or more other candidates applied for the same spot.
And one of them had exactly what that specific PI needed for their next grant.
Getting rejected from a fully funded offer doesn't mean you weren't good enough.
It means 23 or more other candidates applied for the same spot.
And one of them had exactly what that specific PI needed for their next grant.
Track your lab's data:
Gap papers: How many months?
Extension papers: How many months?
Correction papers: How many months?
Your past timelines predict future capacity.
Plan accordingly.
Track your lab's data:
Gap papers: How many months?
Extension papers: How many months?
Correction papers: How many months?
Your past timelines predict future capacity.
Plan accordingly.
They think they need 4-hour stretches to make progress.
So they wait for breaks. Wait for sabbatical. Wait for summer.
Meanwhile, their drafts collect dust and their ideas go stale.
Here's what actually works:
They think they need 4-hour stretches to make progress.
So they wait for breaks. Wait for sabbatical. Wait for summer.
Meanwhile, their drafts collect dust and their ideas go stale.
Here's what actually works:
In the abstract, you explain why you abandoned it.
That journal would teach us more about research reality than any impact factor ever could.
Because knowing when to quit is as important as knowing what to pursue.
Maybe more important.
In the abstract, you explain why you abandoned it.
That journal would teach us more about research reality than any impact factor ever could.
Because knowing when to quit is as important as knowing what to pursue.
Maybe more important.
Not the prerequisite.
When you reverse this, students optimize for the wrong thing.
They chase journals that accept fast.
Not journals that matter.
And predatory publishers feast.
Not the prerequisite.
When you reverse this, students optimize for the wrong thing.
They chase journals that accept fast.
Not journals that matter.
And predatory publishers feast.
1. Vague questions kill timelines
2. Isolation kills motivation
3. Perfectionism kills output
4. Systems save everyone
Most PhD problems aren't intellectual.
They're structural.
1. Vague questions kill timelines
2. Isolation kills motivation
3. Perfectionism kills output
4. Systems save everyone
Most PhD problems aren't intellectual.
They're structural.
Three types matter:
1. Gap filling: Nobody studied this
2. Extension: Build on solid work
3. Correction: Fix flawed conclusions
Most PhD students waste 8 months because they never chose one.
Three types matter:
1. Gap filling: Nobody studied this
2. Extension: Build on solid work
3. Correction: Fix flawed conclusions
Most PhD students waste 8 months because they never chose one.
It removes the friction of starting them.
I use it to:
• Draft rough outlines
• Summarize 20 papers in minutes
• Rewrite clunky sentences
The activation energy drops to zero.
Suddenly I'm editing, not staring at blank pages.
It removes the friction of starting them.
I use it to:
• Draft rough outlines
• Summarize 20 papers in minutes
• Rewrite clunky sentences
The activation energy drops to zero.
Suddenly I'm editing, not staring at blank pages.