Lennart Nacke, PhD
@lennartnacke.com
🧠 Tenured brain, fresh daily takes. Maximum citations but sanity questionable. The prof your prof follows for daily research & AI takes. Quality wins. University Research Chair & Tenured Full Professor.
BLACK FRIDAY SALES ➜ https://store.lennartnacke.com/
BLACK FRIDAY SALES ➜ https://store.lennartnacke.com/
Most academics design their writing schedules backwards.
They wait for the perfect day. Clear calendar. Empty inbox. Sharp mind.
That day never comes.
Here's how to build a system that works without perfect conditions:
x.com/acagamic/st...
They wait for the perfect day. Clear calendar. Empty inbox. Sharp mind.
That day never comes.
Here's how to build a system that works without perfect conditions:
x.com/acagamic/st...
January 15, 2026 at 1:12 PM
Most academics design their writing schedules backwards.
They wait for the perfect day. Clear calendar. Empty inbox. Sharp mind.
That day never comes.
Here's how to build a system that works without perfect conditions:
x.com/acagamic/st...
They wait for the perfect day. Clear calendar. Empty inbox. Sharp mind.
That day never comes.
Here's how to build a system that works without perfect conditions:
x.com/acagamic/st...
Your sacrifice stays hidden.
January 15, 2026 at 6:02 AM
Your sacrifice stays hidden.
These skills matter more than your thesis topic ever will.
January 15, 2026 at 12:58 AM
These skills matter more than your thesis topic ever will.
Subscribe for frameworks that help you navigate the system: go.lennartnacke.com/newsletter
Research Freedom. Run a smarter research lab in 7 minutes a week.
Get one short email each week on how to turn your lab, clinic, or research team into a publishing and funding machine – using simple systems, ethical AI workflows, and better delegation.
go.lennartnacke.com
January 14, 2026 at 12:58 AM
Subscribe for frameworks that help you navigate the system: go.lennartnacke.com/newsletter
If you got rejected, apply again next cycle.
Different PI, different timing, different grant phase.
The PhD you don't get might save you from 5 years of misalignment.
Reply with 👍 if rejection redirected you to a better fit.
I write about academic survival tactics every week.
Different PI, different timing, different grant phase.
The PhD you don't get might save you from 5 years of misalignment.
Reply with 👍 if rejection redirected you to a better fit.
I write about academic survival tactics every week.
January 14, 2026 at 12:58 AM
If you got rejected, apply again next cycle.
Different PI, different timing, different grant phase.
The PhD you don't get might save you from 5 years of misalignment.
Reply with 👍 if rejection redirected you to a better fit.
I write about academic survival tactics every week.
Different PI, different timing, different grant phase.
The PhD you don't get might save you from 5 years of misalignment.
Reply with 👍 if rejection redirected you to a better fit.
I write about academic survival tactics every week.
That's all.
It never was about your potential.
It never was about your potential.
January 14, 2026 at 12:58 AM
That's all.
It never was about your potential.
It never was about your potential.
What separates accepted from rejected:
1. Alignment with active research projects
2. Demonstration of relevant methods experience
3. Clear articulation of why THIS lab
4. Evidence of ability to finish
Notice what's missing?
Your worth as a researcher.
Rejection measures fit.
1. Alignment with active research projects
2. Demonstration of relevant methods experience
3. Clear articulation of why THIS lab
4. Evidence of ability to finish
Notice what's missing?
Your worth as a researcher.
Rejection measures fit.
January 14, 2026 at 12:58 AM
What separates accepted from rejected:
1. Alignment with active research projects
2. Demonstration of relevant methods experience
3. Clear articulation of why THIS lab
4. Evidence of ability to finish
Notice what's missing?
Your worth as a researcher.
Rejection measures fit.
1. Alignment with active research projects
2. Demonstration of relevant methods experience
3. Clear articulation of why THIS lab
4. Evidence of ability to finish
Notice what's missing?
Your worth as a researcher.
Rejection measures fit.
I've rejected applicants with perfect scores because their interests didn't match my lab's trajectory.
Not because they couldn't do the work.
Because I couldn't supervise them properly while delivering on existing commitments.
That's the brutal economics of PhD admissions.
Sorry.
Not because they couldn't do the work.
Because I couldn't supervise them properly while delivering on existing commitments.
That's the brutal economics of PhD admissions.
Sorry.
January 14, 2026 at 12:58 AM
I've rejected applicants with perfect scores because their interests didn't match my lab's trajectory.
Not because they couldn't do the work.
Because I couldn't supervise them properly while delivering on existing commitments.
That's the brutal economics of PhD admissions.
Sorry.
Not because they couldn't do the work.
Because I couldn't supervise them properly while delivering on existing commitments.
That's the brutal economics of PhD admissions.
Sorry.