Innovator, climate research & communication, social entrepreneur.
Board member Club of Rome NL
This isn't rocket science, but we do need more of these NASA satellites. 🌍🛰
To keep us from going blind.
bsky.app/profile/leon...
The climate is at the whim of ignorant plutocrats
The climate is at the whim of ignorant plutocrats
acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/...
#aerosols #climatechange #clouds #IMO2020 #ECS
acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/...
#aerosols #climatechange #clouds #IMO2020 #ECS
@hausfath.bsky.social and @climateofgavin.bsky.social didn't include the Hansen et al. observation based forcing (+0.5 W/m²) and global warming (0.2°C) estimate of shipping aerosols in their WMO report, without argumentation.
1/
@hausfath.bsky.social and @climateofgavin.bsky.social didn't include the Hansen et al. observation based forcing (+0.5 W/m²) and global warming (0.2°C) estimate of shipping aerosols in their WMO report, without argumentation.
1/
#ClimateCrisis #ClimateAction
@bikingmzstacey.bsky.social @radsci.bsky.social
youtube.com/live/xn4Zr2E...
#ClimateCrisis #ClimateAction
@bikingmzstacey.bsky.social @radsci.bsky.social
youtube.com/live/xn4Zr2E...
"We want to ensure transparency, inclusivity, predictability and legitimacy.
Does everyone agree with this approach?"
Saudi Arabia:
"Hell no, we need you to confirm that our backroom huddle meetings remain, so we can halt progress without anyone noticing"
(Somewhat paraphrasing)
"We want to ensure transparency, inclusivity, predictability and legitimacy.
Does everyone agree with this approach?"
Saudi Arabia:
"Hell no, we need you to confirm that our backroom huddle meetings remain, so we can halt progress without anyone noticing"
(Somewhat paraphrasing)
0.11 W/m² added to the 4-year average Net-flux increase over the North Pacific.
Absorbed Solar Radiation is almost 5W/m² higher than at the start of the century.
All added greenhouse gases since 1750 cause a 4.1 W/m² forcing
0.11 W/m² added to the 4-year average Net-flux increase over the North Pacific.
Absorbed Solar Radiation is almost 5W/m² higher than at the start of the century.
All added greenhouse gases since 1750 cause a 4.1 W/m² forcing
Turns out it's very rare phenomena called "anticrepuscular rays" or "God rays" 😍🌤
Turns out it's very rare phenomena called "anticrepuscular rays" or "God rays" 😍🌤
'Although there are oceans we must cross
And mountains that we must climb
I know every gain must have a loss,
So pray that our loss is nothing but time'
Leonardo DiCaprio recited this at the end.
'Although there are oceans we must cross
And mountains that we must climb
I know every gain must have a loss,
So pray that our loss is nothing but time'
Leonardo DiCaprio recited this at the end.
Also available on Substack: jimehansen.substack.com/p/warning-th...
Also available on Substack: jimehansen.substack.com/p/warning-th...
In parallel to experiments run by complex climate models, we evaluate the simple climate models that are used as translations of knowledge from physical science to scenario projections
In parallel to experiments run by complex climate models, we evaluate the simple climate models that are used as translations of knowledge from physical science to scenario projections
Investigations are still ongoing, but I can't help to think of the billion people in Africa still depending on biomass for cooking their food and all the fires and indoor air pollution deaths it causes.
Investigations are still ongoing, but I can't help to think of the billion people in Africa still depending on biomass for cooking their food and all the fires and indoor air pollution deaths it causes.
Global sea level rise is also a crucial indicator of Earth's Energy Imbalance.
It takes about 50 times as much heat to increase sea levels by thermal expension of the oceans than it does from melting ice.
Satellites paint a very worrying picture!
Global sea level rise is also a crucial indicator of Earth's Energy Imbalance.
It takes about 50 times as much heat to increase sea levels by thermal expension of the oceans than it does from melting ice.
Satellites paint a very worrying picture!
The AMOC plays a crucial role in transporting the carbon to the deep ocean.
Weakening of the AMOC could reduce the ocean CO₂ sink by as much as 100 billion tons this century.
The AMOC plays a crucial role in transporting the carbon to the deep ocean.
Weakening of the AMOC could reduce the ocean CO₂ sink by as much as 100 billion tons this century.
robbieandrew.github.io/GCB2025/
robbieandrew.github.io/GCB2025/
Global Sea Ice Area Maximum never peaked lower than it did this year...
Less sea ice leads to less sunlight reflection back to space, more (high latitude) heat uptake and even faster ice melt.
Global Sea Ice Area Maximum never peaked lower than it did this year...
Less sea ice leads to less sunlight reflection back to space, more (high latitude) heat uptake and even faster ice melt.
The opposite is happening and that's a Big F*cking Deal (BFD) to use @drjamesehansen.bsky.social his phrasing.
1/
The opposite is happening and that's a Big F*cking Deal (BFD) to use @drjamesehansen.bsky.social his phrasing.
1/
And the acceleration of warming over the Northern Hemisphere is painfully obvious:
And the acceleration of warming over the Northern Hemisphere is painfully obvious:
The Framework Convention (UN, 1992) and Paris Agreement (2015) define goals relative to "prein-dustrial" temperature, but do not define that period. We use 1880-1920, the earliest time with near-global coverage of instrumental data'
esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/5...
The Framework Convention (UN, 1992) and Paris Agreement (2015) define goals relative to "prein-dustrial" temperature, but do not define that period. We use 1880-1920, the earliest time with near-global coverage of instrumental data'
esd.copernicus.org/articles/8/5...
243 days in a row with maximum temperatures above 10°C
www.weeronline.nl/nieuws/15-11...
243 days in a row with maximum temperatures above 10°C
www.weeronline.nl/nieuws/15-11...
Using a 1880-1920 pre-industrial reference baseline (as preferred by @drjamesehansen.bsky.social et al.), 2025 will be close to +1.5°C.
That's with the tropical Pacific causing some relative cooling (La Niña)!
Using a 1880-1920 pre-industrial reference baseline (as preferred by @drjamesehansen.bsky.social et al.), 2025 will be close to +1.5°C.
That's with the tropical Pacific causing some relative cooling (La Niña)!
"pursuing inadequate methane emission reductions causes remaining carbon budgets compatible with the Paris Agreement temperature limits [plural!] to be exhausted *today* [feb 2024], effectively putting achievement of the Paris Agreement out of reach.'
www.nature.com/articles/s43...
"pursuing inadequate methane emission reductions causes remaining carbon budgets compatible with the Paris Agreement temperature limits [plural!] to be exhausted *today* [feb 2024], effectively putting achievement of the Paris Agreement out of reach.'
www.nature.com/articles/s43...