Opinions my own
With current technology, it is impossible to tell whether survey respondents are real or bots. Among other things, makes it easy for bad actors to manipulate outcomes. No good news here for the future of online-based survey research
Signed, someone who practices open science
Clinical science is science.
Clinical science is science.
(Holy Cow! Reminds me also of how Bullshit Receptivity items can glom together!)
(Holy Cow! Reminds me also of how Bullshit Receptivity items can glom together!)
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
So not just formatting. But finding evidence to support your argument after you’ve made it and without you reading the cited source.
When you give ChatGPT resumes, it's biased in how it evaluates minorities.
When you ask ChatGPT to generate resumes for women & minorities, it generates systematically different types of resumes
When you give ChatGPT resumes, it's biased in how it evaluates minorities.
When you ask ChatGPT to generate resumes for women & minorities, it generates systematically different types of resumes
Please see our website for more info about what we do + share with applicants you think might be a good fit.
share.google/uJRyS3NY9Kdo...
Please see our website for more info about what we do + share with applicants you think might be a good fit.
share.google/uJRyS3NY9Kdo...
Towards Next-Generation Stress Generation Research: Expert Consensus Methodological Guidelines
With a legit superstar team
Here’s how it could transform research on stress generation (& beyond) 🧵
Towards Next-Generation Stress Generation Research: Expert Consensus Methodological Guidelines
With a legit superstar team
Here’s how it could transform research on stress generation (& beyond) 🧵