Luke Thorburn
@lukethorburn.com
1.4K followers 400 following 74 posts
Algorithms ∩ Conflict • PhD candidate • King's College London • lukethorburn.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Luke Thorburn
justinhendrix.bsky.social
Macron remarks are notable- some quotes: "We have been incredibly naive in entrusting our democratic space to social networks that are controlled either by large American entrepreneurs or large Chinese companies, whose interests are not at all the survival or proper functioning of our democracies."
defenddemocracy.bsky.social
President Macron: “Europeans, let's wake up!

We have been incredibly naive in entrusting our democratic space to social networks.”

defenddemocracy.eu/macron-democ...
Reposted by Luke Thorburn
pettertornberg.com
🚨 PhD Position at the University of Amsterdam 🚨

Join my team as a computer scientist / computational social scientist working on LLMs, social media, and politics.

We offer freedom, impact, and an inspiring environment at one of Europe's leading universities.

🔗 werkenbij.uva.nl/en/vacancies...
Vacancy — PhD Position on Improving Social Media Using Large Language Models
The Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC) at the University of Amsterdam is inviting applications for a fully funded PhD position in the NWO VIDI project "Improving Social Media Using L...
werkenbij.uva.nl
Reposted by Luke Thorburn
pettertornberg.com
In the literature, there are two competing explanations for "echo chambers":
1️⃣ Algorithms curate what we see (“filter bubbles”)
2️⃣ People choose like-minded peers (“selective exposure”)

Our new study suggests something surprising:

both explanations might be wrong. 🧵

arxiv.org/abs/2508.10466
Online Homogeneity Can Emerge Without Filtering Algorithms or Homophily Preferences
Ideologically homogeneous online environments - often described as "echo chambers" or "filter bubbles" - are widely seen as drivers of polarization, radicalization, and misinformation. A central debat...
arxiv.org
Reposted by Luke Thorburn
xuanalogue.bsky.social
Ever since I started thinking seriously about AI value alignment in 2016-7, I've been frustrated by the inadequacy of utility+RL theory to account for the richness of human values.

Glad to be part of a larger team now moving beyond those thin theories towards thicker ones.
lukethorburn.com
The whole conference looks great this year too! Talks from Cory Doctorow, Kate Starbird, + Glen Weyl; a workshop on futarchy w. Robin Hanson (straight after ours); and lots of papers on using AI to scaffold human coordination and collective decision-making.

ci.acm.org/2025/
lukethorburn.com
🔔

Often our tech policy interventions operate from linear, top-down assumptions that don't account for the complexity they seek to govern.

To dig into this I'm co-organizing a workshop at ACM CI 2025 with Jason Burton, Joe Bak-Coleman, + Naomi Shiffman. You should come!

ci-x-tp.github.io
lukethorburn.com
Proposals for Build Peace (arguably the main conference on digital peacebuilding) are now open. This year it's near Barcelona in November. Consider applying!

https://howtobuildpeace.org/attend-the-conference/register/
Reposted by Luke Thorburn
knightgtown.bsky.social
🚨 WEBINAR ALERT 🚨 Join KGI on March 25th for a live discussion on designing algorithmic feeds that put people first. As legislation and litigation around algorithms heats up, it’s never been more important to learn how they can be improved.
Reposted by Luke Thorburn
knightcolumbia.org
EVENT: Join us for Artificial Intelligence and Democratic Freedoms on April 10-11 at
@columbiauniversity.bsky.social & online. Hosted with Senior AI Advisor @sethlazar.org. Co-sponsored by the Knight Institute & @columbiaseas.bsky.social. Panel info in 🧵. RSVP: knightcolumbia.org/events/artif...
Artificial Intelligence and Democratic Freedoms
knightcolumbia.org
lukethorburn.com
Connected by Data are seeking examples of participatory digital governance to map out such projects around the world.

https://connectedbydata.org/blog/2025/03/05/participatory-digital-governance
lukethorburn.com
This was very much a joint effort with Andrew Konya, Wasim Almasri, Oded Adomi Leshem, Ariel Procaccia, Lisa Schirch, Michiel Bakker @mbakker.bsky.social, and many others.

Looking forward to seeing these kinds of technologies mature!
lukethorburn.com
This level of agreement is particularly noteworthy because, at the beginning of the process, the substrate of trust that makes dialogue (and Track II diplomacy) possible among peacebuilders in the region had (understandably) grown fragile.
lukethorburn.com
The process resulted in a joint letter to the international community with a set of five demands, each of which has at least 90% of support from participants on each 'side'.
lukethorburn.com
In April – July 2024, in collaboration with the Alliance for Middle-East Peace (ALLMEP), we conducted a series of online collective dialogues with civil society peacebuilders in Israel and Palestine, and used LLMs and bridging-based ranking to surface ideas that had broad support across groups.
lukethorburn.com
🔔 (new paper!)

You might have heard of the "Habermas Machine", an AI-human pipeline that is really good at finding common ground between ideologically diverse groups, at least in lab settings.

But can this kind of approach help in real world conflicts?
A diagram of the process used in the paper that this thread announces. The effort consisted of four dialogue cycles with peacebuilders: three uninational dialogues cycles conducted respectively with
Israeli Jews, Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza, and Palestinian citizens of Israel, followed by a final joint dialogue involving
all three groups. Each dialogue cycle involved a process to find common ground among participants followed by a deliberation on the
results of that process. The common ground process started with a collective dialogue, then bridging-based ranking was used to
identify common ground ’bridging statements’ that were distilled into articulate ’collective statements’ via LLM and reviewed by
human experts before being shared back with participants for a final vote.
lukethorburn.com
This is joint work with @jonathanstray.bsky.social (Berkeley), @juliehawke.bsky.social (Build Up), and Emillie de Keulenaar (UN).
lukethorburn.com
Live near Chicago? Or going to ISA 2025? Want to geek out on conflict theory + coauthor a landmark paper?

We're finding all the ways people distinguish between "good conflict" and "bad conflict" — but we need help, so we're hosting a workshop! You should come!

https://forms.gle/BKxziu8zbZ1oZZqU8
Reposted by Luke Thorburn
rreisman.bsky.social
Re-aligning SOCIAL MEDIA & AI: "Whom does it serve? That is the overarching issue as we confront "enshittification" & threats to democracy. Subject of 4 publications covered in this thread. 🧵
Most recent applies to PERSONAL AI AGENTS - "Have your AI call my AI"
www.techpolicy.press/new-perspect...
New Perspectives on AI Agentiality and Democracy: "Whom Does It Serve?" | TechPolicy.Press
Richard Reisman and Richard Whitt write that interoperability will enable agential relationships that serve individuals and communities faithfully.
www.techpolicy.press
Reposted by Luke Thorburn
lukethorburn.com
Build Up are hiring a Digital Peacebuilding Associate! You should apply. They're the best.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WH9-zE7tt7EsFe-W_DFAhX3MGuhloiSSAhf0c_y4G_w/edit?usp=sharing
Reposted by Luke Thorburn
mathver.bsky.social
Today the European Commission proposed how Art.40 of the Digital Services Act (#DSA) could work in practice.In a worldwide first, this article in the DSA mandated very large platforms to grant researchers access to a wide range of previously undisclosed data.Some key points - now also on Bluesky :)👇
Reposted by Luke Thorburn
rreisman.bsky.social
Reframing the issues of governing social media.
Human discourse is a social process that depends on three pillars: agency, mediation, & reputation. Without these three strong pillars, + middleware enabling open innovation and interoperation, social media will struggle to balance chaos and control.
techpolicypress.bsky.social
Human discourse is a social process, writes @rreisman.bsky.social , that depends on three pillars: agency, mediation, and reputation. But without strong pillars and middleware enabling open innovation and interoperation, social media will likely struggle to balance chaos and control.
Three Pillars of Human Discourse (and How Social Media Middleware Can Support All Three) | TechPolicy.Press
Human discourse is a social process, writes Richard Reisman, that depends on three pillars: agency, mediation, and reputation.
www.techpolicy.press