Max-Emil King
@maxemilking.bsky.social
400 followers 520 following 20 posts
Researcher at the Ragnar Frisch Centre for Economic Research. www.frisch.uio.no www.maxemilking.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
maxemilking.bsky.social
Late working hours are often seen as a barrier to gender equity in politics and beyond🧱.

My findings need not imply that family-friendly scheduling is bad policy, but if early meetings backfire for working-class politicians, that trade-off needs to be part of the conversation. 9/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
Early sessions, however, increase absences among politicians with inflexible private-sector day jobs by 6 percentage points (~27% relative to their mean).

These jobs are typically in the low-skilled/service sector. 8/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
Results: Neither women in general (Panel A), nor women with children (Panel B), are more likely to attend meetings held at family-friendly hours.

I discuss possible reasons for this null result in the paper.🤔7/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
Importantly, this timing variation is conditionally balanced with respect to the topics discussed (black circles in the figure), suggesting it is unrelated to individual preferences for attending. 6/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
I exploit within-council variation in session timing – such as in Sør-Aurdal municipality – to assess who is less likely to be absent when meetings are held early (~11am 🌞) vs. late (~5pm 🌙). 5/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
Norway provides a compelling setting: recent years have seen growing debate over council meeting times, especially calls for more daytime sessions. 4/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
I study a 25% random sample of Norwegian municipalities, hand-coding individual-level attendance for all 2,620 politicians across 3,334 local council meetings (2015–2019).

Attendance is generally high, but each session sees 10–15% absence due to illness, childcare, urgent work, etc. 3/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
Instead, holding meetings at earlier, more family-friendly times reduces participation among politicians with inflexible, often low-skilled day jobs⚠️.

This challenges the idea that scheduling reforms are a silver bullet for inclusion. 2/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
Do family-friendly hours make it easier for women politicians to participate in meetings? 🕚

In a new working paper, I find they don’t. 🧵1/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
Late working hours are often seen as a barrier to gender equity in politics and beyond.🕔

My findings need not imply that family-friendly scheduling is bad policy, but if early meetings backfire for working-class politicians, that trade-off needs to be part of the conversation. 9/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
Instead, politicians with inflexible private-sector day jobs are negatively affected by early meetings: their absence increases by 6 percentage points (~27% relative to their mean).

These jobs are typically in the low-skilled/service sector. 8/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
Results: Neither women in general (Panel A), nor women with children (Panel B), are more likely to attend meetings held at family-friendly hours.

I discuss possible reasons for this null result in the paper. 7/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
Importantly, this variation is conditionally balanced with respect to the topics discussed in the meetings (see black circles in the figure), suggesting it is unrelated to individual preferences for attending. 6/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
I exploit within-council variation in session timing – such as in Sør-Aurdal municipality – to assess who are less likely to be absent when meetings are held early (~11am 🌞) vs. late (~5pm 🌙). 5/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
Norway provides a compelling setting: in recent years, local media have featured growing debate around council meeting times, especially calls for more daytime sessions. 4/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
I study a 25% random sample of Norwegian municipalities, hand-coding individual-level attendance for all 2,620 politicians across 3,334 local council meetings (2015 – 2019).

Attendance is generally high, but each session sees 10–15% absence due to illness, childcare, urgent work, or similar. 3/10
maxemilking.bsky.social
Instead, holding meetings at earlier, more family-friendly hours reduces participation among politicians with inflexible daytime commitments.

This challenges the idea that scheduling reforms are a silver bullet for inclusion. 2/10
Reposted by Max-Emil King
Reposted by Max-Emil King
teele.bsky.social
My NSF was officially terminated “Beyond the Myth: Political Geography, Electoral Institutions, and the Evolution of Women’s Voting Patterns in Rich Democracies”

I’ve been collecting historical data on the gender turnout and preference gaps after suffrage using old ass books…