Michael Briscoe
@michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
140 followers 310 following 41 posts
Assistant Professor of Sociology at Colorado State University Pueblo. My research looks at intersections of human, animal, and environmental well-being. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Briscoe-3 Posts here reflect my own opinions.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
So 50% say they know it improves health and 65% said they would try it if they had evidence it improved health? Something isn't squaring there.
Reposted by Michael Briscoe
zoei.bsky.social
Michael Briscoe shares fascinating data on large language models and animal issues - how does AI feel about going vegan? surprisingly positive! #IAVS2025
Reposted by Michael Briscoe
zoei.bsky.social
And we’re off! Our 6th annual vegan sociology conference starts today, still time to join us for a fab suite of vegan sociologies of emotions and the senses #IAVS2025
Reposted by Michael Briscoe
contexts.org
New! From @michaelbriscoe.bsky.social, a response to Eppard and Mackey's @contexts.org piece on liberal bias in academia: "A Closer Look at Ideology *and* Truth on Campus"

contexts.org/blog/a-closer-look

#sociology #highereducation #liberalbias
A screenshot of the homepage of Contexts.org shows a new blog post titled "A Closer Look at Ideology *and* Truth on Campus: A Response to Eppard and Mackey." The image shows a lecturer in a campus lecture hall. A screenshot from contexts.org shows the quote "Reflecting widely held ideologies back to the public would no doubt raise trust in academia, but this is not our mandate."
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
What does this mean? Broader structural forces move the CIWB but presidential party does matter. Democrats do a bit better than Republicans at reducing CIWB but both parties need to do more to lower carbon emissions while improving human well-being.
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
The results of autoregressive distributed lag models from 1960-2023 show that shifts from a Republican to a Democrat president are associated with a 1% reduction in CIWB one year later, but I did not find evidence of long-run effects based on political party.
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
Critical perspectives argue that Democrats and Republicans are similar in upholding the status quo, neither making significant moves when it comes to the environment or human well-being. Others argue there are significant differences in how each party affects the environment and human well-being.
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
The CIWB is a ratio of carbon emissions to life expectancy - a measure of environmental stress needed to produce human well-being.

A lower CIWB is therefore a desirable outcome in terms of sustainability.
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
And the schools are only hiring specific kinds of music teachers. Piano specialty? Already got one of those. We're looking for someone who can play and teach violin.
Reposted by Michael Briscoe
asanews.bsky.social
ASA’s TRAILS is a peer-reviewed digital teaching resources library that’s free to ASA members. Check out the Crime and Criminology Resource Collection, featuring syllabi for courses on green criminology, sociology of murder, mass shootings, and more. https://bit.ly/40TkJee
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
Felt inspired by your post and made an interactive graphic on Tableau Public showing cost of doing business and quality of life and the trend line.

public.tableau.com/views/CNBC20...
public.tableau.com
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
I write about these bad faith animal welfare arguments against renewable energy in chapter 4 of my new book. Fossil fuel production kills many more animals both directly and indirectly than renewables. At the same time, we can do more to reduce the impact of renewable energy production on animals.
davidho.bsky.social
There’s no evidence that offshore wind kills whales. But you know what does kill whales? Commercial fishing kills at least 300,000 whales and dolphins every year.
Fact-checking Donald Trump's claim that wind turbines kill whales
The former president blamed wind farms for a spike in whale deaths - but his claims don't stand up.
www.bbc.com
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
It is tempting to visit animal "wildlife centers" or "sanctuaries" that offer you the chance to get close to animals. The problem is many of these organizations are actually roadside zoos more concerned with profit than animal welfare.

Read more in my new piece for @speciesunite.bsky.social
Roadside zoos are animal welfare disasters — Species Unite
Roadside zoos are a welfare nightmare for animals. They are typically small zoos where wild animals are confined in small cages and frequently forced to interact with visitors in stressful and unnatur...
www.speciesunite.com
Reposted by Michael Briscoe
deseret.com.web.brid.gy
Opinion: Gutting humanities signals the end of innovation in business and STEM
As a college professor, watching the dismantling of America’s education system has been among the most discouraging events of my life. American aspirations to be a leader in the world of business and science — which springs from our country’s support only of STEM fields — portend their own loss as things like humanities classes are being threatened with extinction. The things that provide powerful support for the structural modes of thought that promote ideas and innovation are being swept away. And make no mistake, humanities is as important to innovation as science. As an exercise with my Honors students, I ask them to imagine that a group of space aliens arrive and tell them they can have science or humanities but not both (or they will destroy both). Which would they keep? Most people think about the things that have made their lives healthier or allowed them to enjoy the marvels of modern engineering or computation. Interestingly, humanities came first in human history. It was from the humanities that science was developed. The arts were here long before science and are what made science possible. They are the very ground of business and STEM fields. You can make science out of the humanities, but the reverse is unlikely. It’s because we had to have the imagination to build, the capacity to envision new worlds, before we could create something as innovative as science — especially as it was developed in the 17th century. To imagine, dream, think critically and use our minds’ eyes to conceive of futures differently than we were handed are necessary for conjuring new worlds. I often surprise my students when I tell them there is more truth in fiction than in science. I’m being a little tongue-in-cheek, but I do believe it. Science cannot teach us values. They are derived from insights that we learn to understand from the great art, music and literature of the past. The exercise of the imagination is one of the most crucial skills for bringing novelty, invention and new ideas into the world. Reading great literature and listening to world music, poetry, art and other humanities have been vital to my life. The arts humankind has produced have taught me much about how to live more fully and think more critically, caringly and empathically. These skills taught me to think more deeply about the things I taught as a scientist and mathematician. Yes, I teach STEM subjects. My education includes a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science and Statistics from Brigham Young University, a master’s degree in biostatistics from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a Ph.D. in biomathematics. I teach and do research in the biology department at BYU. But without my humanities leanings and studies, I would not have been a very good scientist. My humanities classes were a master class in creativity, envisioning new futures and how to think. It was the skills we learned in our humanities classes that bring creativity to all our endeavors. It is foolish to think that we can make progress in any field without the depth of imagination provided by our humanities classes. Yet that is the supposition that is spreading across our nation like a plague. And it is wrong. Literature classes are essential for science. Music for business. Art for engineering. Poetry for values. If you want STEM-only thinking for our businesses and sciences, then get ready to hire AI algorithms or robots. They can handle that aspect quite well. However, as of yet, only humans can think imaginatively. We can dream. We can recognize and embrace values. The world you see unfolding in this destruction of the humanities is nothing less than abandoning innovation, creativity and a better future. Lose the humanities, and you lose the very ground of science and business that depend on it. Destroy those, and you lose the creative future for which we all hope. Opinion: Let’s be thoughtful in our approach to higher education in Utah
www.deseret.com
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
This sale is on just about everything including my new book, Stocks or Stakeholders. Use code DGBSUMMER25

brill.com/display/titl...

@dgb-philosophy.bsky.social
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
This is a work in progress as I continue to learn Tableau and the most effective ways to communicate this concept.
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
But the adjusted CIWB measure is perhaps easier to understand and use to set goals - something I discuss with my coauthors in our recent paper in Environmental Sociology (linked).

This visualization helps provide the tools to set those goals and see how countries have progressed since 1970.
www.tandfonline.com
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
The visualizations include unadjusted and adjusted measures of the carbon intensity of well-being. Adjusted measures are typically used in environmental sociological analyses because they help account for the different scales of carbon emissions and life expectancy.
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
This interactive visualization includes maps and line graphs of the carbon intensity of well-being for almost every country on earth from the years 1970-2023 (you can use the drop down menu to select countries, and sliders to view years on maps).

The data come from the World Bank.
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
I think the carbon intensity of well-being is one of the most useful sustainability measures. What's more important than reducing environmental impact and improving human well-being?

Being able to explore and interact with this measure helps people understand it. I've made a dashboard to do so -
public.tableau.com
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
This suggests the importance of moving beyond merely criminalizing bird hunting. In this region of Iran, at least, fostering social norms against illegal hunting is an important step to address this problem.
michaelbriscoe.bsky.social
We found that informal deterrence (e.g. disappointing family) had a similar, and even slightly stronger, association with illegal hunting behavior than even formal deterrence (e.g. laws against hunting).