You've been a class act through the whole thing and this post just continues that. I appreciated your advocacy for using OpenCollective, I thought that was a great contribution 👍
That's not a fair characterization. That section of the privacy policy is very specific that the information cannot contain PII, and it's very clearly there to support the awesome work of rubygems.org/pages/data
The only thing holding me back from buying a 57" Samsung Odyssey 2x4K ultrawide is the lack of ultrawide-QOL features in Aerospace. Ultrawides seem cool but you'll have to tear my tiling window manager from my cold, dead fingers.
Ruby community: Look, we can be angry about what's happening, we can raise our complaints, but under no circumstances should anyone _ever_ harass someone's families, coworkers, or friends.
That is completely unacceptable, and wholly against the ethos of the language. We must do better.
good question, obviously better answered by someone Japanese. my impression is the latter. Japan generally has stronger business institutions and associations than the west, so this isn't unique to Ruby.
Ruby's structure and culture is generally not aligned with discussions like github.com/rubygems/rfc.... If the community wants more clarity in governance, process weight, etc, is that the best place to do it?
I had three people from Brazil on a call recently because they wanted to start contributing to Puma but were unsure of where to start. This is something I've done for years and I've always loved it. We sometimes get really important new contributors from these convos.
