Ashley Farley
@openaccessmaven.bsky.social
450 followers 360 following 140 posts
Open Access Advocate & Librarian - Senior Officer of Knowledge & Research Services at the Gates Foundation- Opinions & endorsements are my own
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Ashley Farley
sparcopen.bsky.social
We just posted an impact story on policies at HHMI, Gates & Astera promoting #OpenAccess #OpenScience #OpenData. Powerful signals to other funders to accelerate discovery in science. Well done @madubs.bsky.social @openaccessmaven.bsky.social @pracheeac.bsky.social! sparcopen.org/impact-story...
Funders Roll Out Next Gen Open Policies - SPARC
sparcopen.org
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Your research has the power to drive global health forward.
That’s why eligible Gates Foundation Global Health grantees can access manuscript editing and publishing support from @Editage at no cost.
More details - www.editage.com/funders/gate...
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Thrilled to be giving a lightning talk at the AdaMarie Career Navigation Summit! ⚡My session, "Turn Your Network into Your Superpower", covers both practical ways to build & leverage your community to grow your career. @weareadamarie.bsky.social
Register now!
weareadamarie.com/career-navig...
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Join the OpenCon Librarian Community Call tomorrow! Note that it's an hour later than usual. We will be joined by Creative Commons for an overview of CC Signals. If you work in libraries and AI is a topic that keeps popping up be sure to register!

www.opencon.community/september_20...
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
🌍💡 How can we fund science that’s open, equitable, and aligned with national goals?

Join us at #ScienceSummitNYC to explore how Open Research can drive progress on the #SDGs & how to finance it sustainably.

📅 Register: event.sciencesummitnyc.org/list-of-sess...

#OpenScience #SSUNGA80 #OpenAccess
SCIENCE SUMMIT NEW YORK CITY | 2025
Join global science and innovation leaders at the Science Summit 2025 in New York City. Submit your session, connect with peers, and contribute to sustainable development goals through science.
event.sciencesummitnyc.org
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Now this is a stellar line up and topic for #OpenAccessWeek2025 #OAweek2025!

I love the theme “We Are Enough: Practical Open Access for Everyone" and cannot wait to hear the panelists perspective on it.
psu.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Open%2...
Open Access Week 2025 at the Penn State University Libraries - Penn State MediaSpace
psu.mediaspace.kaltura.com
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Nothing makes me lose hope more in humanity than trying to log into Editorial Manager for the simplest of tasks.
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Watch this video to learn about the importance of openly licensing your research with #CreativeCommons to increase your impact, expand access to knowledge, & strengthen the collective power of the scientific community. www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IBT...
Open Licensing for Research with Creative Commons
YouTube video by Creative Commons
www.youtube.com
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
And by heated convos I am referring to the fact that when we launched Gates Open Research almost a decade ago researchers thought that preprinting and open peer review was wild. Now perceptions have really shifted. Authors that embraced a new model have made it much easier for others to follow
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Time through peer review may be something to look into. With the F1000 model you have to find peer reviewers who agree to be named & the peer review report to be published. F1000 doesn't seem to struggle any more than other publishers to find peer reviewers as far as I know but something to consider
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Now for the MDPI of it all - I think there is a couple things at play here:
1. MPDI aggressive marketing & supplements
2. Speed - while F1000 is fast in some respects if you are getting to an index article MDPI may be faster
3. Maybe easier time through peer review
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Readership and discoverability are still an issue. It's something we've been slowly working on over the years. It's hard when there is so much noise. Authors of course want their papers read & trusted known venues will provide that. I do wish there was more creativity in solutions for this issue.
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Great piece! I think there are a lot of interesting things to unpack here. In my general experience with Gates Open Research authors are reluctant to any change - even if positive. If they think their colleagues expect them to publish in X,Y,Z they will continue to do so.
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Agreed. F1000 & Gates - we made the trek around to grantee groups that would listen. There were heated conversations. I do think it was fundamental to uptake. I'd still like to see much more use but the two limiting factors have been - lack of impact factor & indexing limitations.
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
⏰New account alert to follow!⏰

Follow @orfg.bsky.social for updates on the Open Research Funders Group.
bsky.app/profile/orfg...
bsky.app
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Sadly this is spot on.
It's hard to have empathy though as researcher disinterest in trying to change the system has stymied progress.
saggiotipo.bsky.social
OA advocates need to be prepared for many researchers to become soured on OA due to the OSTP Memo requirements.

Many researchers are gonna be in a tough spot and further linking OA with potential punishments is problematic
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
“For too long, we’ve seen the consolidation of scholarly publishing into the hands of a few major commercial players whose priorities are increasingly divorced from the academic communities they were meant to serve.” www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-o...
Northern universities urge publishers to reform their model - Research Professional News
N8 group calls for change as universities eye subscription cuts and deals are renegotiated
www.researchprofessionalnews.com
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
👏👏👏
seemaychou.bsky.social
We did something radical that shouldn’t feel radical: we stopped funding science built for journals so that we can reimagine scientific publishing. First @arcadiascience.com. Now at @asterainstitute.bsky.social.
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
Excited to see bold action from @asterainstitute.bsky.social in rethinking scientific publishing. The journal model isn’t working — it’s time for systems that reflect how science actually happens.💥 Enough is enough: asterainstitute.substack.com/p/scientific...
#OpenScience #ReimagineResearch
Scientific Publishing: Enough is Enough
Why we're no longer funding journal publications
asterainstitute.substack.com
openaccessmaven.bsky.social
I haven't seen any chatter about Sci-Net yet. Has anyone used it? Is this a SciHub replacement?

I think it's fascinating that at one point SciHub as highly used. What are people doing now? Is open access filling the gap? sci-net.xyz
Sci-Net
sci-net.xyz