Map the free monoid F(C) over Cantor space C onto the additive non-negative reals, so that the right-shift map of F(C) represents halving.
Knowledge of the kernel of a quotient map is NOT one stop shopping.
Map the free monoid F(C) over Cantor space C onto the additive non-negative reals, so that the right-shift map of F(C) represents halving.
Knowledge of the kernel of a quotient map is NOT one stop shopping.
Useful as a sanity check but generally hopeless as one stop shopping for understanding.
Exploring, developing tactics, finding examples and counterexamples, is not replaceable by AI.
Useful as a sanity check but generally hopeless as one stop shopping for understanding.
Exploring, developing tactics, finding examples and counterexamples, is not replaceable by AI.
There is an M_3-->M_2 counterexample with trivial kernel.
Let AAA=A and BB=B, in the domain and codomain.
Map A to B and id to id.
There is an M_3-->M_2 counterexample with trivial kernel.
Let AAA=A and BB=B, in the domain and codomain.
Map A to B and id to id.
Define all arbitrary quotients of M.
Then show that the quotients of M form a thin category with all joins and meets.
Mod M by the universal group kernel, so that the quotient M1 is cancellative.
Now Mod M1 x M1 by the diagonal.
Define all arbitrary quotients of M.
Then show that the quotients of M form a thin category with all joins and meets.
Mod M by the universal group kernel, so that the quotient M1 is cancellative.
Now Mod M1 x M1 by the diagonal.
Same holds if we replace F with Cantor space C.
However each order preserving h:C-->C quotients to
h^:[0,1]-->[0,1] preserving the `dyadic rationals'
And vice versa, each h^ lifts to an h.
Same holds if we replace F with Cantor space C.
However each order preserving h:C-->C quotients to
h^:[0,1]-->[0,1] preserving the `dyadic rationals'
And vice versa, each h^ lifts to an h.
Everything those of us on this beat warned about happened, and then some. postsfromunderground.ghost.io/the-not-so-g...
Everything those of us on this beat warned about happened, and then some. postsfromunderground.ghost.io/the-not-so-g...
sarahkendzior.substack.com/p/a-shining-...
sarahkendzior.substack.com/p/a-shining-...
emilyriehl.github.io/files/reintr...
I've speculated about teaching an undergraduate level introduction to proofs course but using dependent type theory as the implicit formal system in place of set theory and first order logic.
emilyriehl.github.io/files/reintr...
I've speculated about teaching an undergraduate level introduction to proofs course but using dependent type theory as the implicit formal system in place of set theory and first order logic.
Dibs.
Dibs.
Hopefully this post will be moot, not mute.
Hopefully this post will be moot, not mute.
What ensures some planar continuum X has pi_1(X) homeomorphic to G, with the natural quotient topology?
What ensures some planar continuum X has pi_1(X) homeomorphic to G, with the natural quotient topology?
Closed subgroups need not be compactly generated.
If A is the group of all bounded sequences of integers, so that uniformly bounded null sequences converge to 0, let B denote the subgroup with b in B iff n divides b_n.
Closed subgroups need not be compactly generated.
If A is the group of all bounded sequences of integers, so that uniformly bounded null sequences converge to 0, let B denote the subgroup with b in B iff n divides b_n.
Start with X= [0,1] x {1,2,3,....}
Now glue together (0,n) and (0,m).
The quotient space is not 1st countable, despite being locally connected and uniquely arcwise connected.
Start with X= [0,1] x {1,2,3,....}
Now glue together (0,n) and (0,m).
The quotient space is not 1st countable, despite being locally connected and uniquely arcwise connected.
"Students pay premium prices for information that AI now delivers instantly and for free. A business student can ask ChatGPT to explain supply chain optimization or generate market analysis in seconds. The traditional lecture-and-test model faces its Blockbuster moment."
The entire bottom 50% of America is worth just $4.2 trillion.
Read that back.
When 400 people control more wealth than half a country’s population, we have a very serious problem.
The entire bottom 50% of America is worth just $4.2 trillion.
Read that back.
When 400 people control more wealth than half a country’s population, we have a very serious problem.
Suppose A is an abelian group.
Suppose U is a ` not both u and -u subset', if u is in U then -u is NOT in U.
Then vU is ALSO a ` not both u and -u' subset, for each automorphism v:A-->A.
Suppose A is an abelian group.
Suppose U is a ` not both u and -u subset', if u is in U then -u is NOT in U.
Then vU is ALSO a ` not both u and -u' subset, for each automorphism v:A-->A.
47^(73)= 932 mod 1009 , we can do this quickly with a cheap calculator, via repeated doubling, since 73=64+8+1.
But BOTH chatgpt and google AI cannot stick the landing on the question:
What is 47^(73) mod 1009?
47^(73)= 932 mod 1009 , we can do this quickly with a cheap calculator, via repeated doubling, since 73=64+8+1.
But BOTH chatgpt and google AI cannot stick the landing on the question:
What is 47^(73) mod 1009?
openletter.earth/open-letter-...