A Post by Yoav Paz-Priel and Richard Re on Their Joint Paper

On Wednesday, Nov. 19, 2025, Professor Danielle Citron delivered the 70th Henry J. Miller Distinguished Lecture at Georgia State University College of Law with a frank assessment of the current state ...

The Trump administration's lethal strikes are the apotheosis of the last quarter century's often always secret and often unreviewable executive branch legal reasoning.

<div> Between 1965 and 2013, many states and localities with histories of racial discrimination <span>in their voting practices were required to pre-clear

Former Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers will immediately leave his role as an instructor at Harvard while the University investigates his ties to child sex trafficker Jeffrey E. Epstein.

Youngjae Lee (Fordham University School of Law) has posted Reasonable Doubt and Implicit Bias (Criminal Law and Philosophy) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: In Criminal Testimonial Injustice, Jennifer Lackey argues that there is a kind of testimonial injustice, characterized by “an unwarranted excess of credibility” and that “[t]he excess of credibility…results in a distinctive kind of epistemic wrong” in “ways that are widespread, alarming, and pernicious” in our criminal justice system.

For many years, liberals have favored broad standing and conservatives narrow standing. Yet that pattern has disappeared and may be reversing. We studied the Su

<p><i>In a nation of stark inequalities, the Roberts Court is often portrayed as siding with the wealthy and powerful. Many scholars argue that the Court has ab

Article III protects federal judges with life tenure and salary guarantees. But politics still impacts federal courts, especially the Supreme Court.

AI optimists like to mention the “Jevons paradox.” But the Jevons paradox doesn’t tell us who will make money and who will get squeezed in the age of AI

If the Warren Court reflected nearly twenty years of jurisprudence dismantling ugly systems of oppression and institutional injustice that embedded invidious practices and policies into American law a...

Younger v. Harris is canonical in the field of federal courts, but its origins remain largely unknown. Examining diverse sources, this Article reconstructs...

As a matter of original public meaning, Article I's Necessary and Proper clause is the starting point for both Congress's power to create offices and the limits

Yale professor says wars in Ukraine and Gaza and threats from Donald Trump risk the ‘total collapse’ of the global courts system

The Warren Court’s legacy is ubiquitous. With the eponymous Chief Justice Warren at the helm, the Supreme Court featured a strong majority of left-of-center jurists, and those “liberal lions” ruled (o...

A revolution has occurred in the law of religious freedom. At this point, the picture is reasonably clear. The Supreme Court has greatly expanded the scope of the Free Exercise Clause.

The Warren Court’s legacy is ubiquitous. With the eponymous Chief Justice Warren at the helm, the Supreme Court featured a strong majority of left-of-center jurists, and those “liberal lions” ruled (o...

In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), a state law that prohibits transgender minors from accessing gender-affirming care.