Catherine Sheard
@sheardcat.bsky.social
1.8K followers 750 following 1.4K posts
Fellow @ University of Aberdeen. Professionally: macroevolution, especially birds & languages. Personally: drinks too much coffee, plays too much D&D. she/her
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
sheardcat.bsky.social
New pinned intro time:

Hi! I'm Catherine, a PI (fellow/lecturer) at the University of Aberdeen. My lab works on trait macroevolution, particularly the causes/consequences of behavioural innovations. I'm a senior editor at GEB, co-chair of BES Macro, and have zero chill about the northern lights.
the aurora in Norway, photographed by Catherine Sheard -- the sky is full of bright green waves, above a snowy mountain
the aurora in Aberdeen, photographed by Catherine Sheard -- the sky is purple and pink over a beach
sheardcat.bsky.social
say what now
atrupar.com
Hegseth: "I'm also proud that today we're signing a letter of acceptance to build a Qatari Emeri air force facility at the Mountain Home Airbase in Idaho."
Reposted by Catherine Sheard
profannawatts.bsky.social
Lol the Nobels can't even acknowledge women's contribution to discovery. But sure let's acknowledge The Machines.
Headline from an article in Nature this week that states "Prizes must recognize machine contributions to discovery. The future of science will be written by humans and machines together. Awards should reflect that reality."
Reposted by Catherine Sheard
juncowren.bsky.social
So excited to finally share our work on how birds responded to the 2024 Great American Eclipse! Thanks to @rosvall-lab.bsky.social for inviting me on this journey! I never expected any of my research to show up in @science.org, let alone on the cover. Surreal. I hope you enjoy it!
science.org
As the Moon eclipsed the Sun on 8 April 2024, birds took note.

Leveraging nature’s own experiment, scientists and the public joined forces to show how different species responded to sudden midafternoon darkness followed by a new “dawn.” Learn more this week in Science: https://scim.ag/48WbhLL
As the Moon eclipsed the Sun on 8 April 2024, birds like these rock pigeons (Columba livia) took note.
Reposted by Catherine Sheard
c0nc0rdance.bsky.social
The global whaling industry experienced a boom c. 1840-1950 as technology allowed whalers to hunt the Southern Ocean around Antarctica.

Under standard models, we would have expected krill populations to have *exploded*.

Instead, they DROPPED exponentially.

Let's talk about the KRILL PARADOX.
Change in distribution and abundance of southern right whales. (A) Shows historical and contemporary wintering distributions (Figure 1 from Carroll et al., 2018), and (B) shows decline in abundance and subsequent recovery (solid line is the mean, dashed line shows upper and lower 95% CI). Modified Figure 1 from Jackson et al. (2008). Contemporary sightings are divided into regions where large aggregations are seen during winter: Argentina (ARG), Brazil (BZL), South Africa (SAF), southwest Australia (SWA), south central Australia (SCA), and New Zealand sub-Antarctic (NZSA) and regions where sightings are typically of small numbers of individuals per year. The large aggregations are IWC management units and correspond to historical whaling grounds, although another 5 whaling grounds show little sign of recovery. Summer feeding areas are poorly described and so not shown.
sheardcat.bsky.social
This is a manuscript with 140 authors in an area I'm not super familiar with. Wiley no longer prompts authors to suggest reviewers, and the online interface is trash. Argh.
sheardcat.bsky.social
Holy cannoli it gets worse -- Wiley's AI for suggesting reviewers just suggested AN AUTHOR OF THE MANUSCRIPT.

Yes, Hal, I agree that this guy's research is highly relevant to this research. I know this because *it is his research*.
sheardcat.bsky.social
Well. I just learned that Wiley's new REX system allows you to invite people to review their own papers. How did I learn that? I bet you can guess...

(and before you @ me, I'm handling like 10 papers at the moment, and most with author lists >20)
Reposted by Catherine Sheard
Reposted by Catherine Sheard
wascherclaudia.bsky.social
Job alert: want to be my boss? 😁 The School of Life Sciences @ARU is looking for a new Head of School. It’s a great place to work with brilliant colleagues, students, and partners. Please share widely! #AcademicJobs #Leadership #LifeSciences #HigherEducation jobs.aru.ac.uk/vacancy/head...
Head of School of Life Sciences - ARU
jobs.aru.ac.uk
Reposted by Catherine Sheard
biorxiv-evobio.bsky.social
Tip rate estimates can predict future diversification, but are unreliable and context dependent https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.06.680809v1
sheardcat.bsky.social
"Right now, if one of my students came to me and said, 'Hey, as part of my Ph.D. I want to enter the world's birds into a dataset,' I'm like, 'No, you're not doing that. You'll never finish your Ph.D.' "

Too true omg 😂

Anyway, this is a very exciting dataset!

phys.org/news/2025-09...
BIRDBASE dataset tracks ecological traits for 11,589 species of birds
Çağan Şekercioğlu was an ambitious, but perhaps naive graduate student when, 26 years ago, he embarked on a simple data-compilation project that would soon evolve into a massive career-defining achiev...
phys.org
sheardcat.bsky.social
I totally get it -- it's a truly, stupidly awful system.
sheardcat.bsky.social
FOR SURE.

(It's on the list of things GEB is trying to get Wiley to change, fwiw.)
sheardcat.bsky.social
Ah, gotcha. I haven't bothered in years trying to get a GEB EA to invite people in the way/order/quantity that I wanted -- I always just invited them myself. 😅

Again, moot point, but in the new system I use the notes section for my list. (In defense of REX, I genuinely like the notes section.)
sheardcat.bsky.social
I suppose a moot point since you've resigned from GEB, but fwiw -- most of my invitations are marked as "declined" (probably the same proportion as actively declined in the old version?), and I can invite as many reviewers as I want (and in whatever order I want). 🤷‍♀️
sheardcat.bsky.social
At the moment authors can only suggest reviewers via the cover letter (and please do!).

AFAIK, there is indeed no way for reviewers to suggest alternates when declining (besides emailing the handling editor, I guess)
sheardcat.bsky.social
It is SO BAD. We're trying so hard at GEB to fix things, but holy cannoli y'all.

(This is the thing I was ranting about earlier today.)
jacquelyngill.bsky.social
The new Wiley journal review system is an absolute nightmare. Editorial assistants have been replaced by a clunky, AI-enabled website that makes it harder to find and invite reviewers. Associate editor workloads have increased. I'm not convinced the invitations to reviewers are even going through.
sheardcat.bsky.social
For realz. Why the hell does REX think that papers where a revision has been requested belongs in the same category as "papers where 1, but not 2, reviewers have agreed". Why. WHY.
sheardcat.bsky.social
Also, REX tells you when *one* reviewer has submitted their review, but not when *all* reviewers have submitted their reviews. I hate it.