Krishna Shrinivas
@shrinivaslab.bsky.social
1.9K followers 170 following 38 posts
Asst. prof at Northwestern ChBE Interested in how molecules and processes are organized and regulated in living cells | physics, math, engineering, and computation (mostly) for biology shrinivaslab.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
Preprint!

Inspired by condensates that form on specific DNA, we ask:

can we design multicomponent fluids to form distinct condensates on diff. surfaces?

i.e. perform classification by condensation ⚛️ 💻 exploiting phase transitions beyond compartmentalization!
arxiv.org/abs/2509.08100
(1/2)
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
Our framework:

We bridge machine learning & statistical physics to directly invert molecular simulations to design IDPS and engineer examples that:

🌀 form loops & linkers with tuned flexibility
⚡ sense salt, temperature, or phosphorylation stimuli
🤝 bind disordered targets like FUS or Whi3
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
The problem:
AI tools like AlphaFold & ProteinMPNN accelerate design of stable protein folds by inverting the sequence-structure map.

But IDPs don't have 1 shape - they occupy a huge ensemble of shapes. Physics simulations are good models to generate ensembles but hard to design/invert over!
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
Happy to share our latest in @natcomputsci.nature.com
led by (amazing) Ryan Krueger + colab w M. Brenner!

We introduce a framework to directly design intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) from physics-based simulations.
🧬 doi.org/10.1038/s435...
📰 www.mccormick.northwestern.edu/news/article...
Reposted by Krishna Shrinivas
kkukreja.bsky.social
Our review on cell cycle – cell fate (de)coupling is out! doi.org/10.1242/dev....
Was a lot of fun writing this with Allon Klein, reading old papers(earliest from 1902), and speculating on why cell cycle progression is not necessary for differentiation across many many tissues and species.
(1/3)
Coupling and decoupling of the cell cycle from cell differentiation in development
Summary: This Spotlight surveys investigations of the dependence of cellular differentiation on the cell cycle in animals. Strict dependence is uncommon. The decoupling of the cell cycle and different...
doi.org
Reposted by Krishna Shrinivas
lindorfflarsen.bsky.social
A good day to remember John Gurdon’s school report from his biology master at Eton
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
Many congrats Alex! Your labs research has been a pleasure to read (and try code openly). Hope you are celebrating 🍾
Reposted by Krishna Shrinivas
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
Preprint!

Inspired by condensates that form on specific DNA, we ask:

can we design multicomponent fluids to form distinct condensates on diff. surfaces?

i.e. perform classification by condensation ⚛️ 💻 exploiting phase transitions beyond compartmentalization!
arxiv.org/abs/2509.08100
(1/2)
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
Led by the amazing Aidan Zentner, with contribs from Ethan Halingstad, and in collab with Cameron Chalk, Michael Brenner, @amurugan.bsky.social, and Erik Winfree.

For a more fun overview, see Erik's version of the abstract www.dna.caltech.edu/DNAresearch_... :) (2/2)
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
Preprint!

Inspired by condensates that form on specific DNA, we ask:

can we design multicomponent fluids to form distinct condensates on diff. surfaces?

i.e. perform classification by condensation ⚛️ 💻 exploiting phase transitions beyond compartmentalization!
arxiv.org/abs/2509.08100
(1/2)
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
Extra curiosities 🔍
•⁠ ⁠Across tissues & species, stoichiometries of NONO/FUS are conserved, hinting at evolutionary tuning.
•⁠ ⁠Simulations by Mary Skillicorn in the lab also suggest important roles for co-transcriptional nucleation of paraspeckles for tuning paraspeckle size/number.
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
Another surprise: core & shell proteins don’t mix well (they’re immiscible, like oil & water).

Putting these observations together in simulations suggests 🖥️⚛️: competition for RNA + immiscibility naturally push proteins to form different layers, even if they individually like the same parts of RNA.
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
We combined in vitro assays of binding and condensation with bioinformatics to ask which parts of NEAT1 each protein preferred binding to.

Surprise: core proteins (FUS, NONO) actually prefer the same shell RNA regions as the shell protein TDP-43! Everyone crowds into the same RNA zones. 🌀
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
Prevailing model suggests:

→ “Core” proteins bind the middle of the NEAT1 RNA scaffold
→ “Shell” proteins bind the RNA ends

This selective binding could, in principle, assemble layers - but has not been explicitly tested. So we set out to do this!
shrinivaslab.bsky.social
We use paraspeckles as a model to study this question.

Paraspeckles are built around a non-coding RNA NEAT1 whose middle regions are in the core and 5’/3’ ends on the shell layer - each layer also recruiting different proteins. (2/6)
Reposted by Krishna Shrinivas
shechnerlab.bsky.social
Hello! Ever wonder what's "talking to" your favorite transcript, but were too scared to ask? In our review in @cp-cellreports.bsky.social, @mardakheh.bsky.social and I highlight new RNA-focused tools for discovering RNA interactions across organizational scales. Checkit!

tinyurl.com/ydn6e3ac