It's Jamie
@sjamieit.bsky.social
740 followers 300 following 590 posts
Municipal issues, data, transportation, history, yelling at drivers. Serious ideas, unserious person. Lots of original content. Pretend journalist. 🚲👶🌳 Centretown, Ottawa, Ontario
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
sjamieit.bsky.social
So many owners male these illegal modifications right before selling the property, leaving the buyer with the fines and remediation costs when they're found out.
sjamieit.bsky.social
Except what has happened time and time again, is that when the city rolls up to do work, the residents complain and the city reinstates all their illegal parking spaces rather than deal with the hassle.
sjamieit.bsky.social
The city thinks the solution is to license landscapers so that they're aware of the By-laws. I'm not so sure that's going to work. I guess they're just unaware that they can't park on the sidewalk either, right?

If only we licensed drivers, they would certainly follow the rules.
sjamieit.bsky.social
The city put out a memo a couple back saying they won't enforce anything pre-2007 because of how much work it is to determine if they're grandfathered in from pre-1965, but even still they can't keep up with enforcement of even newer violations.
sjamieit.bsky.social
But like what has been happening lately, the city can't keep up with enforcement of illegal front yard parking spaces, even though they've been illegal since 1965. They want to formally legalize everything older than 2007, simply to deal with the backlog and complexity of enforcement.
sjamieit.bsky.social
The new zoning by-law allows front yard parking where it's the ONLY parking space on the property, and there's no garage..This is good, because it means they can build homes with more living space and still include a parking spot. Garages aren't required to have a single parking space.
sjamieit.bsky.social
And more parking spaces means more cars. We know the negative effects of having so many cars in the city. Perhaps simply limiting parking limits those negative effects. This city simply dedicates far too much land to car storage as it is already.
sjamieit.bsky.social
Then there's the issue of trees, water run off, flooding, urban heat islands, esthetics even, gardens. What I'm getting at is that these parking spaces are not greenspace. Even if they're private properties, people can't pave over their entire properties without that affecting everyone else nearby.
sjamieit.bsky.social
What I'm getting at is that what people do on their own property in this case has an effect on public property and other people, so the city should be able to set rules on what's allowed.
sjamieit.bsky.social
The more front parking spaces there are, the more of these private access points you need to have, and each one involves a curb cut, or a dipped or sloped side walk, or a break in a protected cycle-lane, or a bumpy cycle track. Also another conflict point with cars crossing sidewalks and bike lanes
sjamieit.bsky.social
Also, a parking space is not only a parking space, if done though the proper legal process, or grandfathered in, it also includes a private approach, which is an easement or right of way across the city's land to your property. An almost privatization of public land.
sjamieit.bsky.social
Someone said to me, what's the reason for not allowing people to park where they want on their property?

Well, in many cases, they're not parking on their own property, it's city property. So in those cases, I think it's reasonable that the city gets to set the rules.
sjamieit.bsky.social
Is ridiculous that it's up to citizens to report these properties. The By-law officer said "someones driving around and reporting every property violation they come across" as though that's a problem. This person is doing By-law's job for free. Why isn't By-law driving around proactively enforcing?
sjamieit.bsky.social
I head again today from Ottawa By-law, they're no longer accepting reports for illegal driveway expansions or hardscaping or front yard parking. Apparently there are only 4 officers for these zoning issues and there are far too many reports than they can keep up with. They need more resources.
sjamieit.bsky.social
The RCMP officer got in contact with the driver of the truck this morning. The officer told me that the driver said he thought he had given me enough room when passing. 🤨
sjamieit.bsky.social
Way closer in person even . The wide angle lens makes it seem further away.
sjamieit.bsky.social
Yes. I've already contacted the RCMP.
sjamieit.bsky.social
Close-passed by a transport truck this morning, which by the way, isn't even allowed to use this road (NCC Driveway - no commercial vehicles).
sjamieit.bsky.social
Does anyone actually prefer the signalized crossing on Bay Street at Gladstone over the stop sign and PXO at Somerset?

I've spent over 3 minutes waiting at this intersection before. It seems most people prefer to just look both ways and cross against the light.
sjamieit.bsky.social
Yes, it will be a bit more expense, but the city should do it anyway. They plan to expropriate land from several gas stations on St Laurent for that project, so it's not like they refuse to take ownership of gas station land. They just don't want to spend the money on us.
sjamieit.bsky.social
Watermain break? 1952 install year.
sjamieit.bsky.social
So strange that Fernbank is not a truck route, but downtown streets like Elgin, Gladstone, Somerset, etc are.
sjamieit.bsky.social
That's why we don't allow them to use the street as a through street. Put in some modal filters or traffic diverters and suddenly a dangerous street is so quiet it's safe enough to bike in the roadway.
sjamieit.bsky.social
I find we always get the scale wrong on these. Look at these actual Dutch protected intersections. Those bike lanes are wide enough to drive a car down them.
sjamieit.bsky.social
I have no issue with this. Cars and bikes only need to be separated when there are high speeds and volumes of car traffic. Instead of separation, we can limit though traffic to make the street safe to bike on.