slderry.bsky.social
@slderry.bsky.social
20 followers 3 following 650 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
I'm a conservative, not that it should matter in the least. Why does it matter, again?

One thing that makes people distrust science is when they are told partial information with an intent to deceive. They will find out eventually and think less of you, at least the smart ones will.
The military vaccine mandates were in 2021 under Biden.

They were mandated because/after the FDA approved Comirnaty, a branded Pfizer vaccine.

In actuality, Comirnaty was never produced in 2021 so the mandates were based on a fraud. Everyone got a legally experimental vaccine dose.

Disgraceful.
The mRNA in Covid vaccines was modified and is not the same as your body's natural mRNA.

This is not a right-wing talking point, people.

Two people literally won the Nobel prize in 2023 for engineering the modified mRNA.

Vaccine mRNA can last months in the body, now verified in many studies.
You are changing the subject. You said vaccine mRNA breaks down quickly.

All vaccine recipients were told that.

Evidence shows that it does not break down quickly.

Whether authorities knew this or not, they lied to the public.

That is violation of informed consent. Do you care? Yes or no.
In 2022, Stanford published an article in Cell with the finding that mRNA vaccinated people showed mRNA and vaccine spike protein in lymph tissue at least 56 days after the last dose.

Other studies have now shown vaccine spike in people years after the last vaccination. See the Yale study.
My point is that less spike protein is better for your body.

Things that make spike protein:
1. Covid
2. Covid mRNA vaccines
What madness?

Spike protein inhibits the P53 pathway that defends against cancer.

There's absolutely no reason to flood the body with this protein via mRNA vaccines.

That said, I drive by people who inject fentanyl and don't jump out and stop them, so go ahead with your boosters.
Is she expecting new pathogens to, erm , emerge?

I hope it will not be a Covid-like frankenvirus with a deadly binding domain.

Because if scientists release another engineered virus that kills people, it will not be to a gullible public this time.

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Oh, that would be so funny. They could stick it to the unvaccinated!

"...COVID-19 vaccination could be associated with an increased risk of six specific cancer types, including thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancers."

biomarkerres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
1-year risks of cancers associated with COVID-19 vaccination: a large population-based cohort study in South Korea - Biomarker Research
The oncogenic potential of SARS-CoV-2 has been hypothetically proposed, but real-world data on COVID-19 infection and vaccination are insufficient. Therefore, this large-scale population-based retrospective study in Seoul, South Korea, aimed to estimate the cumulative incidences and subsequent risks of overall cancers 1 year after COVID-19 vaccination. Data from 8,407,849 individuals between 2021 and 2023 were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance database. The participants were categorized into two groups based on their COVID-19 vaccination status. The risks for overall cancer were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, and data were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The HRs of thyroid (HR, 1.351; 95% CI, 1.206–1.514), gastric (HR, 1.335; 95% CI, 1.130–1.576), colorectal (HR, 1.283; 95% CI, 1.122–1.468), lung (HR, 1.533; 95% CI, 1.254–1.874), breast (HR, 1.197; 95% CI, 1.069–1.340), and prostate (HR, 1.687; 95% CI, 1.348–2.111) cancers significantly increased at 1 year post-vaccination. In terms of vaccine type, cDNA vaccines were associated with the increased risks of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers; mRNA vaccines were linked to the increased risks of thyroid, colorectal, lung, and breast cancers; and heterologous vaccination was related to the increased risks of thyroid and breast cancers. Given the observed associations between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer incidence by age, sex, and vaccine type, further research is needed to determine whether specific vaccination strategies may be optimal for populations in need of COVID-19 vaccination.
biomarkerres.biomedcentral.com
No one wants Covid mRNA vaccines to cause cancer. I'm unvaccinated and I certainly don't want that.

Unfortunately, the spike protein attacks our cancer defense system. The South Koreans have found higher rates of certain cancers in the vaxxed/boosted.

biomarkerres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
1-year risks of cancers associated with COVID-19 vaccination: a large population-based cohort study in South Korea - Biomarker Research
The oncogenic potential of SARS-CoV-2 has been hypothetically proposed, but real-world data on COVID-19 infection and vaccination are insufficient. Therefore, this large-scale population-based retrospective study in Seoul, South Korea, aimed to estimate the cumulative incidences and subsequent risks of overall cancers 1 year after COVID-19 vaccination. Data from 8,407,849 individuals between 2021 and 2023 were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance database. The participants were categorized into two groups based on their COVID-19 vaccination status. The risks for overall cancer were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, and data were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The HRs of thyroid (HR, 1.351; 95% CI, 1.206–1.514), gastric (HR, 1.335; 95% CI, 1.130–1.576), colorectal (HR, 1.283; 95% CI, 1.122–1.468), lung (HR, 1.533; 95% CI, 1.254–1.874), breast (HR, 1.197; 95% CI, 1.069–1.340), and prostate (HR, 1.687; 95% CI, 1.348–2.111) cancers significantly increased at 1 year post-vaccination. In terms of vaccine type, cDNA vaccines were associated with the increased risks of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers; mRNA vaccines were linked to the increased risks of thyroid, colorectal, lung, and breast cancers; and heterologous vaccination was related to the increased risks of thyroid and breast cancers. Given the observed associations between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer incidence by age, sex, and vaccine type, further research is needed to determine whether specific vaccination strategies may be optimal for populations in need of COVID-19 vaccination.
biomarkerres.biomedcentral.com
What protein does the mRNA Covid vaccines induce the body to make as an antigen?

If you said "spike protein" then you are correct.
As I was mentioning, it is not whether the mRNA vaccines are effective for Covid, it is whether they have undesired side effects.

For instance, I don't want my body flooded with a protein that inhibits my ability to fight cancers.

www.oncotarget.com/article/2858...
Transfected SARS-CoV-2 spike DNA for mammalian cell expression inhibits p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer... | Oncotarget
https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28582 Shengliang Zhang, Wafik S. El-Deiry
www.oncotarget.com
1. I hope not.

2. You don't know this so I have no idea why you are making this claim.

This paper describes the action of Covid spike protein on the P53 pathway, an essential anti-cancer mechanism in our bodies.

The bad news: spike protein inhibits P53.

www.oncotarget.com/article/2858...
Transfected SARS-CoV-2 spike DNA for mammalian cell expression inhibits p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer... | Oncotarget
https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28582 Shengliang Zhang, Wafik S. El-Deiry
www.oncotarget.com
If it works, then why don't you get it and leave unvaccinated people alone?
You do not understand the science.

When IgG4 binds to the viral antigen, the virus is not targeted by the immune system for destruction.

Additionally, IgG4 blocks the ability of IgG1 to bind to virus (by competition) and makes it less effective. IgG1 is the antibody that works to kill Covid.
For instance, mRNA Covid vaccines are known to cause IgG4 (a type of antibody) class-switching.

Ideally the body produces mostly IgG1 because that antibody helps kill viruses.

Pfizer causes the body to produce IgG4 which does not.

immunityageing.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
Repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination results in IgG4 class switching and decreased NK cell activation by S1-specific antibodies in older adults - Immunity & Ageing
Background Previous research has shown that repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination leads to a marked increase of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific serum antibodies of the IgG4 subclass, indicating far-reaching immunoglobulin class switching after booster immunization. Considering that repeated vaccination has been recommended especially for older adults, the aim of this study was to investigate IgG subclass responses in the ageing population and assess their relation with Fc-mediated antibody effector functionality. Results Spike S1-specific IgG subclass concentrations (expressed in arbitrary units per mL), antibody-dependent NK cell activation, complement deposition and monocyte phagocytosis were quantified in serum from older adults (n = 38–50, 65–83 years) at one month post-second, -third and -fifth vaccination. Subclass distribution in serum was compared to that in younger adults (n = 64, 18–47 years) at one month post-second and -third vaccination. Compared to younger individuals, older adults showed increased levels of IgG2 and IgG4 at one month post-third vaccination (possibly related to factors other than age) and a further increase following a fifth dose. The capacity of specific serum antibodies to mediate NK cell activation and complement deposition relative to S1-specific total IgG concentrations decreased upon repeated vaccination. This decrease associated with an increased IgG4/IgG1 ratio. Conclusions In conclusion, these findings show that, like younger individuals, older adults produce antibodies with reduced functional capacity upon repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Additional research is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying these responses and their potential implications for vaccine effectiveness. Such knowledge is vital for the future design of optimal vaccination strategies in the ageing population.
immunityageing.biomedcentral.com
Informed consent IS when you get to choose freely.

It IS when information about the medical procedure is honestly disclosed.

It is NOT when you are forced to vaccinate under threat of punishment.

It is NOT when clinical data for the vaccine you're taking is hidden for 75 years.
4/
Now, Jimmie boasts "Informed consent is back" because it's now shared clinical decision making

But informed consent never left
That's the conversation you have about risks and benefits before you CHOOSE to get it

Jimmie’s lying

See Dorit Reiss's well-informed take: www.npr.org/2025/10/06/n...
The CDC says people must consult a health professional before COVID shot
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention accepted a controversial recommendation from outside vaccine advisers to tighten guidelines for the COVID vaccine.
www.npr.org
Informed consent is when you are not mandated (coerced) to take a vaccine under threat of punishment (job loss).

Example: the Biden government's Covid mandates and Democrat state and city leaders who imposed them on workers.
You have no right to coerce people into taking a vaccine.

The Covid mRNA vaccines are linked to cardiovascular and neurological problems. There are also irreversible immune problems in some people.

No one is obliged to play Russian roulette with their health for you.
It makes sense for Hegseth recruit straight, white males because they are the main demographic group that has stopped joining.

Gay people are 2% of the US population. There's no point in catering to a group that's so small.

Are more women needed, really? They're limited in combat roles.
It should not be mandatory. That's a violation of informed consent.

If the vaccine works, you don't need to force other people to get it. You can just get it yourself.
Reposted
NO it should NOT be mandatory. It is flawed science, doesn't stop the spread and does not immunize. And note, people own their OWN bodies. What should be mandatory is exposing the agenda and all those involved that created and facilitated the 'pandemic' after it was rehearsed at 'Event 201'.
What are people like you like?

If you mean black people, of course the military should cultivate black recruits. But demographically, white people are 60% of the population and dropped to 44% of recruits in 2023. That accounts for 15,000 missing recruits in 2022 and 2023.

That's a big shortfall.
1/3 of military recruits have a parent in the military. 65% of the military leans conservative.

These are the key demographic pools for recruitment.

Which demographic groups that will refuse to join if the military stops endorsing progressive politics?