Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
LightNews LightNews
banner
slurmqueen.bsky.social
Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
@slurmqueen.bsky.social
650 followers 1.5K following 2.3K posts
The Dolores Claiborne of BlueSky. 🌒
DC = 🏠
Posts Replies Media Videos
Pinned
slurmqueen.bsky.social
Brent, already full of turkey 🦃 @slurmqueen.bsky.social · Oct 24
“He looks like Earthworm Jim, but with cancer.”
Reposted by Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
mediaite.com
Jan. 6 Cop Fanone Goes Off On ‘Clown’ Jake Tapper — Compares Him To Trump VP
Jan. 6 Cop Fanone Goes Off On ‘Clown’ Jake Tapper — Compares Him To Trump VP
Michael Fanone tore into CNN's Jake Tapper, calling him a "clown" and "JD Vance-ish," and asking "Where the f*ck is he" while Trump deteriorates. The post Jan. 6 Cop Fanone Goes Off On ‘Clown’ Jake Tapper — Compares Him To Trump VP first appeared on Mediaite.
dlvr.it
November 27, 2025 at 1:57 PM
Reposted by Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
nagy-minaj.bsky.social
Have you even given thanks once?
November 27, 2025 at 4:05 PM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
need to go out in some Winkers with the boys. youtube.com/watch?v=8Xrh...
Winkers tm Halloween
YouTube video by WAJ1936
youtube.com
November 27, 2025 at 3:41 AM
Reposted by Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
lfschleusener.bsky.social
"ACT UP worked because America worked. I’m not sure we expected that, even as we hoped for it. It taught me that everything that is marginal and powerful in American life eventually becomes central...
November 27, 2025 at 2:58 AM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
Share a TV series you’ve watched from beginning to end more than once.
November 27, 2025 at 3:30 AM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
Dog sitting tonight
A piglet sitting on a bean bag chair and licking its snout.
November 27, 2025 at 3:10 AM
Reposted by Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
jotomami.bsky.social
Meme saying “Didn't mean to moan like that my bad”
November 27, 2025 at 2:46 AM
Reposted by Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
drsweety303.bsky.social
My new daughter Psoriasis Harvard-Lynn, arrived yesterday..a true unconventional beauty.
(A bit fugly but I am willing to see the beauty in her due to my open mind)…
November 16, 2025 at 12:55 PM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
Just saw a prescription drug commercial and one of the side effects was that your taint could bleed.
November 27, 2025 at 1:48 AM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
My post-gummy Taco Bell delivery order
November 27, 2025 at 1:33 AM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
You’ve been kidnapped. The characters from the last TV show you watched are trying to rescue you. Who’s coming to save you?

Im saved. 🤖 🎦 🍿
November 27, 2025 at 12:39 AM
Reposted by Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
geftokingmongoose.bsky.social
No thoughts just They Might Be Giants on Home Movies
Still from the television show Home Movies showing the band They Might Be Giants who are camp counselors in the episode with Dwayne
November 26, 2025 at 11:34 PM
Reposted by Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
northslider.bsky.social
I hate gay Thanksgiving…what do you need “My high school bully just apologized for everything, healed my younger self, and bred me.”
“My high school bully just apologized for everything, healed my younger self, and bred me.”
November 26, 2025 at 9:09 PM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
The bullet casings are gonna say “I AM SEN. MARK KELLY” this time, aren’t they?
phillewis.bsky.social Phil Lewis @phillewis.bsky.social · 1d
WASHINGTON (AP) — Two National Guard members have been shot in Washington, D.C., and their condition isn't known, AP source says.
November 26, 2025 at 8:16 PM
Reposted by Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
throatspiders.bsky.social
It seems worth noting that Wendell Felder won his 2024 Democratic primary with less than 24% of the vote.
maustermuhle.bsky.social Martin Austermuhle @maustermuhle.bsky.social · 2d
NEWS: Ward 7 Councilmember Wendell Felder is introducing emergency legislation that would delay ranked-choice voting, which is currently set to be rolled out in D.C. in 2026. His bill would mandate that Board of Elections conduct an assessment on what it would need to implement RCV.
November 26, 2025 at 3:54 PM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
Pee is stored in the balls, Charlie Brown
geftokingmongoose.bsky.social Gef the Toking Mongoose @geftokingmongoose.bsky.social · 1d
An escalator can never break it can only become stairs, Charlie Brown
frenchys-goldau.bsky.social Frenchy's Prospecting (Now in 3 new flavours) @frenchys-goldau.bsky.social · 2d
Today a man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration; that we are one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively and that there's no such thing as death and life is only a dream, Charlie Brown
November 26, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Reposted by Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
dumbeffotry.bsky.social
I'm reading the gay hockey novels and I'm deeply, deeply sexually frustrated.
November 26, 2025 at 2:50 AM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
It me
nixostorme.bsky.social it’s ya baster boi Nix🦃 @nixostorme.bsky.social · 1d
An underrepresented identity is the gay oldest son
November 26, 2025 at 12:11 PM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
Jeanne Dielman, 23 quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles in the Multiverse of Madness.
benjaminkabak.com Ben K. @benjaminkabak.com · 2d
If you were a despotic president, what movie would you force Hollywood to make? I want to see Quentin's Star Trek movie or maybe Kill Bill Vol 3.
November 26, 2025 at 3:35 AM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
Watching a show and someone just called someone else a “toenail-eating motherfucker”
November 26, 2025 at 3:31 AM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
Me when I’m an onion:
Vandinho from Pumaman #MST3K
November 26, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Reposted by Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
jmaylax.bsky.social
I know an Applebee’s booth hates to see them on a date night
Football guy and that girl from your high school choir on a podcast
November 25, 2025 at 8:42 PM
Reposted by Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
bobertonbluesky.bsky.social
This whole affair evidences an organized ruthlessness I was unaware Dem/left-aligned folks could successfully wield.
mjsdc.bsky.social Mark Joseph Stern @mjsdc.bsky.social · 2d
When liberals secured a majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2023, they changed internal procedures—over the objection of the conservative chief justice, who claimed they were taking away her power. Today the justices released MESSY details about the affair...
www.wicourts.gov/sc/rulhear/D...
BRIAN HAGEDORN, J. (concurring). The Wisconsin Supreme Court is composed of seven justices who are supposed to be members of the same team. Unlike trial courts, when we act, we do so collectively. To accomplish this, over the last 175 years, this court has established various practices and traditions, both formal and informal. These practices ensure all voices are heard, create clear lines of decision-making authority, and establish consistent and neutral processes to govern our case-deciding and administrative work. Some of these are reflected in formally adopted Supreme Court Rules, and some in our Internal Operating Procedures. But the true currency of a court like ours is trust. When trust is broken like it has been here, every aspect of our work suffers. ¶2 This all began in the summer of 2023 when four justices wished to make significant changes to how this court functions. Fair enough. These modifications could have been pursued through a process built on collegiality and mutual respect. Instead, my colleagues pursued a more destructive path. ¶3 The morning our then-newest justice was sworn into office——August 1, 2023——my four colleagues at that time set off to reshape our court and the operation of the court system. They had apparently engaged in significant discussions in the months prior and decided to force through these changes during our summer recess, and to do so via email with or without the input of their other colleagues. They issued a press release triumphantly announcing that these changes were all about transparency, accountability, and inclusivity. This was true in the same way Pearl Harbor was a strike for peace in the Pacific. I will not rehash every detail (Justice Ziegler's excellent writing recounts much of the history), but the reader deserves a taste. ¶4 The first shot sounded when my four colleagues fired the Director of State Courts, who functions as the CEO of administrative matters for the entire judicial branch. Without following any established process, one of my colleagues sent an email proposing that we fire our Director and install a new, preselected interim Director in his place. This happened through email, over the course of two business days, while the Director was out of town on state business, during our summer recess. He never received a performance review indicating concerns; he was simply told his employment was over. This came just months after some of these same colleagues emphasized the importance of having all justices participate in hiring key staff. ¶5 Later that same week, my colleagues proposed dramatic changes via email affecting both our case-deciding and administrative responsibilities. The email invited justices to attend a new, unscheduled meeting of the court later that week to discuss the proposals. One justice said she could not be there; another objected to the meeting as outside our court calendar. The meeting would go forward no matter what, we were told. I implored my colleagues to reconsider, to treat their fellow colleagues with the respect they would want if circumstances were reversed. They refused. The meeting went on as expected, and with only four members present, they voted to fundamentally remake our court. ¶7 Among their changes, my colleagues radically altered the role of the chief justice. They created a new, three-person administrative committee (on which the chief justice would ostensibly sit) to take over nearly all of the chief justice's most important administrative duties. And they did so in the face of serious objections that these changes violated the Wisconsin Constitution, which says the chief justice "shall be the administrative head of the judicial system." Wis. Const. art. VII, § 4. One justice who in the past championed the constitutional role of the chief justice suddenly changed course. Again, these actions stripping the chief justice of powers she had exercised for as long as anyone could remember were proposed via email, and were voted on a few days later during an unscheduled meeting of just four justices during our summer recess. Not exactly transparent, accountable, and inclusive. ¶8 Another significant series of amendments to our internal rules involved modifying the way we consider certain kinds of cases, essentially making it much easier for this court to expedite cases coming to us outside the normal appeals process. Why the change? As everyone understood, my colleagues had the not-sosecret goal of swiftly hearing particular politically charged cases. This was all by design. ¶9 And how did this experiment go? Not well. Administratively, it was not clear who was in charge. We experienced significant breakdowns in communication amidst a lack of clarity about who was doing what. Our staff was often caught in the middle of a court that did not have established lines of communication and authority. And when the Director of State Courts was unceremoniously fired for what many perceived as political reasons, it sent a shockwave through the system. Furthermore, my colleagues' changes were not one and done. Throughout the past two years, they continued to modify the court's procedures in a similar ad-hoc fashion, often after realizing problems with their earlier ill-considered changes. This only added to the confusion. ¶10 Finally, at one of the court's internal conferences this past June, my colleagues shifted course. One of the four announced she was "withdrawing" her prior votes from the past two years (which, by the way, is not a thing) with the idea that every disputed change was now, all of a sudden, reversed. What changed? Again, it was no mystery. My colleagues wanted to take power away from then-Chief Justice Annette Ziegler. Such a move ensured that my colleagues would run the court through the administrative committee. Following the April 2025 election, they concluded they would have the votes to elect a chief justice of their choosing and have a block of votes to support her, so they no longer needed to seize those powers. This is not a cynical take. It is exactly what happened. ¶11 What's past is past, however. I have no desire to hold this against my colleagues, and I am grateful they have changed course. In fact, I was happy to work collaboratively on many operational changes reflected in this order, most of which I
November 25, 2025 at 9:06 PM
Reposted by Brent, already full of turkey 🦃
andrewp97.bsky.social
IM SO FUCKING HAPPY
yasharali.bsky.social Yashar Ali 🐘 @yasharali.bsky.social · 2d
BREAKING

Muriel Bowser, the Mayor of Washington DC, says she will NOT be seeing a fourth term.
November 25, 2025 at 8:11 PM
slurmqueen.bsky.social
November 25, 2025 at 7:53 PM