Susan Greenhalgh
susangreenhalgh.bsky.social
Susan Greenhalgh
@susangreenhalgh.bsky.social
1.3K followers 250 following 160 posts
Senior Advisor for Election Security at Free Speech For People. Opinions are my own. Reposts don’t equal endorsements.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Susan Greenhalgh
Trump-Allied GOP Partisan Buys Dominion Voting Systems. Why Worry?: Today's #BradCast

Guest: Election security expert @susangreenhalgh.bsky.social Greenhalgh of @fsfp.bsky.social; Also: Trump tearing down entire East Wing of White House. Why worry?...

FULL STORY, LISTEN: bradblog.com?p=15538
Nah. When Cyber Ninjas petitioned for copies of Dominion software, Dominion said it would do "irreparable damage" to election security. Yet, it was revealed months later that the software was improperly obtained by Trump allies, Dominion didn't sue & was silent bcz it would reflect badly on Dominion
Reposted by Susan Greenhalgh
@susangreenhalgh.bsky.social on point as usual. If only Congress would do its job.
The announcement that the second-largest U.S. voting system vendor would be in the hands of a self-declared partisan sparked concerns and speculation on blogs and social media. slate.trib.al/B17ouxd
Trump’s Most Reviled Voting Company Sold to a GOP Official. That’s Not the Worst of It.
Earlier this month, news broke that Dominion Voting Solutions had been sold to a former Republican election official.
slate.trib.al
Why would you think Dominion would care about anything more than money?
The 2nd largest voting system company has been bought by a republican official, but that's not the worst of it. Want to understand what this all means? read @slate.com
Reposted by Susan Greenhalgh
The President is not a king.
The law is not a suggestion.
The Constitution is not optional.

🔗 www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymDt...
Hi 👋 I’m not that Susan Greenhalgh. 😀
Reposted by Susan Greenhalgh
Epstein Survivors Press Conference
Sept 3rd, 10:30 a.m. ET
Tune in to support them.
Reposted by Susan Greenhalgh
Essential background on Tina Peters, courtesy of @susangreenhalgh.bsky.social. Trump does NOT always stand by the people who commit crimes for him, so it has to be asked: why is he taking such an intense personal interest here?

slate.com/news-and-pol...
Or state election board sought to work with NSA. Any engagement or cooperation with NSA (or CISA) was entirely voluntary. The federal agencies also prioritized monitoring foreign influence operations activities through social media. They did not assess voting machines or have any access to them.
influence operations (false Facebook posts, which occurred in 2022). There are many aspects of elections and the segments NSA and its agencies focused on were systems like SOS websites, email networks, voter registration databases, or election night reporting systems, but only IF the SOS …
Great question!These media releases certainly give the impression that NSA was actually securing election infrastructure but if you read it closely NSA’s role was limited to sharing threat information (eg. Intelligence shows that an APT or threat actor is targeting elections networks) or disrupting…
Reposted by Susan Greenhalgh
What happens if you don’t do background checks or training for thousands of people and you give them all total authority?

ICE has been caught looting and destroying property at Pittsburgh restaurants. They even tried to break into the safes. They loaded food, supplies and equipment into vehicles

/
Then maybe pay attention to the fact that allies of T***p unlawfully took copies of the voting software in 2020-2022 already and have copies of it @marcelias.bsky.social
Cryptography legend and OG of evidence based elections Ron Rivest keynotes the Election Symposium at the #DEFCON33 @votingvillage.bsky.social
How effective were the audits conducted after the 2024 election to provide evidence to verify the computer generated results? We reviewed the post-election audits and found most lacking in basic properties for effective, meaningful audits. 👇
Reposted by Susan Greenhalgh
READ this important thread (all the way through) by my colleague @susangreenhalgh.bsky.social at @fsfp.bsky.social. The threats to election security are still prevalent even though this particular theory from This Will Hold is not credible. We must remain vigilant in protecting our elections.
There is a new substack circulating from This Will Hold alleging that an NSA whistleblower has claimed the NSA audited the 2024 election and found Trump did not win. I've received several inquiries on my thoughts on this (and I'm cited) so I wanted to offer this 🧵 for those that are interested. 1/