Tracy
@tcshields.bsky.social
640 followers 1.2K following 250 posts
personal account | opinions are my own and all that | too curious for my own good | avid reader (no, I probably won't share because y'all might get judgey) | she/her | #medlibs 🦀 #EvidenceSynthesis #SystematicReviews | 🌈 🌻
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
tcshields.bsky.social
This looks fantastic! Already registered and looking forward to learning #medlibs
tcshields.bsky.social
maman has switched out the kale for arugula in the papa's breakfast bowl and it is nowhere near what it was. I am so disappointed.
tcshields.bsky.social
If you need help, you can find a local food bank here: www.feedingamerica.org
If you want to help, look into local food banks or cooperatives that can assist. Feeding America is one place to start. 92.5% of support goes to food procurement
source: www.feedingamerica.org/sites/defaul...
www.feedingamerica.org
tcshields.bsky.social
Working directly for Uncle Sam doesn't insulate you from food insecurity. US military personnel have food insecurity, and that can impact readiness. "[S]tudies of individual military installations have demonstrated food insecurity rates between 15% and 33%"
source: www.ers.usda.gov/publications...
Comparing Food Insecurity Among the U.S. Military and Civilian Adult Populations | Economic Research Service
Readiness is a cornerstone of military service. Military readiness includes cognitive and physical abilities to train and execute missions. Previous studies among civilians demonstrate that food secur...
www.ers.usda.gov
tcshields.bsky.social
Food security is a range from no problems or limitations accessing food to altering eating habits because of quality or quantity, and everything in between. In 2023, 96% of US households surveyed reported they could not afford to eat balanced meals.
source: www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-...
Food Security in the U.S. - Definitions of Food Security | Economic Research Service
www.ers.usda.gov
tcshields.bsky.social
Food security/insecurity is a problem that touches everyone, whether you know it or not. Anyone could be at risk of not having enough food or inadequate nutrition.

"13.5 percent (18.0 million) of U.S. households were food insecure at some time during 2023"
source: www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-...
Food Security in the U.S. - Key Statistics & Graphics | Economic Research Service
www.ers.usda.gov
tcshields.bsky.social
I haven't been able to stop thinking about this, so here's a quick thread, with some curated #medlibs sources
tcshields.bsky.social
This press release is wild. Food (in)security is an ongoing issue in the US, whether the govt thinks it is or not. Go grab the past ones while you can: www.ers.usda.gov/publications...

www.usda.gov/about-usda/n...
Screenshot of text that reads:
"The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced the termination of future Household Food Security Reports. These redundant, costly, politicized, and extraneous studies do nothing more than fear monger.

For 30 years, this study—initially created by the Clinton administration as a means to support the increase of SNAP eligibility and benefit allotments—failed to present anything more than subjective, liberal fodder. Trends in the prevalence of food insecurity have remained virtually unchanged, regardless of an over 87% increase in SNAP spending between 2019 - 2023.

USDA will continue to prioritize statutory requirements and where necessary, use the bevy of more timely and accurate data sets available to it."
tcshields.bsky.social
And if you are hungry or don't have (enough) food, that's your own fault - bootstraps and all that - so why should the govt care anyway? 🙃
tcshields.bsky.social
#medlibs
tcshields.bsky.social
This press release is wild. Food (in)security is an ongoing issue in the US, whether the govt thinks it is or not. Go grab the past ones while you can: www.ers.usda.gov/publications...

www.usda.gov/about-usda/n...
Screenshot of text that reads:
"The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced the termination of future Household Food Security Reports. These redundant, costly, politicized, and extraneous studies do nothing more than fear monger.

For 30 years, this study—initially created by the Clinton administration as a means to support the increase of SNAP eligibility and benefit allotments—failed to present anything more than subjective, liberal fodder. Trends in the prevalence of food insecurity have remained virtually unchanged, regardless of an over 87% increase in SNAP spending between 2019 - 2023.

USDA will continue to prioritize statutory requirements and where necessary, use the bevy of more timely and accurate data sets available to it."
tcshields.bsky.social
This feels like a personal attack 🤣
(I love this so hard)
tcshields.bsky.social
This press release is wild. Food (in)security is an ongoing issue in the US, whether the govt thinks it is or not. Go grab the past ones while you can: www.ers.usda.gov/publications...

www.usda.gov/about-usda/n...
Screenshot of text that reads:
"The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced the termination of future Household Food Security Reports. These redundant, costly, politicized, and extraneous studies do nothing more than fear monger.

For 30 years, this study—initially created by the Clinton administration as a means to support the increase of SNAP eligibility and benefit allotments—failed to present anything more than subjective, liberal fodder. Trends in the prevalence of food insecurity have remained virtually unchanged, regardless of an over 87% increase in SNAP spending between 2019 - 2023.

USDA will continue to prioritize statutory requirements and where necessary, use the bevy of more timely and accurate data sets available to it."
tcshields.bsky.social
Well. That's not a good sign.
mr-info.bsky.social
Only found out about this today (we use it for DOCLINE delivery): "The NNLM will end support for delivery.nnlm.gov on Friday, December 19th 2025. The document delivery site will no longer be available after that date, and it will not be replaced with a similar service." #MedLibs
NNLM | NNLM Delivery
delivery.nnlm.gov
tcshields.bsky.social
I need that on a tshirt, tote, and sticker - stat. 😍
tcshields.bsky.social
So yeah, that's... something. So glad the Secretaries of Education and Health and Human Services schooled me in a WaPo opinion piece about... whatever.

I'm holding back so much snark and disdain at this point I might injure myself 🤣🙃

I think I might go eat some chocolate.
tcshields.bsky.social
Let's see, there's also a call out to the book "Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up" by Abigail Shrier that links to Amazon. Wonder if anyone gets a kickback from that?

There's a few more links but not to actual literature or evidence, so I'll stop here.
tcshields.bsky.social
I don't have the energy to see what that narrative review cites or fact check it. This little bit on chocolate (under Carbohydrates) did jump out at me though.

IDK, you think that implies chocolate consumption leads to violence? More like the opposite in my experience. 😂🥰🍫
screenshot of text that reads: "Chocolate often evokes happy feelings and reduces tension. The antidepressant effect of chocolate is due to its psychoactive chemical content, such as anandamides, which target opioid receptors in the central nervous system [45]. In a study conducted by Moreno-Dominguez et al. [46], excessive chocolate consumption was associated with more anxiety than moderate/low consumption."
tcshields.bsky.social
Narrative, so nothing approaching gold standard evidence synthesis like SR, meta-analysis, etc. with this listed as methods. All I can do about the "search" methods is sigh deeply and wish I had a dollar for every sus search I see described in the literature.
screenshot of text that reads
"Methods: The study is a narrative review. “Scopus”, ‘Web of Science’, ‘PubMed’ and ‘Google Scholar’ databases were used for literature search. The words “nutrition”, “crime”, “violence”, “psychology”, “psychology”, “behavior” and their combinations were used as keywords in the literature search and articles published between 2000 and 2024 were examined. After excluding articles whose full text could not be accessed and articles that were found to be missing important methodological details, 45 studies were included in the review."
tcshields.bsky.social
The PDF notes "new" evidence since FDA looked at the issue in 2011 - again this is dated 2016. So covering 5 years and almost 10 years out of date now, with 8 "new" citations, the most recent being 2014. Also, "antisocial and violent behaviors" show up nowhere in the doc - only "adverse behavior".
tcshields.bsky.social
But don't worry, I found it with some googling. It was published in 2016 and lists the *cough* evidence that supposedly suggest a link between food "bereft of nutrients and loaded with harmful ingredients" that increase antisocial and violent behaviors. OK sure.
PDF: www.cspi.org/sites/defaul...
www.cspi.org
tcshields.bsky.social
That first link goes to this: www.cspi.org/resource/sci..., which has a link to the resource as PDF. Which, LOL doesn't load - instead you get "we can't open this file something went wrong"

Something went wrong indeed.