TheSheepMafia
banner
thesheepmafia.bsky.social
TheSheepMafia
@thesheepmafia.bsky.social
1K followers 450 following 5.1K posts
He/Him. A leftist, antifascist, crossdressing cishet man. Proud to be both a nerd and an ally of LGBTQ folks everywhere. Lover of history, stillettos, music, fishnets, and dachshunds. Hater of cops, fascists, bigots, TERFs, and chuds of all varieties.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
I'm sorry, quick thing.

*deep inhale*

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Oh man, hahaha, fuck you Brianna Wu. Nice try bitch. You tried to ride that right wing grift train even though literally everyone told you exactly what would happen and now you're sad. Tough break, girl.
Sometimes in my pointless scrolling, I stumble across something that is so true that I'm shocked I've never even thought to consider it.

This? This is a hellfire missile of truth.
Gal Gadot, the Jared Leto of Women
It's the best, I'm so happy every time I see it in the wild.
I mean, I don't think there's a huge overlap between Broadway musical fans and, let's say, folks that had any fucking idea what Kendrick was talking about in "They Not Like Us". So if you want rap in a Broadway musical, it almost by default has to be for people scared of actual rap.
"Architects" by Rise Against features a line in the bridge ("don't you remember when we were young and we wanted to set the world on fire"), which is referencing "I Was A Teenage Anarchist" by Against Me! but adds "Because I still am and I still do."

youtu.be/NR3xVQy8ccM?...
Architects
YouTube video by Rise Against - Topic
youtu.be
Actually good advice to do that before writing, always, just so that, you know, hypothetically, maybe you don't include a weird teenage group sex scene in your otherwise mostly excellent demon clown horror book.
Apple Music has this really cool feature, infinite autoplay, which recommends music that may or may not be in your library that you might enjoy based on the songs you've picked before.

It's awesome because sometimes I forget how much Arcade Fire fucking sucks until it gets randomly inserted.
...patients who have lost the ability to pay (usually after Medicare runs out), which is so much worse than watching TikToks on the company's time. So I'm usually in the situation that a lot of us end up in too often of just "Well, fuck, I don't really care if anyone wins this one."
It's always fucked when the excessive sins of capitalism slam against the seemingly unending capacity that some humans have to be lazy pieces of shit. Like, sure, this guy is an asshole and whatever happens, that just is what it is. But also, we have weekly meetings about how to discharge...
I usually HATE writing people up, even for stuff that on paper is poor performance. Because there's burnout, personal stress, a thousand things other that aren't helped at all by getting put on a PIP, so it almost always feels like I'm kicking someone while they're down.

I was ok with this one.
Lol, completely.

99% of the time, I'm right with you. But this guy is in charge of our hospital's biomedical equipment and he's three months behind on preventative maintenance for things like ventilators and telemetry monitors, mostly because he spends a lot of time watching TikToks in his office.
I had to put an employee on a final performance improvement plan yesterday, since he hadn't hit his monthly metrics again. Had to tell him that he needs to take this seriously and be a professional.

I was a giant pink crayon, the other manager was Jason on an inflatable donkey.

It was great.
Like, just to use examples from my library, I love Tool. Lyrically very deep, instrumentally incredibly layered and complex. The kind of music that requires a good sound system to truly appreciate.

But I also like Motörhead, even though there's no message or complexity at all. It just rocks.
Out of curiosity, mostly for my own creative endeavors, do you find "people will enjoy listening to this, even if it's for a moment" to be a quality that makes something worth paying attention to? Or do you think that a good piece of music has to say something more meaningful?
Yeah. Kind of feels like seeing an AI snuff film. Like, I'm glad nobody was actually brutally murdered on camera, that's great. But I'm not chalking that one up as a win for AI. You still poisoned the water and ignited the sky to make a video nobody should ever even want to watch, much less enjoy.
Awww, maybe that's what monsters needed to stop being monsters!!

Happy birthday Jason!
Happy birthday Michael Myers (not Austin Powers)!
Happy birthday weird hillfolk from The Hills Have Eyes!

Nothing for you Freddie. You're a kiddie diddler. Everyone always forgets that. But he's an Epstein.
...and we can say dumb dingbat shit like "non-TI males" because using the word cismales is heretical to us for dumb dingbat reasons. Can't wait, see you soon.
Great. A study that I don't trust you to understand from an organization I don't trust to be objective in their research. Really glad you told me about it again. I'll get right on finding that one and then I'll totally be back so we can discuss it and I can tell you how much I agree with you now...
Cool. I've got fun news for you: nothing you're doing is going to do anything to make cis women safer and will only cause harm to trans people.

But I'm excited for you to feel safe and protected sharing a bathroom with this women. I'm sure you won't jump to any conclusions and freak out at all.
You keep rephrasing this as though we both agree on the fact that these trans women are actually men and should be categorized as such. We don't agree on this point, not even close, so any question that springs from this well is already poisoned.
Not a single piece that I think you would be willing to actually look at with any kind of objectivity and I'm not willing to waste that much of my time indulging in your weird internet humiliation fetish. This isn't my NSFW account, but if you can find it, DM me there and we can work out a rate.
...language in the study, much less perform any type of criticism of it yourself. Absolutely embarrassing shit.
...any information that you told me you have. By your own advice you don't ask questions, you seek that information yourself. So it must be a lot of reading. But you're terrible at that. So what am I supposed to assume about that last "fact" you dropped? I can't even assume you could follow the...
...Bluesky has character limits on posts and I assumed your ape brain would identify the pattern in my post and naturally think that I was asking more about your process, not a dramatic change of subject. Your reading comprehension was so wildly bad here that I honestly don't think I can trust...
...and two of them were literally about you. There's literally no other source I can check to see if you did something other than to ask you. Even the third one was an abbreviated question, with the obviously assumed meaning being "Did you research if this was peer reviewed?" I'm sorry that...