Tobias Egner
@tobiasegner.bsky.social
3.3K followers 410 following 45 posts
Professor of Psychology & Neuroscience at Duke University. Studying cognitive control, loving lots of other stuff. www.egnerlab.org
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Tobias Egner
alexatompary.bsky.social
The MAC lab at Drexel is looking for a new post-doc to work on NIH-funded projects investigating the intersection of prior knowledge and long-term memory consolidation. Please pass along to any interested lab members! careers.drexel.edu/cw/en-us/job...
Careers at Drexel - Human Resources
careers.drexel.edu
Reposted by Tobias Egner
aaronbornstein.bsky.social
Come work with us! UC Irvine Cognitive Sciences is looking for a new Assistant Professor to join our team: recruit.ap.uci.edu/JPF09896

I'm not on the committee, but happy to talk if you're interested.
Assistant Professor - Cognitive Sciences
University of California, Irvine is hiring. Apply now!
recruit.ap.uci.edu
tobiasegner.bsky.social
For fans of flexibility, new paper out in QJEP!
Domain-specific cognitive flexibility: Shift-readiness adaptations for task- and attention-switching are non-transferrable.
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com
Reposted by Tobias Egner
ashenhav.bsky.social
These job ads have now been posted! 🎉

Social/Personality: aprecruit.berkeley.edu/JPF05020

Biological Basis of Behavior: aprecruit.berkeley.edu/JPF05054

Please spread the word!
Reposted by Tobias Egner
hritz.bsky.social
We put out this preprint a couple months ago, but I really wanted to replicate our findings before we went to publication.

At first, what we found was very confusing!

But when we dug in, it revealed a fascinating neural strategy for how we switch between tasks

doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.29.615736

🧵
tobiasegner.bsky.social
Highly recommended!!!
janw.bsky.social
I will be looking to hire 2-3 post-docs over the course of the next few months to work on questions related to cognitive control in humans, using EEG, TMS, DBS, sEEG, fMRI, or related methods.

If you know anybody, please tell them to email me.

Formal ad to follow. Lab website: wessellab.org
Wessel Cognitive Neurology Lab | The University of Iowa
Thanks for visiting the Cognitive Neurology Lab at the University of Iowa. The lab is directed by Dr. Jan R. Wessel. We are affiliated with the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, the Depa...
wessel.lab.uiowa.edu
tobiasegner.bsky.social
New modeling paper, spearheaded by Raphael Geddert and Seth Madlon-Kay, now out in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review: "Modeling of control over task switching and cross-task interference supports a two-dimensional model of cognitive stability and flexibility".
Free read link: rdcu.be/epatc
Reposted by Tobias Egner
mariamaly.bsky.social
When you successfully anticipate future events, what happens to your ability to encode the present? 🤔

Successful prediction increases the likelihood of successful encoding. We speculate about how switching between distinct encoding & prediction states can produce this effect.
osf.io/preprints/ps...
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by Tobias Egner
katejj.bsky.social
OK here it is, the moment you have all been waiting for! Our advert for 5 posts here at Glasgow: Cognitive neuroscience/psychology. Closing date May 12 - please spread the word
www.nature.com/naturecareer...
Reposted by Tobias Egner
charan-neuro.bsky.social
I'm looking for a new full-time research assistant ("junior specialist"). It's not quite "lab manager" because I have someone who takes care of the administrative tasks, and here I'm looking for someone to help us get research done! Info is below, please pass on to any talented candidates, thanks!
Dynamic Memory Lab_Jr Specialist_Ranganath
University of California, Davis is hiring. Apply now!
recruit.ucdavis.edu
tobiasegner.bsky.social
Since the hotel bar is closed, you may as well check out some posters! #CNS2025: find our excellent grad student Jim Zhang at poster A91, "Neural correlates of concurrent demands on cognitive stability and flexibility".
tobiasegner.bsky.social
14 weeks, 29 lbs 🤔
tobiasegner.bsky.social
60% Pyr
15% German Shepherd
15% Siberian Husky
10% Chow Chow
tobiasegner.bsky.social
For something pleasant on your timeline, let me introduce you to our new family member, Captain: 60% Great Pyrenees, 100% cute!
Reposted by Tobias Egner
dramandar.bsky.social
Research America has created an action item link that sends 3 letters to support #NIH to your US Senators and Representative based on your zip code.

It takes only a minute or two to fill out.

You don’t need to be an academic to support #Science!

advocacy.charityengine.net/Default.aspx....
Research!America
The Research!America alliance advocates for science, discovery, and innovation to achieve better health for all. We urge Congress and the administration to increase funding for the National Institutes...
advocacy.charityengine.net
tobiasegner.bsky.social
Wow, this would lead to a massive contraction of academic biomedical research in the US.
tobiasegner.bsky.social
I think it’s in the eye of the beholder: It’s reactive in the sense of being triggered by previous trial conflict but the fact that it hangs around for a while suggests that the brain expects (implicitly) that a similar challenge may be forthcoming, and in that sense you could call it proactive.
tobiasegner.bsky.social
Up in the gods at Cameron tonight - a real treat!
tobiasegner.bsky.social
Wow, this place is really blowing up. Lots of new follower but nothing new to report from the world of cognitive psychology and neuroscience? Let's go with Sunday morning vibes instead...
Reposted by Tobias Egner
samversc.bsky.social
Some great news to start the week: our paper on ideomotor theory and voluntary control over autonomic processes inside the body (“interoactions”) was accepted in Psych Review!🧠💓🥳

With @mgblr.bsky.social and Marcel Brass

Preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps...

#PsychSciSky #cogpsych #interoception
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by Tobias Egner
mehr.nz
samuel mehr @mehr.nz · Sep 14
this is pretty amazing: @lucinauddin.bsky.social is taking on the giant, hugely profitable publishers of academic journals, on grounds of antitrust

If you'd like to join the case as a plaintiff you can sign up at www.lieffcabraser.com/antitrust/ac...

summary of the case:
The Publisher Defendants’ Scheme has three primary components. First, the Publisher Defendants agreed to not compensate scholars for their labor, in particular not to pay for their peer review services (the “Unpaid Peer Review Rule”). In other words, the Publisher Defendants agreed to fix the price of peer review services at zero. The Publisher Defendants also agreed to coerce scholars into providing their labor for nothing by expressly linking their unpaid labor with their ability to get their manuscripts published in the Publisher Defendants’ journals. In the “publish or perish” world of academia, the Publisher Defendants essentially agreed to hold the careers of scholars hostage so that the Publisher Defendants could force them to provide their valuable labor for free. Second, the Publisher Defendants agreed not to compete with each other for manuscripts by requiring scholars to submit their manuscripts to only one journal at a time (the “Single Submission Rule”). The Single Submission Rule substantially reduces competition among the Publisher Defendants, substantially decreasing incentives to review manuscripts promptly and publish meritorious research quickly. The Single Submission Rule also robs scholars of negotiating leverage they otherwise would have had if more than one journal offered to publish their manuscripts. Thus, the Publisher Defendants know that if they offer to publish a manuscript, the submitting scholar has no viable alternative and the Publisher Defendant can then dictate the terms of publication. Third, the Publisher Defendants agreed to prohibit scholars from freely sharing the scientific advancements described in submitted manuscripts while those manuscripts are under peer review, a process that often takes over a year (the “Gag Rule”). From the moment scholars submit manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants behave as though the scientific advancements set forth in the manuscripts are their property, to be shared only if the Publisher Defendants grant permission. Moreover, when the Publisher Defendants select manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants will often require scholars to sign away all intellectual property rights, in exchange for nothing. The manuscripts then become the actual property of the Publisher Defendants, and the Publisher Defendants charge the maximum the market will bear for access to that scientific knowledge.