Uriel Cohen Priva
@urielcohenpriva.bsky.social
75 followers 66 following 34 posts
Likely not here at all. Diverse, new, and dangerous opinions. www.urielcohenpriva.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
They're not "the same", and they are usually off by some linear operation, but the fact that they are not normally distributed simply doesn't matter
Linguists seem to believe that modeling an effect using random effects causes the estimation to be very different than using fixed effects, because random effects are assumed to be normally distributed. Usually, the estimates are (almost) identical, regardless of the actual distribution.
The R code shown is:
g <-  1:200 |> as.character()
g.x <- 2**rnorm(length(g))
n <- 10**4
y <- rnorm(n) + g.x
d <- data.frame(y, g)
m.lmer <- lmer(y ~ 0 + (1 | g), d)
m.lm <- lm(y ~ 0 + g, d)
cor(coefficients(m.lm), ranef(m.lmer)$g[,1])

and the result is 1 (the two perfectly match) The following R code:

g <-  1:200 |> as.character()
g.x <- runif(length(g))
n <- 10**4
y <- rnorm(n) + g.x
d <- data.frame(y, g)
m.lmer <- lmer(y ~ 0 + (1 | g), d)
m.lm <- lm(y ~ 0 + g, d)
cor(coefficients(m.lm), ranef(m.lmer)$g[,1])

The result is again 1 R code:

g <-  1:200 |> as.character()
g.x <- c(runif(length(g)/2, 1000, 1100), runif(length(g)/2, 0, 100))
n <- 10**4
y <- rnorm(n) + g.x
d <- data.frame(y, g)
m.lmer <- lmer(y ~ 0 + (1 | g), d)
m.lm <- lm(y ~ 0 + g, d)
cor(coefficients(m.lm), ranef(m.lmer)$g[,1])

Again, the correlation is 1, despite the very non-normal distribution
Reposted by Uriel Cohen Priva
cbchang.bsky.social
So sad to hear of Ian Maddieson's passing. He was an amazing linguist but also an inspiring instructor and a big part of why I went into phonetics. I've always been in awe of the depth and breadth of his knowledge of the most obscure languages and will miss his kindness and wit. RIP, Ian~ 🐦🐦
Ian Maddieson at Berkeley Linguistics' commencement, with Rebecca Cover and Charles Chang
🪬🪬🪬 that's early!
Her 8yo bilingualness:

/hameil oʊnli χosemz et hakor/
'the-coat only blocks+z ACC the-cold'

That's a double decker code switch
זה קרה בפלורנטין ואת משת"פית של לוינסון?
Thanks for revitalizing it, it's really a must read material for everyone, not just linguists. I just told my kids about it this morning. They were very impressed.
I will assign the bunny paper next time I teach intro. Thanks for that!

May his memory be a blessing (evidently it already is)
You can now share our Linguist List post as well!

Open area Visiting Assistant Professor at Brown, deadline February first

linguistlist.org/issues/35-35...
Brown's Program in Linguistics (that us!) is searching for a Visiting Assistant Professor (open field). One year appointment, possibly renewable, 2:2 teaching load, February 1st deadline

Please apply / retweet / forward

Email me if you have any questions

apply.interfolio.com/160337
Apply - Interfolio {{$ctrl.$state.data.pageTitle}} - Apply - Interfolio
apply.interfolio.com
Reposted by Uriel Cohen Priva
andriescoetzee.bsky.social
The search for new (co-)editor of Language has started! Please circulate widely. And do reach out if you have questions and/or are interested in applying. I did this job for six years — it was hard work, but also very rewarding.
Journal Language Seeks Next Co-Editor
mailchi.mp
Goodness, you had to ruin this website too.
היא צודקת, זה ממש קשה. הבעיה היא שישראל עוזבת אותה.
באיזה שהוא שלב שלחנו אותה עם חטיף אנרגיה של נייצ'ר וואלי, אבל היא חזרה מורעבת כי נאלצה לחלוק עם החברות.
There's no symbol for uvular approximants in the IPA. How about /ᴙ/?
יוגורט קטן עם קצת סוכר לבזוק ולערבב (קטנטנתי אוהבת)
A student once had me prove to the entire class that schwa and ʌ are not the same.
At some point my then 4-5 y/o decided that Hebrew is missing that process, and came up with /lop/ for /lo/ 'no'. Do other languages have it?
With my kids I find that the -le suffix enjoys like-minded company.
את יודעת שבגרמנית בן כלאיים זה בדיוק איך שקראו למישהו עם דם יהודי? Mischling. יצאת אנטישמית, תתביישי.