Wojciech Maj
@wojtekmaj.pl
Dad, husband, TypeScript developer.
prettier-plugin-uglier
February 6, 2026 at 11:25 PM
prettier-plugin-uglier
Hey my packages are only 135 likes away from #1!
February 6, 2026 at 9:11 AM
Hey my packages are only 135 likes away from #1!
February 5, 2026 at 10:02 PM
February 5, 2026 at 9:56 PM
That's the second most poetic thing an npmx developer has ever said π₯²
February 5, 2026 at 9:52 PM
That's the second most poetic thing an npmx developer has ever said π₯²
If not for this pesky bot at #2 you would have made it on the list tho :D
February 5, 2026 at 2:04 PM
If not for this pesky bot at #2 you would have made it on the list tho :D
One year of asking the corporate for @sentry.io and I got Splunk π At least I can get sassy in PR title.
February 4, 2026 at 10:08 AM
One year of asking the corporate for @sentry.io and I got Splunk π At least I can get sassy in PR title.
You guys got me scared it posts automatically on Bsky when you like a package π€£
February 4, 2026 at 6:45 AM
You guys got me scared it posts automatically on Bsky when you like a package π€£
Quick, @danielroe.dev is asleep, you can see a higher number!!!
February 4, 2026 at 12:15 AM
Quick, @danielroe.dev is asleep, you can see a higher number!!!
Immensely! But really, it's not just mocking: testing emails appearance on various email clients, mocking emails, reading actual emails in tests (e.g. password reset flow E2E), EVERYTHING that comes to my mind with emails sucks.
February 3, 2026 at 7:21 PM
Immensely! But really, it's not just mocking: testing emails appearance on various email clients, mocking emails, reading actual emails in tests (e.g. password reset flow E2E), EVERYTHING that comes to my mind with emails sucks.
"1st most popular, 3rd most popular, 2nd most popular PM" is a weird order
February 3, 2026 at 7:06 PM
"1st most popular, 3rd most popular, 2nd most popular PM" is a weird order
It's now less than 30 minutes BTW.
February 1, 2026 at 12:42 AM
It's now less than 30 minutes BTW.
Stolen footage from @danielroe.dev's webcam
a bald man in a blue shirt is making a funny face .
ALT: a bald man in a blue shirt is making a funny face .
media.tenor.com
February 1, 2026 at 12:11 AM
Stolen footage from @danielroe.dev's webcam
This is teetering on the edge between every open source maintainer's wet dream and their worst nightmare π
January 31, 2026 at 4:47 PM
This is teetering on the edge between every open source maintainer's wet dream and their worst nightmare π
Can confirm, awful stuff, 2 AM and I'm coding instead of having a rest before spending weekend with 2 small kids
January 31, 2026 at 12:54 AM
Can confirm, awful stuff, 2 AM and I'm coding instead of having a rest before spending weekend with 2 small kids
Absolutely. I'm going to be eternally grateful to Bun for that :D And for native TypeScript support on Node.js. This would NOT happen without Bun, I'm sure.
January 30, 2026 at 2:19 AM
Absolutely. I'm going to be eternally grateful to Bun for that :D And for native TypeScript support on Node.js. This would NOT happen without Bun, I'm sure.
Bun's lockfile isn't designed to be read by humans (yes, the new lockfile too), and thus makes it easier to sneak shady updates in.
In other words, it sacrifices DX, security, and stability to shave off a few milliseconds and excite people who can only think in numbers.
In other words, it sacrifices DX, security, and stability to shave off a few milliseconds and excite people who can only think in numbers.
January 29, 2026 at 10:23 PM
Bun's lockfile isn't designed to be read by humans (yes, the new lockfile too), and thus makes it easier to sneak shady updates in.
In other words, it sacrifices DX, security, and stability to shave off a few milliseconds and excite people who can only think in numbers.
In other words, it sacrifices DX, security, and stability to shave off a few milliseconds and excite people who can only think in numbers.
One good reason not to include Bun is that you'd be comparing apples to oranges. Bun "cheats" by only running postinstall on a predefined list of packages they deemed "safe".
It also caches stuff aggressively leading to behavior differences when compared to other package managers.
It also caches stuff aggressively leading to behavior differences when compared to other package managers.
January 29, 2026 at 10:23 PM
One good reason not to include Bun is that you'd be comparing apples to oranges. Bun "cheats" by only running postinstall on a predefined list of packages they deemed "safe".
It also caches stuff aggressively leading to behavior differences when compared to other package managers.
It also caches stuff aggressively leading to behavior differences when compared to other package managers.