Every Trump SCOTUS nominee: I respect stare decisis.

Super genius laying a trap here.

Me: Cat? No, probably person.

Look, this isn’t checkers, it’s four dimensional Price is Right.

*subjected, not diverted. WTF autocorrect???

Indeed. And even more if it weren’t just Democrats who were subjected to shame and consequences. (Though don’t get me wrong, I’m totally fine with Democrats being diverted to both and then some.)

According to the court they’re “new features” that have improved the products. I’m guessing this judge isn’t a heavy user of social platforms.

She never even mentions the bolt cutters. WTH??? She had one job, asking Bernice for bolt cutters, and she doesn’t come through!

Going off repeatedly about George Soros is quite a choice.

And on p. 10. This is quite the dissent.

I don’t know why but it really grates on me when people use “compute” as a noun.

No, just within the federal judicial district where the court is located (around Chicago).

I think his theory makes even more sense when you remember that digital advertising on the open web (which Google is endangering here) isn’t Google’s cash cow; search advertising is. So it makes sense to sacrifice that to keep users on Google’s properties, like search, and monetize them there.