No you didn’t. Genocide is a process and Israel’s behavior over time speaks to their intent. Not your “trust me bro” takes.

So dropping leaflets before bombs absolves you of war crimes? What are they teaching you in Switzerland?

You studied history but missed the part where genocide is defined by intent and acts, not how shiny the weapons are.

“Israel could’ve killed more, faster” is an admission, sweetie.

“They’re breeding faster than we can kill them so it’s not genocide.” That’s the argument?

Its not governance—it’s the Trump Tariff Tango

Of course, there is still the possibility that military assets—including the B-2s—are being deployed in part as a negotiating strategy.

However, in my eyes at least, that possibility is looking less likely than their being preparations for war.

We’ll see soon enough.

Those aren’t police or news choppers, whatever they are. Paramount is east of Compton, the next city over.

Anthropologist furious for being misgendered but OK with selective humanity and twisted bodies under the rubble of Gaza.

Anthropologist demands a rando on the internet perform literary analysis on a 1,000-year-old poem she’s weaponizing to justify state violence. Are we done here? My IBS is acting up.

I don’t accept that. But please keep trying to convince me—preferably until you’re blue in the face. Now excuse me while I take my mid-morning dump.

What I don’t care for is you only reading/knowing the one poem considering all the poems written across humanity. Maybe that’s problem?

Tonight at 11: Zionist Anthropologist tries—and fails spectacularly—to make fetch happen.