Francesco Giannini
aeroengineer.bsky.social
Francesco Giannini
@aeroengineer.bsky.social
Cook extraordinaire moonlighting as Aerospace engineer. Aviation history buff.
what's the difference between the JF- and the NF-? For some reason i remember the NF-104 being the one used for high altitude work.
February 3, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Too bad it was penalized by using piston engines- i always thought it was such an interesting design.
January 14, 2025 at 7:12 PM
There are approximately 100 cutaways covering the period between the Morane-Saulnier Type N and the F-18, with a concise but well-written description by the authors. My copy was a $4.29 used book store find :)
January 14, 2025 at 7:08 PM
The what?
January 13, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Whirlwind.
January 5, 2025 at 1:09 AM
Don't get me started with the 'foot-pounds of thrust'
December 25, 2024 at 10:16 PM
😎 Good, and with that I have used all of the flight dynamics knowledge I have 😅
December 16, 2024 at 9:34 PM
Is this designed to demonstrate inertia roll coupling?
December 16, 2024 at 9:05 PM
I love taking a peek at other aviation enthusiasts' bookshelves. Is the far right book a biography of Richard Vogt? He ranks among the most interesting aircraft designers as far as i am concerned.
December 15, 2024 at 4:27 PM
That's great news! If I may, though, the book description was a bit thin. I am certain it will be interesting, coming from you, but do you have a synopsis somewhere?
December 12, 2024 at 4:50 PM
At least they're not asking for the V/STOL variant yet...
December 9, 2024 at 7:19 PM
Considering how fond of the F-35C the Navy seems to be...
December 8, 2024 at 8:05 PM
It's a good thing the inboard part of a rotor does not do much for hover thrust...
The fairing probably helps with the significant hinges and actuation mechanism required for this to work.
December 5, 2024 at 7:41 PM
I think that's the report i was thinking of. Or at least the drawing looks familiar.
December 4, 2024 at 9:03 PM
"I don't know if those reports are on NTRS anymore, as a lot of stuff was removed years ago for export concerns, as I recall."
There is a very nice pdf of an Aug '72 issue of Astronautics and Aeronautics", i don't know if it's available online (if not DM me)
December 4, 2024 at 4:58 PM
Here's what our company's grey beard aerodynamicist had to say: "Yes, this was the ATT program. Boeing, Lockheed, and Convair did design studies based on a NASA configuration, which was the subject to extensive wind tunnel tests."
December 4, 2024 at 4:55 PM
I thought i saw something similar on the NTRS...and for some reason i remember Whitcomb being associated with it. But maybe i'm conflating two things.
December 3, 2024 at 11:25 PM