That's the 29th amendment

Get out of the hardware store you idiot, it's Man Day

Anyway, the only reason I remember is that the court focused on the point when he stopped, turned around, and asked her if she had anything, declaring that his "Columbo-esque piroutte" changed the character of the interaction and that language has stayed in my brain ever since.

The court ruled that a second interaction had started when he stopped and asked her that question, and that it became investigative at that point, and that she should have been apprised of her rights due to the interaction starting with the officer approaching her as a friend.

Then, as he's leaving, he stops and asks her the usual cop question "do you have anything on you that you shouldn't have?"
And of course she does, and eventually says so. But the question was raised about whether this was suddenly a detention or if it was still a friendly conversation.

One time I read a KS case where an officer stopped to talk to a woman on the street he knew from her frequent DV and possession involvements. He asked how she was doing, and if she was safe from the guy who had been a problem before, and things.

Seriously though, "we'd like to schedule an interview" is code for "you have no Miranda rights because you can leave at any time but we hope you screw up"

Brought to you by these heroes:

Idk if the chiefs can afford to extend him but I absolutely hope that they do. Chenal is a beast.

I don't want to see another Kennedy, Clinton, Bush, Trump, or fucking Roosevelt in office ever again. This is people's lives, it's not the family business.

Wow so how do they have so much money