Viktor H. Ahlqvist
@ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
370 followers 790 following 40 posts
Epidemiology @Aarhus & @Karolinska
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
Thank you, Magda! 🎉🎉 This will enable even more synergies between us!
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
Thanks mate ! Would not have been possible without your help and support!
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
Hey hey hey. All for the CV mate
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
Loool! Perhaps they are relying on scholar rather than their own publisher link? 😂
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
Doing multiple imputation? Do your auxiliary variables also have missing?! Check out this brilliant paper by Paul et al.

#episky
pmadleydowd.bsky.social
Final version published so time to talk about it: doi.org/10.1093/aje/...

When using multiple imputation to account for missing data we often use auxiliary variables (variables included in the imputation model but not the analysis model) to 1) reduce bias and 2) improve statistical efficiency.
Analyses using multiple imputation need to consider missing data in auxiliary variables
Abstract. Auxiliary variables are used in multiple imputation (MI) to reduce bias and increase efficiency. These variables may often themselves be incomple
doi.org
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
as would larger cohorts with deep phenotyping, ideally including genetics; I am deeply concerned about genetic confounding, considering the known genetic overlap between both psychiatric and epileptic indications and neurodevelopmental outcomes!
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
And yes, I definitely agree that there is likely residual confounding despite controlling for observed indications and SES. Better data on siblings would be incredibly useful, ...
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
Yes, they were independent of the original safety signals. Lamotrigine has been estimated to not be associated with malformations or neurodevelopmental outcomes in a series of cohorts.
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
It’s all quite challenging. However, we believe we’ve identified some consistent signals for valproate (expected), topiramate (verification of prior findings), and carbamazepine (novel). Whether these hold up under further causal scrutiny remains to be seen...!
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
We tried to adjust for many of these imbalances (inc bipolar indication), but the coverage & quality of the registry data have limitations. This is partly why sibling comparisons are valuable, assuming indications remain somewhat stable across pregnancies (this may not hold for episodic conditions).
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
However, it’s not ideal. As you noted, lamotrigine is also used for bipolar (and on/off-label elsewhere). Also, individuals with more 'severe indications' (e.g., generalized epilepsies) are often treated with e.g. topiramate, introducing differential indication severity even within antiseizure meds.
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
Re Lamotrigine: It is first-line treatment for epilepsy and is generally considered the safest option during pregnancy (not linked to malformations). Using it as a reference, rather than ‘no use,’ has clear advantages – and this approach has been used in the teratology literature.
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
Thanks for the interest, @sebatlab.bsky.social ! Agree that the sibling analysis shows (much) attenuation. However, we’re cautious about overinterpreting the statistical null given our limited power. Still, we believe this highlights the value of such analyses and the promise as samples grow larger.
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
Great end-of-year news (yes, I'm bragging—but I can't hold back my excitement over this team effort): Our paper on acetaminophen safety was one of the most popular in *JAMA* this year! jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...

#EpiSky
Reposted by Viktor H. Ahlqvist
ahlqvistviktor.bsky.social
New research out on antiseizure medications in pregnancy 🎉🎉
Nature Communications: nature.com/articles/s41...
Thread follows 🧵 🧵: