Maria Akopyan, PhD
@akopyan.bsky.social
180 followers 140 following 17 posts
evolutionary genomics | 🐸🐟🦊🧬 | 🇺🇸🇦🇲 | she/her
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
akopyan.bsky.social
Thanks! That’s something we’re aware of but didn’t deal with in this study - it’s actually the first thing we mention in our limitations section. It’s definitely an important consideration that warrants investigation in future work.
akopyan.bsky.social
Now published in Cell! We found that ~15% of SNPs from divergent refs did not liftover as SNPs in the gray fox ref—half mapped to monomorphic sites, half failed to map. Co-authored with Matthew Genchev, @elliecat.bsky.social, and @jazlynmooney.bsky.social

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
akopyan.bsky.social
I’ve been meaning to write this for a while… but ADHD 😅

I finally did! It’s about creating academic spaces that actually work for people with ADHD. If it resonates, I’d love to connect or hear your thoughts.

www.insidehighered.com/opinion/care...

#ADHD #Neurodiversity #HigherEd
How to Create an ADHD Academic Community (opinion)
Maria Akopyan writes that a grad school ADHD group became a career-spanning lifeline.
www.insidehighered.com
Reposted by Maria Akopyan, PhD
couchmicroscopy.bsky.social
On this week’s ep, Kevin Bird (@stairwaytokevin.bsky.social) explains the events of the last 3 months, how science is funded in the United States, why it is being attacked so aggressively, and the ideologies behind these attacks. Found everywhere you get podcasts.
open.spotify.com/episode/0E9l...
Is science political? - with Kevin Bird
Tiny Living Beings · Episode
open.spotify.com
akopyan.bsky.social
Huge thanks to my incredible co-authors Anna Tigano (@annatigano.bsky.social), Arne Jacobs (@fishyomics.bsky.social), Aryn Wilder, and Nina Therkildsen for their brilliant contributions to this work. This truly represents years of collaborative effort across multiple institutions! 🧬🐟 7/7
akopyan.bsky.social
This study offers valuable empirical insights distinguishing the roles of inversions (conditionally low-recombining) vs. centromeres (consistently low-recombining), illuminating the critical connection between genome structure and local adaptation with gene flow. 6/7
akopyan.bsky.social
Meanwhile, putative centromeric regions showed high differentiation but LOW sequence divergence—suggesting they're unlikely to contribute to adaptive divergence with gene flow, despite their recombination-suppressing properties. 5/7
akopyan.bsky.social
The most fascinating discovery? Different genomic features play distinct roles: Chromosomal inversions showed both high differentiation AND high sequence divergence—evidence they maintain locally adapted alleles despite gene flow. 4/7
akopyan.bsky.social
With increasing gene flow, we observed more clustering of differentiated regions in the genome! This supports theoretical predictions that high gene flow favors concentrated genomic architectures of adaptation. 3/7
akopyan.bsky.social
We found a continuum of genome-wide differentiation increasing from south to north, reflecting higher connectivity among southern populations and reduced gene flow at northern latitudes. 2/7
akopyan.bsky.social
Excited to share our new paper on genetic differentiation in Atlantic silversides! We investigated how genome structure influences adaptation under varying levels of gene flow using a species-specific reference genome and multiple recombination maps. Read on for insights! doi.org/10.1093/molb... 1/7
Genetic differentiation is constrained to chromosomal inversions and putative centromeres in locally adapted populations with higher gene flow
Abstract. The impact of genome structure on adaptation is a growing focus in evolutionary biology, revealing an important role for structural variation and
doi.org
akopyan.bsky.social
7/7 🦊 Huge thanks to my amazing co-authors Matthew Genchev @jazlynmooney.bsky.social @elliecat.bsky.social and shoutout to Urocyon cinereoargenteus, our beautiful study species! 🐾📸 #Teamwork #Genomics
akopyan.bsky.social
6/7 🌍 Why It Matters: With most species lacking conspecific references, genomic studies often rely on divergent genomes, risking biased population genomic inferences. Reference genome choice matters—use species-matched references or reference-free methods when possible to ensure accurate insights.
akopyan.bsky.social
5/7 🎯 Selection Scans: Arctic fox and dog references identified more than twice the number of unique FST outlier windows compared to the gray fox reference. Each reference identified distinct gene ontology terms underlying outliers, reflecting different biological processes.
akopyan.bsky.social
4/7 ⏳ Demography & Recombination: The gray fox genome produced higher and more stable estimates of historical population sizes. Additionally, recombination rates inferred from heterospecific genomes were inflated, particularly at chromosome ends, compared to the gray fox genome.
akopyan.bsky.social
3/7 📊 Population Genomics: The conspecific gray fox genome detected more SNPs, especially rare variants, and yielded higher estimates of nucleotide diversity (π) and differentiation (FST) compared to dog and Arctic fox genomes.
akopyan.bsky.social
2/7 🔍 What We Did: Using two lineages of gray foxes as a case study, we compared three reference genomes: domestic dog, Arctic fox, and a conspecific gray fox genome.