Process-wise, a pilot for 'Relevant Stakeholder' participation (civil society, academia) has been contested by some Member States.

A non-transparent process that limits stakeholder inclusion is concerning, as it risks undermining the trust and broad support pivotal to a treaty's long-term success.

Key unresolved areas include:
- The governance of sequence databases so as to enable benefit sharing
- Interactions with other legal frameworks (IHR, Nagoya Protocol)
- Persistent misunderstanding around contract law & licensing

Paths to good governance for equity and public health *are* possible.

Feeding America has a page where you can input your zip code and it'll show you all of the food banks near you overlaid on a map. If you need it, it's there. If you don't need it, think about donating money if you have it and your time if you don't.

www.feedingamerica.org/find-your-lo...

It’s such a clear cut contrast to Democratic leadership to date that descend into explanations that distract and appear to legitimize debate. Instead: Maintain outrage, refuse to concede on dignity and the rule of law, and provide tangible solutions directly relevant to constituents’ experiences.

For more than three decades, @UNDP.org Human Development Reports have sought to improve human lives, opportunities, and freedoms by creating environments for people to develop their full potential and well-being.

Find out more here: hdr.undp.org