Akira Miyake
@amiyake.bsky.social
3.9K followers 300 following 940 posts
Professor @ CU Boulder. 🇯🇵 Self-regulation of thought, behavior, & motivation (e.g., procrastination, self-control, mind-wandering, repetitive negative thinking, habits). Improving student learning. 1st-gen. A proud cat daddy🐱 Go Seattle Mariners 🔱
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Akira Miyake
mattmattoni.bsky.social
🚨🚨New precision imaging study and open dataset 🚨🚨 Featuring almost 200 functional runs acquired in 3-4d intervals and behavioral manipulations focused on intraindividual study of the reward response - The Night Owls Scan Club (NOSC) With @dvsmith.bsky.social and @olinotom.bsky.social!
Reposted by Akira Miyake
michaeljkane.bsky.social
Attending Psychonomics in Denver? Consider arriving early enough to join the 2nd mtg of the Symposium for Individual Differences (SIDIC) on Thurs. Registration is open thru 10/31 & we've got a great program planned, with a keynote by @amiyake.bsky.social
caliberlab.wixsite.com/sidic2025/pr...
Program | SIDIC 2025
caliberlab.wixsite.com
amiyake.bsky.social
Whether this multilab project actually takes place depends on the availability of funds, but I hope the funding will materialize! I cover this classic study in my cog psych class, but, as the graph shows, the effect is rather small. I'd be interested in finding out what comes out of it.
amiyake.bsky.social
@rolfzwaan.bsky.social is organizing a multilab replication of Loftus & Palmer's (1974) classic study: People's memory of two cars' speed was influenced by the verb used in Q ("How fast were the cars moving when they ____"). This is exciting, & if you want to take part in it, check out Rolf's post.
A graph summarizing the results of the Loftus & Palmer (1974) study, indicating that the estimated speed of the cars varies as a function of the verbs used in the questioning (e.g., contacted, hit, bumped, collided, smashed). 

The graph is from this site: https://www.earlyyears.tv/loftus-and-palmer-1974-car-crash-experiment/
Reposted by Akira Miyake
Reposted by Akira Miyake
matthewrobison.bsky.social
Notre Dame is hiring in Psychology! We have an open-rank, tenure/TT position in Cognitive Neuroscience: apply.interfolio.com/170229

Application deadline is soon (Sept. 15)
Apply - Interfolio {{$ctrl.$state.data.pageTitle}} - Apply - Interfolio
apply.interfolio.com
amiyake.bsky.social
Here's a replication of an informal Big 5 result I posted yesterday (the original post is pinned on my profile page). Glad to see that @aurelienallard.bsky.social found the same result. I'd love to see more attempts like this on Big 5 or other constructs. Thanks, Aurélien, for doing this analysis!
aurelienallard.bsky.social
So cool! For what it's worth, I've just tried to replicate the result for the 50-items IPIP from open psychometrics (openpsychometrics.org/_rawdata/). There's also 0 participant falling into each average category for this dataset. If constructs were orthogonal this should have been 6 (out of 20,000)
Open psychology data: Raw data from online personality tests
About this website
openpsychometrics.org
amiyake.bsky.social
I'd be happy to ask the grad student who did this analysis as a part of a little class project, but, in the meantime, here's a Big 5 replication attempt by @aurelienallard.bsky.social. I'd love to see how our and his results fare in other datasets.
aurelienallard.bsky.social
So cool! For what it's worth, I've just tried to replicate the result for the 50-items IPIP from open psychometrics (openpsychometrics.org/_rawdata/). There's also 0 participant falling into each average category for this dataset. If constructs were orthogonal this should have been 6 (out of 20,000)
Open psychology data: Raw data from online personality tests
About this website
openpsychometrics.org
amiyake.bsky.social
Wow, thanks for trying to replicate the informal class project result w/ a different dataset! That's amazing!
amiyake.bsky.social
Here's some replication by @aurelienallard.bsky.social using a different dataset based on 50 items in case you're interested. I'd love to see more replications w/ Big 5 & other psychological constructs (e.g., intelligence).
aurelienallard.bsky.social
So cool! For what it's worth, I've just tried to replicate the result for the 50-items IPIP from open psychometrics (openpsychometrics.org/_rawdata/). There's also 0 participant falling into each average category for this dataset. If constructs were orthogonal this should have been 6 (out of 20,000)
Open psychology data: Raw data from online personality tests
About this website
openpsychometrics.org
amiyake.bsky.social
At least some (possibly all) of the 10 body measurements are likely to be correlated (even substantially), so I tend to think that the math based on total independence might not quite capture what happened in the Daniels pilot study.
Reposted by Akira Miyake
nataliepeluso.com
Cool thread. Excellent reminder that bodies and personalities (and faces fwiw) are multidimensional, and that averages are poor lenses with which to examine them. Further, relationships within/between dimensions may be complex - jagged, yes, but also networked & dynamic

#neuroskyence #psychscisky
amiyake.bsky.social
ANSWER: 0 (yes, ZERO!)

This is a result of an analysis done by a student in my grad seminar, using a large dataset (N=307,313).

What this result might mean: Nobody's personality is truly "average," and people's personality profiles (at least Big 5) might be more "jagged" than we think.

(🧵 1/5)
amiyake.bsky.social
Imagine you have Big 5 personality scores from over 300,000 people. You designate the scores in the "mean +/- 0.25 SDs" range for each trait (~20%) as the average range.

QUESTION: How many people in this >300K sample do you think fall in the average range for ALL 5 TRAITS?

What's your answer?
Reposted by Akira Miyake
bsky.app
Bluesky @bsky.app · Sep 8
v1.108 is rolling out today 🚚

Now live, at long last: Bookmarks, aka Saved Posts. For all those posts you'll definitely plan to come back to!

Update the app and give it a try. The button is right down there 👇
Reposted by Akira Miyake
Reposted by Akira Miyake
ashenhav.bsky.social
I'm happy to now be able to share a talk I gave at TEDx New England last Fall! 

The talk is about our lab's work on what makes decisions costly, and how to make them less so.

I discuss lessons for all kinds of decisions, including getting people to vote.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeHg...
How to make a choice when the options suck | Amitai Shenhav | TEDxNewEngland
YouTube video by TEDx Talks
www.youtube.com
amiyake.bsky.social
Well, the answer turned out to be ZERO! (A follow-up thread pinned to my profile page provides a bit of an explanation of what we did.)
amiyake.bsky.social
The answer turned out to be ZERO in one informal analysis (see a follow-up thread pinned to my profile page for more info).
Reposted by Akira Miyake
amiyake.bsky.social
ANSWER: 0 (yes, ZERO!)

This is a result of an analysis done by a student in my grad seminar, using a large dataset (N=307,313).

What this result might mean: Nobody's personality is truly "average," and people's personality profiles (at least Big 5) might be more "jagged" than we think.

(🧵 1/5)
amiyake.bsky.social
Imagine you have Big 5 personality scores from over 300,000 people. You designate the scores in the "mean +/- 0.25 SDs" range for each trait (~20%) as the average range.

QUESTION: How many people in this >300K sample do you think fall in the average range for ALL 5 TRAITS?

What's your answer?
A figure from Simply Psychology illustrating Big Five personality traits: agreeableness, extraversion, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience.

This figure comes from:
https://www.simplypsychology.org/big-five-personality.html
amiyake.bsky.social
Perhaps your QB situation will change soon, and they might perform better?

The Seahawks didn't do well, either, today, especially at the very end. Sigh...
amiyake.bsky.social
That’s impressive, especially because the fence seems really high!
Reposted by Akira Miyake
amiyake.bsky.social
What a story! What happened to the 4 kittens?