Benjamin P Taylor
@antlerboy.com
3.9K followers 10K following 2.1K posts
systems | cybernetics | complexity public | service | transformation business evolutionary | avid learner #wordrotator #poastrationalist https://chosen-path.org connect at antlerboy.com redquadrant.com publicservicetransformation.org skeeting personally
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
antlerboy.com
yes, quite likely I guess - I've also just lucked into / worked hard on a network of people who can at least put up with this sort of thing, including SCiO as a learning organisation - and of course set up my own consultancy :-D
antlerboy.com
Could whoever writes government responses to Parliamentary petitions PLEASE Go On A Course?
✔️clarity
✔️ref relevant policies
❌big fat 'eff off' every time
❌crowbarring in voter ID (Labour opposed)
...do they realise the damage these responses do?
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/72...
Petition: Use Proportional Representation at the next General Election
Change the voting system to Proportional Representation instead of First Past the Post. We think this would eradicate disillusionment and encourage voter participation as people could start to…
petition.parliament.uk
antlerboy.com
Join the PSTA for our free webinar tomorrow with Randy S'ad.
Breakthrough Transformation: Appealing to Municipal Sector Leaders and Enabling Deeper Change. Randy Sa’d, will share about the Enterprise Evolution Program. Oct 8, 2025 03:00 PM
Register now: bit.ly/42tF2Qg
antlerboy.com
Well I first got exposed to Peter Block's Flawless Consulting at PwC, and I've seen people and orgs with this kind culture. Including my own!
We try to consult on this way and it works. In some ways it might limit us too.
But as long as there are currents of this stuff there's the potential.
antlerboy.com
Most consultants pride themselves on having answers – I think that’s a problem. www.linkedin.com/posts/antler... How would you react if a consultant showed upwith questions? What would consulting look like if we measured success by what clients can achieve without the consultant?
#systemicconsulting | Benjamin P. Taylor
Most consultants pride themselves on having answers – I think that’s a problem. In the public sector especially, we’ve all seen the 'expert' parachute in with a ready solution. And how often it...
www.linkedin.com
Reposted by Benjamin P Taylor
abeba.bsky.social
so I am one of the 12 people (including the “god-fathers of AI”) that will be at the Vatican this September for a two full-day working group on the Future of AI

here is my Vatican approved short provocation on 'AI and Fraternity' for the working group
AI and Fraternity, Abeba Birhane, AI Accountability Lab  

I envision a future where human dignity, justice, peace, kindness, care, respect, accountability, and rights and freedoms serve as the north stars that guide AI development and use. Realising these ideals can’t happen without intentional tireless work, dialogues, and confrontations of ugly realities – even if they are uncomfortable to deal with. This starts with deciphering hype from reality. Pervasive narratives portray AI as a magical, fully autonomous entity approaching a God-like omnipotence and omniscience. In reality, audits of AI systems reveal a consistent failure to deliver on grandiose promises and suffer from all kinds of shortcomings, issues often swept under the rug. AI in general, and GenAI in particular, encodes and exacerbates historical stereotypes, entrenches harmful societal norms, and amplifies injustice. A robust body of  evidence demonstrates that — from hiring, welfare allocation, medical care allocation to anything in between — deployment of AI is widening inequity, disproportionately impacting people at the margins of society and concentrating power and influence in the hands of few. Major actors—including Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and OpenAI—have willingly aligned with authoritarian regimes and proactively abandoned their pledges to fact-check, prevent misinformation, respect diversity and equity, refrain from using AI for weapons development, while retaliating against critique. The aforementioned vision can’t and won’t happen without confrontation of these uncomfortable facts. This is precisely why we need active resistance and refusal of unreliable and harmful AI systems; clearly laid out regulation and enforcement; and shepherding of the AI industry towards transparency and accountability of responsible bodies. "Machine agency" must be in service of human agency and empowerment, a coexistence that isn't a continuation of modern tech corporations’ inequality-widening,
antlerboy.com
well yes, a good question to ask. But I buy that 'big data' itself was not 'intended', originally...

(BTW can't believe I'm only just following you on here)