Christian Moore-Anderson
@cmooreanderson.bsky.social
2K followers 780 following 2.9K posts
Biology Teacher & Head of Bio (11–18) 📗Rules of Meaning Making (Forthcoming) 📘Difference Maker (🇬🇧 & 🇪🇸) 📙Biology Made Real (🇬🇧 & 🇪🇸) Blog: rb.gy/dyi5a #EnactiveCogSci
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
bigbiology.bsky.social
Read our newest blog “Why evolution isn't just about plants and animals” 📖

Find this post and episode with Mike Lynch “Evolution across scales” at our Substack: bigbiology.substack.com

#sciencecommunication #science #sciencepodcast #evolution #evolutionarybiology
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
I co-constructed a very successful model with my Year 10s today. We used it as a basis to explain many different phenomena.

Rather than a single explanation like most diagrams provide, models provide the springboard to many explanations.

#iTeachBio #SciTeachUK #EduSky
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
pessoabrain.bsky.social
Not sure this is showing: the paper is not yours to write
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
I co-constructed a very successful model with my Year 10s today. We used it as a basis to explain many different phenomena.

Rather than a single explanation like most diagrams provide, models provide the springboard to many explanations.

#iTeachBio #SciTeachUK #EduSky
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
There are lots of people over on LinkedIn but it is a really poor experience scrolling through so many AI generated posts, or worse, posts by people mimicking AI-style posts. Everything is becoming so homogenous and boring.
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
There are lots of people over on LinkedIn but it is a really poor experience scrolling through so many AI generated posts, or worse, posts by people mimicking AI-style posts. Everything is becoming so homogenous and boring.
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
rethinkingjames.bsky.social
This amazing event is both online and face-to-face, so wherever you are in the world, you will be most welcome! It's an 'unconference' designed to crowd-source ideas for how we might increase wellbeing within the constraints of the current system #wearethesystem

Link 👇
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
I'm really sorry, you deserve much better. I'm an immigrant in Spain, and proud to live in one of the only countries in the world to be fighting this dark movement and standing up to Trump, genocide, and the far right.
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
Even when you say "striving for optima" there is a claim that optima exist. So, this is what I was referring to. When people ask about optima, the answer is included in the question. They have already accepted that optima exist, can be known, and worked towards.
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
When people come into a complex system and say they know the optimum, or even, "I aim for an optimum" they are making claims about nature. They say, "Optima exist" and, "I can know them", and this only tells me about that person, rather than nature.
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
Aside from this initial point, I think there are negative consequences for accepting optima into our view of systems. I mentioned this further up, but want to differentiate between the two things. I disagree with both the premise of optima, and the implications that people assume.
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
Optima don't exist in complex systems, but using the word brings them into being in people's criteria as if they were part of nature. I'm not sure what other people can mean by "optimum" aside from its definition. How else do you think people use it?
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
Not really. The key part was: checked against an observer's criteria. This is the difference maker. There isn't any optimum in nature, we only ever work towards *our goal* and check our performance against our criteria.
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
As soon as we use the word optimum, it becomes part of our ideas and has a place in the world.
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
I said "we strive for the best" which is then checked against the observers criteria. In other words, we strive to do "our best". We do what we can with what we have.
In my view, it isn't just semantics. I disagree that there could be an optimum in complex systems.
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
Would you not agree? You say "be careful with optima", which means there is a place for "optima" in your world.
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
I think this means that you accept the notion of an optimum.
Rather than a "not good box" as if I assigned it a "false" label, I reject the notion.
Reposted by Christian Moore-Anderson
juanfernandez.bsky.social
Have you ever wondered why some unsupported ideas about teaching just won’t die—no matter how much evidence we present? 🧠
Let’s talk about educational misconceptions, their persistence, and what this means for educational research and practice. 🧵
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
I think we should avoid talk of an optimum. It isn't tenable and only creates an elite who can claim to command over others.

E.g. I remember people saying:
" if you don't use mini whiteboards in lessons, you are knowingly creating suboptimal learning."

This is, of course, utter bollocks.
cmooreanderson.bsky.social
And yet, with time, the river changes, the rocks change and weather, so do the types of boats. The system evolves, and an optimum was never on the cards.