PessoaBrain
@pessoabrain.bsky.social
9.1K followers 680 following 2.1K posts
Luiz Pessoa, University of Maryland, College Park Neuroscientist interested in cognitive-emotional brain Author of The Entangled Brain, MIT Press, 2022 Author of The Cogitive-Emotional Brain, MIT Press, 2013 Neuroscience & Philosophy Salon (YouTube)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
pessoabrain.bsky.social
Reintroduction...
I'm a neuroscientist interested in emotion-motivation-cognition interactions.
Interested in conceptual/foundational issues.
I also wrote a book for general audience readers called The Entangled Brain that is open access at MIT Press.
mitpress.mit.edu/978026254460...
#neuroscience
The Entangled Brain
A new vision of the brain as a fully integrated, networked organ.Popular neuroscience accounts often focus on specific mind-brain aspects like addiction, cog...
mitpress.mit.edu
pessoabrain.bsky.social
Thanks, looks great. Maybe Ned Block @neddo.bsky.social would be interested in joining the discussion with Anil Seth Oct 23 and/or we can organize another salon 😁
pessoabrain.bsky.social
Very few things. Unfortunately he rejected evolutionary thinking by other scholars. Had her sided with them where would we be today!!
Reposted by PessoaBrain
juangallego.bsky.social
🚨Big news!🚨
The lab is relocating to Lisbon, joining a great team of experimental and theoretical neuroscientists, and the Neurotechnology Warehouse, a new initiative to bridge basic and translational research.

I'll be sharing postdoc openings soon. Come join us in this new incarnation of the lab!
champalimaudr.bsky.social
🧠🎼 What does it take to restore movement? Neuroscientist and engineer, @juangallego.bsky.social, joins the new Centre for Restorative Neurotechnology at the Champalimaud Foundation.

🔗 Find out more in this interview: www.fchampalimaud.org/news/juan-al...
pessoabrain.bsky.social
Super interesting, thanks for sharing. This is very valuable in the context of foundation models for neuroscience, of which I'm very skeptical.
pessoabrain.bsky.social
This might be harsh but if they can't really write well enough (in the scientific sense) it needs to be rejected. Imo a reviewer or editor's role is not to write it for them. Of course one can always suggest clarifying the study's motivation, background literature discussion, etc.
pessoabrain.bsky.social
I would say no. I guess one can do this judiciously but the review process is not a place for this exchange. Imo
pessoabrain.bsky.social
Not sure this is showing: the paper is not yours to write
pessoabrain.bsky.social
Do you review papers? Check out Earl's @earlkmiller.bsky.social recommendations.
The one that i would emphasize the most:

jocnf.pubpub.org/pub/qag76ip8...
pessoabrain.bsky.social
I'll check your content soon!
pessoabrain.bsky.social
Didn't know you were on bsky!
Reposted by PessoaBrain
nicolecrust.bsky.social
I get it. Similar thoughts inspired me to write a book. I began pessimistic, like this author, but I came out on the other side with renewed optimism.

As a counterpoint to the blog below, this podcast could be titled, "Why Nicole Rust stayed"

www.fchampalimaud.org/news/episode...
pessoabrain.bsky.social
𝗔𝗻 𝗘𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆
This short book by Moreno and Pereto' looks very interesting. One more on the understanding of biological agency.
And it's open access!
link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
pessoabrain.bsky.social
I think Anil raises very good points that we should not dismiss "the biological". But hopefully you can join the discussion too!
pessoabrain.bsky.social
Humans do that a lot too!
banditelli.org
When I posted this many folks said this likely isn't an injury, it's just something they do to stay warm, and OMG today over 100 sanderlings flew in right next to me and almost all of them were hopping on one foot. See thread for more 😭🪶
pessoabrain.bsky.social
It would be great if some of the people writing commentaries to the target paper joined the discussion💯
pessoabrain.bsky.social
𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗺
Is consciousness tied to biological brains?
Neuro&Philo Salon present+discussion with @anilseth.bsky.social of his BBS target paper!
October 23, noon USA eastern
#neuroskyence
Register: umd.zoom.us/meeting/regi...
doi.org/10.1017/S014...
pessoabrain.bsky.social
Amazing, but we do psychology and Neuro like that too! 🤣
pessoabrain.bsky.social
Sorry, I didn't write it clearly. I'm wondering what available structural connectomes based on diffusion imaging are thought to provide the most reliable estimates of anatomical connectivity.
pessoabrain.bsky.social
Human anatomical connectivity: what are currently the best structural connectomes available?
thanks
#neuroskyence
pessoabrain.bsky.social
If only I could get to 1.0... that would be really amazing.
But I'm comfortable with my limitations 😮